hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 114,586
- Likes
- 162,808
Do you really think the information would have been made public if he went through proper channels?
You think the government would just say, "you're right, it is unconstitutional to spy on US citizens".
If it were me, I would have tried to get it into the hands of a few reporters from different outlets in secrecy. Not been an attention whore and absolutely not have given anything to a foreign power.
Amazing how long deapthroat kept his anonymity.
If I were a gambling man I would bet you that government spying on US Citizens has been going on for many years,more than you have lived, and will continue after you are long gone.
I waiting on your justification for Snowden to give sensitive information to Putin.
That doesn't mean you should accept it, gramps. That's my real problem with this story. No one blames the government officials (the actual traitors) everyone blames the man who exposed them.
It's assumed that he did. Probably just character assassination by the government. But even if he actually did, what other option did he have? Either meet their demands or be extradited to die. Not a hard decision to make.
If I were a gambling man I would bet you that government spying on US Citizens has been going on for many years,more than you have lived, and will continue after you are long gone.
I waiting on your justification for Snowden to give sensitive information to Putin.
So he was worried more about everyone knowing he was the hero over protecting my freedom?
I blame the government. I blame Snowden for the way he went about exposing the government. There are no heroes or innocents on either side.
Meh. Im sure he doesn't have issue with being a "known" man.Or maybe he thought putting a face and a name with the story would make it more believable than using the old "an anonymous source".
But if your biggest complaint is that he gave a video interview, you're seriously just nitpicking because you have no real complaints to make.
That doesn't mean you should accept it, gramps. That's my real problem with this story. No one blames the government officials (the actual traitors) everyone blames the man who exposed them.
It's assumed that he did. Probably just character assassination by the government. But even if he actually did, what other option did he have? Either meet their demands or be extradited to die. Not a hard decision to make.
No I would not. A NDA with the USG is not consisidered a contract.......at least not the way you are making it out to be.If a contract is related to illegal activity it makes the contract void.
For example I can't kill someone and have you sign a NDA if you witness it. Our contract would be void because it's based in illegal activity.
Why would the same rule not apply here?
Meh. Im sure he doesn't have issue with being a "known" man.
Actually you couldn't be more right. Im trying to figure out how I have made it so long with the government hiding under my bed. So I guess in a sense you have nailed it.