OHvol40
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2008
- Messages
- 8,682
- Likes
- 4,775
Never has a university fired a coach with a top 10 incoming class. It is likely to be a top 5 by Monday. Even Fulmer's biggest haters are smart enough to see that we are addressing every single need with these recruits. Offensively, we would be set for 4 years. With the 2007 class we would be set on D for 2 more. Their problem is they know if Fulmer is kept this year, then he will likely have enough talent to last 3 more years. It sucks, but recruiting is half the job and Fulmer is covering his big behind with an awesome class.
We would be forfeiting any chance of short term success if we get rid of Fulmer and these recruits leave. We would also be selling EB and the 2007 class short by not giving them a legit shot of winning a championship. It would be the biggest waste of talent ever at UT.
We won the east last year and we all unfortunately got our hopes up. But in honesty, we have been rebuilding this whole year. New coordinators, offense, and QB. Everyone on here is jealous of Bama but lets see how they look next year with a new QB and inexperienced O line. By firing Fulmer and ruining the incoming class, we would assure ourselves back to back crappy classes. That alone will set the next coach back 2 or 3 years. If we can get Butch Davis, I say fire Fulmer because BD has a nice class himself and is admired by everyone. Any other replacement is risky and certain to set us back a long time.
I can't dissagree with anything you said, it is a tough decision between a new coach and a great class. Everyone keeps harping on CPF's inability to develop this tallent, and maybe that is true. An awsome class can also improve things dramaticly if Clawson's offense is able to take hold and the D is able to continue to improve. new head coaches are always risky, but also can be energizing.To me it is a very tough trade off because all I really want is success for the program, the path to that end is debatable.
Last edited: