Don't ask, Don't tell repealed

#201
#201
joevol320 said:
if you read any of david horowitz's stuff when he was a communist in the 50's. He specifically wrote about how to bring down America's military. it was to allow homos to serve openly. there are other well known communists that have echoed the same thing.

America it was good to know you. RIP
Click to expand...

lol.
 
#202
#202
gsvol said:
Uh, I don't know if it has escaped your scrutiny but repeal of DADT doesn't mean you can marry your dignificant other.

Homos don't want equal rights they want preferential rights and we will see how this all plays out.
Click to expand...

Some states allow same sex marriage. Therefore, the question is, do married homosexuals get the same benefits as married heterosexuals. That's a situation the military is trying to work out.
 
#204
#204
gsvol said:
Also you scoffed when I mentioned the nazi party
was made up of homosexuals, more on that:

The PinkSwastika 4th Edition - Final



Now you can revert to your stupid, immature attempts at insult and character assassination. :whistling:
Click to expand...

You're using the same, stupid source that has zero credibility in the real world.

I'll resume whatever it takes to get you to shut up for a few weeks in order to restore the sound balance of reason to these discussions. I've logically debated with you, and it doesn't work--regardless of how far off the deep end you may or may not be.

Let's tally up the personal quips and insults between you and I and see who pisses farther, bumpkin.

Do you demolish glass houses for a living or do you just get off from shooting yourself in the foot?

Bring me a .org or .gov source to back up your hapless arguments. Fact remains: my sources are far more credible than yours.
 
#205
#205
RhodeIslandVol said:
Some states allow same sex marriage. Therefore, the question is, do married homosexuals get the same benefits as married heterosexuals. That's a situation the military is trying to work out.
Click to expand...

You're talking pork, right??

RhodeIslandVol said:
Almost as dumb as the comment that you were replying to.
Click to expand...

Reminds me of the sexual practices of some south pacific sea castaways who looked to nature to satisfiy their sexual needs since they had no women for that purpose, they would catch a squid, place it on their penis and then stand over a small camp fire, the squid, in his effort to get away from the heat would try to climb away and it is said this can be very stimulating to a penis. :pepper:
 
#206
#206
DinkinFlicka said:
You're using the same, stupid source that has zero credibility in the real world.

I'll resume whatever it takes to get you to shut up for a few weeks in order to restore the sound balance of reason to these discussions. I've logically debated with you, and it doesn't work--regardless of how far off the deep end you may or may not be.

Let's tally up the personal quips and insults between you and I and see who pisses farther, bumpkin.

Do you demolish glass houses for a living or do you just get off from shooting yourself in the foot?

Bring me a .org or .gov source to back up your hapless arguments. Fact remains: my sources are far more credible than yours.
Click to expand...

My link provides well documented, extensivly footnoted texts vs what your brainwashed opinion with absolutely nothing to support your absurd accusations.

Get real for a change.

You call me a bumpkin, you're too stupid for intelligent discourse, and that is intuitively obvious to even the most casual of observers.

Your sources are more accurate? What source do you quote to claim the nazis weren't a bunch of sexual devients who praised and indulged in homosexuality?

Is English your native language?? You should have said "between you and me" instead of saying "between you and I."

BTW, if you think you are going to make me 'shut up' you are fighting a lost cause.

Another thing, I am more likely to shoot you between your beady little eyes than I am to shoot myself in the foot.
 
#207
#207
gsvol said:
My link provides well documented, extensivly footnoted texts vs what your brainwashed opinion with absolutely nothing to support your absurd accusations.

Get real for a change.

You call me a bumpkin, you're too stupid for intelligent discourse, and that is intuitively obvious to even the most casual of observers.

Your sources are more accurate? What source do you quote to claim the nazis weren't a bunch of sexual devients who praised and indulged in homosexuality?

Is English your native language?? You should have said "between you and me" instead of saying "between you and I."

BTW, if you think you are going to make me 'shut up' you are fighting a lost cause.

Another thing, I am more likely to shoot you between your beady little eyes than I am to shoot myself in the foot.
Click to expand...

Your link is bunk, like most of the others you post on here. Your sources are all biased agenda pages or blogs... that has zero credibility, you crazy, old coot. Just because a page contains information you'd prefer to be true doesn't make it a good source, dude. My 'brainwashed' links as you so call them are more often than not academic/scholarly sources.

All apologies for my one grammatical error. I guess I'll have to extensively pay more attention to my studies in order to refrain from any more prepositional deviants. I'd HATE to come off as uneducated. It might lead to me spelling like a child when I'm in my 80's, or whatever the hell your age is... only to turn around and criticize others' mastery of the English language in order to alleviate the pain of my failed arguments... much like yourself.

And before you try and represent the opinions of the most "casual of observers," you might want to take your naivety into account and remember just who has been painted as a fanatical loon in not only this thread, but these entire boards. Here's a hint, chief... It sure ain't me.

I'm sure you're a crackshot with that pea shooter, Dirty Harry. :eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol::eek:lol:
 
#211
#211
bam15 said:
Didn't you hear?

It's a communist ploy to destroy the military. Heck, they must have allowed the wikileaks to occur as well.
Click to expand...

Wikileaks, must be some kind of VD found in the gay community.
 
#212
#212
KB5252 said:
Wikileaks, must be some kind of VD found in the gay community.
Click to expand...

No doubt the government purposely used the gay community to spread a VD to good ole white, straight Americans in attempt to erase them from the earth so that they can rule the world.
 
#213
#213
Gays can serve openly and now we're losing the interwebs.

Communism, I tell ya. Straight up Communism.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#216
#216
BearCat204 said:
Yet you are convinced that gays go around raping people
Click to expand...

i'm not saying that, but there will intances when that will happen and it will not help the unit morale and readiness.

but is seems the morons on here that support this could care less. We need the military to act just the same as the civilian society. America's enemies are just licking their chops now.
 
#217
#217
joevol320 said:
i'm not saying that, but there will intances when that will happen and it will not help the unit morale and readiness.

but is seems the morons on here that support this could care less. We need the military to act just the same as the civilian society. America's enemies are just licking their chops now.
Click to expand...


Over exaggerate much?
 
#218
#218
bam15 said:
Didn't you hear?

It's a communist ploy to destroy the military. Heck, they must have allowed the wikileaks to occur as well.
Click to expand...

Well that guy was pretending to listen to Lady Gaga, so maybe he was gay. I'm sure someone will look into this closely.
 
#220
#220
lumberjack4 said:
Well that guy was pretending to listen to Lady Gaga, so maybe he was gay. I'm sure someone will look into this closely.
Click to expand...

lol, dude, they who leaked the info was gay. from his own words, he had a fight that morning with his boyfriend and was angry. that was when he decided to download the info to give to the wikileaks guy. you should research some
 
#221
#221
joevol320 said:
i'm not saying that, but there will intances when that will happen and it will not help the unit morale and readiness.
.
Click to expand...
You have any link from a source other than "I hate gays, Jews, women, and the black man", that has a legitimate claim that gay rape will occur more often than straight rape?

Also, if I am considered a "moron or fool" in your book, I feel I am doing pretty well in life.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#222
#222
joevol320 said:
i'm not saying that, but there will intances when that will happen and it will not help the unit morale and readiness.

but is seems the morons on here that support this could care less. We need the military to act just the same as the civilian society. America's enemies are just licking their chops now.
Click to expand...

Are you saying we shouldn't allow gays to participate in civilian society as well?
 
#223
#223
You've been on this rock for nearly 40 years and you really believe that our enemies are "licking their chops" because we have gays in the military? I mean, that's the reason. Simple as that?
 
#224
#224
joevol320 said:
lol, dude, they who leaked the info was gay. from his own words, he had a fight that morning with his boyfriend and was angry. that was when he decided to download the info to give to the wikileaks guy. you should research some
Click to expand...
So he leaked the info because he was gay? Funny, my sexual orientation isn't asked on my SF 86.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#225
#225
joevol320 said:
lol, dude, they who leaked the info was gay. from his own words, he had a fight that morning with his boyfriend and was angry. that was when he decided to download the info to give to the wikileaks guy. you should research some
Click to expand...

So did his gayness made him hate America, or did he just snap like heterosexuals sometimes do?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top