95 Vol Alum
Go Big Vols!
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 63,031
- Likes
- 28,630
Give me your full name, address, and method of streaming and I'll send it to ESPN.
Haha espn isn't going to do anything... you said it was illegal...you implied to view its illegal as well. You have whole businesses like twitch, youtube, etc, let alone stuff like slingbox devices.
Learn how to search... its 2017.
http://watchsports.live/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpFpnZQjEoI
Heck he's the gumps on live stream on youtube.lol:
You need to file a criminal complaint....post your results.
Fyi... they are moving to the clemson game.lol:
lol: Of course, under your stupid theory... if you clicked on the link you are going to jail.
lol:
I guess everyone at google is going to jail as well. File a criminal complaint and post your results so we can once and for all figure out who doesn't know.
Go down to your local sheriff's office or nearest fbi office, pretty please.
It's not up to the viewer to know what content is paid for or authorized....its no different than turning on a TV with OTA and a local station playing something they didn't paid for...the viewer has no duty or obligation....let alone someone saying its stealing...nothing is stolen.
Literally, your stupid theory would put everyone that has used the internet in jail.
So, if you steal a hammer from Lowe's, but Lowe's doesn't pursue it, your theft was both legally and morally acceptable?
There is no hammer to steal in this instance...so there is nothing to return.... no theft. Go down to your choice of law enforcement offices and file a criminal complaint....come back here and post your results.
What are you talking about? Who am I supposed to final a criminal complaint against and where? If your knowledge of the law so limited that you don't understand something as simple as complaints and jurisdiction?
Oh I understand completely, you claimed these were stealing....its your stupid theories not mine. Of course nothing is going to happen....just like I said.
It is not a theory. If you take a product, or pirate a service, that is owned by someone else, and you do so without the owner's permission, you are stealing.
If you are okay with stealing from ESPN, the NCAA, etc because you have a problem with how they do business, then just be okay with stealing from them. Don't type long screeds of nonsense and claim that stealing isn't stealing. Just be okay with it.
If something is stolen...than one can file a criminal complaint even locally...in this instance there is nothing stolen to report missing. Lol
Espn and the ncaa have nothing to report as missing so there is no theft.
I cannot phone up my local police department and file charges against someone whose identity I don't know, for stealing something I don't own, in a place of which I am unaware. If you think doing so is possible, you are the absolute last person who should be commenting on legal issues.
Your understand of copyright is as poor as your understanding of criminal complaints.
Haha, if something is stolen, you don't need the name of the person who stole it....most people don't. Lol
Literally your stupid theory would have everyone that has access to the internet in jail....
apparently you believe these are all crimes, are you a coward by not reporting?
lol:
Please go to the police and report these stolen items, report back.
Even if you believed you had ownership of the work, knew the person, and they were local...your complaint of theft would be laughed at, as nothing is missing to report a theft.Haha, if something is stolen, you don't need the name of the person who stole it....most people don't. Lol
Literally your stupid theory would have everyone that has access to the internet in jail....apparently you believe these are all crimes, are you a coward by not reporting?
lol:
Please go to the police and report these stolen items, report back.
Even if you believed you had ownership of the work, knew the person, and they were local...your complaint of theft would be laughed at, as nothing is missing to report a theft.
A viewer has no duty or obligation to assist you in protecting your perceived work, the police would really be laughing about that.
So you believe that copyrights are unenforceable?
Even if that were true and you don't have legal obligation to avoid pirated broadcasts, it is still morally wrong to utilize a pirated service.
You are right in that, even though they could, ESPN is not going to waste resources going after individual viewers. But just because you are unlikely to ever face consequences doesn't mean that you aren't doing something wrong. Right and wrong are not defined by consequence.