Don't ask, Don't tell repealed

#126
#126
gsvol said:
The truth of the matter is that you are a historical illiterate.

The PinkSwastika 4th Edition - Final
Click to expand...

Persecution of Homosexuals in the Third Reich

Homosexuals and the Third Reich

http://www1.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Microsoft Word - 6424.pdf

As per usual, my sources are > your sources.

Mine are accredited indexes of valid info... and you post some blog dedicated to being "pro-family?" Get real, cochise.

Yeah, I'm detached from reality. I'm guessing that it pissed you off when I associated a view you had with something reminiscent of the Nazi mentality.



gsvol said:
And you are a disrespctful doofus with little knowledge on any subject who thinks he knows most everything.
Click to expand...

What's that, pot?

Is it really disrespectful to call out the biggest loon on these boards? I like to think I'm doing a service here when I inform you on just how distorted your logic is at times.


gsvol said:
What is sad is that is going to take years for you to grow out of it and as extreme as you hold your idiotic views you may grow old holding such idiotic nonsense to be the truth.
Click to expand...

Take a step back, and re-evaluate what you're saying.

It's rare that I see someone as extreme as you. From what I've seen, you'd have no qualms if a worldwide Muslim genocide occurred tomorrow. If you're as old as I'm guessing, then it's sad that almost no fruition seems to have come from all your time and experience. I mean, it's one thing to hold silly views on how the world should work, but your knowledge on US history seems to be quite hampered or distorted. Again, it's sad.





gsvol said:
I don't feel sorry for you even though you are so far moved from reality, someday you may come to your senses.
Click to expand...

:eek:lol:



gsvol said:
You seem so passionate about the topic.

The thing about it to me is this, if homosexuals have been able to serve in the past and they have, why is it so important now that they can be 'openly homosexual?'

What does the term 'openly homosexual' even mean??
Click to expand...

I'm passionate about the topic because you're fooling yourself if you think it isn't relevant to the principals this country was founded on. No man or woman should have to hide who they are to fight for this country.

They're performing a service that most Americans won't in their lifetime, and it's sad that it's taken so long for the head honchos in DC (and a fraction of Americans) to come around.

You failed to give a secular reason as to why homosexuals shouldn't serve, by the way.
 
#127
#127
all the asian boys had better hide when the navy comes in. that would have to be a homo's dream, visiting thailand or hong kong. I wonder how much aids in the military will increase?
 
#128
#128
volfanbill said:
The only reason it bothers me is that homophobia is rampant in the army and I honestly don't think a lot of soldiers will take this well and if some homosexual soldiers do decide to come out of the closet per say or if some sign up, unit cohesion could hit severe lows and I fully expect some homosexual soldiers who step out to be attacked verbally, mentally and most importantly physically, thus weakening our military.

They said the same thing before the desegregation on the military prior to 1948.

I think over time it will become accepted better, but I see lots of EO meetings in the future and lots of initial problems with soldiers not willing to accept working next to a homosexual. Betweent the EO meetings, article 15s, mental counselings of those assaulted and then those chaptered out, it's just not a good time to introduce this law. We're still fighting two wars (regardless of what Obama wants to call what's going on in Iraq) and so many of our enemies are trying to flex their muscle all at once. I'm fine with gays serving in the military, but I just fear too many are going to take offense to it and bad things will result.
The only problem that I might have with this whole thing, is the timing. I will agree there would have been a better time for a radical change other than present time.
Click to expand...
.
 
#129
#129
BearCat204 said:
The only problem that I might have with this whole thing, is the timing. I will agree there would have been a better time for a radical change other than present time.
Click to expand...

I agree with that. Just don't see it as a good time to implement change like this
 
#130
#130
the other thing I'm anxiously awaiting is for this to be allowed, homosexual marriages to be permitted within the year, and thus allowing every single soldier living in the barracks to "marry" his buddy and thus be allowed BAH and live off post.
 
#131
#131
joevol320 said:
all the asian boys had better hide when the navy comes in. that would have to be a homo's dream, visiting thailand or hong kong. I wonder how much aids in the military will increase?
Click to expand...

You know what's hilarious? You're sincerely saying these things while numerous people in this thread are spewing the exact same concepts... for the sake of satirizing homophobic dingbats.
 
#132
#132
DinkinFlicka said:
You know what's hilarious? You're sincerely saying these things while numerous people in this thread are spewing the exact same concepts... for the sake of satirizing homophobic dingbats.
Click to expand...

there was guy on my ship who was gay. when our ship was in drydock and we lived in barracks, this guy jumped on on of the new guys that was stationed there and tried to rape him. he fought the dude off and ran out in the hall, screaming. They kicked the guy out.

with these new laws, they would have defended the guy doing the attacking.

America RIP.
 
#133
#133
joevol320 said:
there was guy on my ship who was gay. when our ship was in drydock and we lived in barracks, this guy jumped on on of the new guys that was stationed there and tried to rape him. he fought the dude off and ran out in the hall, screaming. They kicked the guy out.

with these new laws, they would have defended the guy doing the attacking.

America RIP.
Click to expand...

you're exactly the type of person I fear will make this a problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#134
#134
joevol320 said:
there was guy on my ship who was gay. when our ship was in drydock and we lived in barracks, this guy jumped on on of the new guys that was stationed there and tried to rape him. he fought the dude off and ran out in the hall, screaming. They kicked the guy out.

with these new laws, they would have defended the guy doing the attacking.

America RIP.
Click to expand...

Bull****, you're a pathetic liar.
 
#136
#136
On the lighter side, Hollywood is working on a movie covering the repeal of the DADT. It will be a Top Gun/Brokeback Mountain theme called "Watch Your Six". Sorry, I could not help myself.
 
#138
#138
I guess assault/rape never happens in the Navy with heterosexual males. I'm shocked the brass can't see this
 
#142
#142
JTrainDavis said:
I'm leaning towards this opinion.

You forgot to add in uneducated redneck and bigot.
Click to expand...

People like joevol are the real enemies to America. It is scary what people like him are thinking up sitting in some trailer somewhere putting on lip stick.
 
#146
#146
joevol320 said:
there was guy on my ship who was gay. when our ship was in drydock and we lived in barracks, this guy jumped on on of the new guys that was stationed there and tried to rape him. he fought the dude off and ran out in the hall, screaming. They kicked the guy out.

with these new laws, they would have defended the guy doing the attacking.
America RIP.
Click to expand...

I uh...don't think so.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top