milohimself
RIP CITY
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2004
- Messages
- 48,891
- Likes
- 29
MAYBE one but I cannot see more than that
I think it's much more likely to be multiple than zero.I don't think it's a one and done deal.
We're better than that. Neither of those teams would have any shot at topping a World Cup group, making the quarterfinals of a World Cup, or reaching the final of a Confederations Cup, all of which we've done in the last 10 years.Looking at the field in the European championships, we are most definitely more on par with Poland and Ireland.
I don't think it's a one and done deal. Looking at the field in the European championships, we are most definitely more on par with Poland and Ireland.
We have the population that if we ever do get to the point where we can put together a team that can go deep in the world cup (or the Copa Americas idea!) then it will be because we put together the development programs to get it done, meaning we will be cemented as a world power.
The times when you see countries like Denmark or Sweden have brief periods of excellence is a result of them having quality development but insufficient population to produce quality football.
We have the opposite problem, but a look at the consistent world powers -- Italy, Germany, France, Spain, Brazil -- show both quality development and large populations.
The population of the America is bigger than that of Italy, Germany, France, and Spain combined. It's also considerably larger the population of Brazil, who I would say is closest to matching our large population and athleticism. If we revamped our development system, we would be legitimate title contenders in less than 20 years.We have the opposite problem, but a look at the consistent world powers -- Italy, Germany, France, Spain, Brazil -- show both quality development and large populations.
The biggest question I have about Germany going forward is who will be up top. Klose seem ageless, but he's going to be 36 in 2014.
The population of the America is bigger than that of Italy, Germany, France, and Spain combined. It's also considerably larger the population of Brazil, who I would say is closest to matching our large population and athleticism. If we revamped our development system, we would be legitimate title contenders in less than 20 years.
We have the potential. Player development has a long way to go, though. Development needs huge restructuring; there's a problem when high schools and colleges are regularly out-doing even the highest level developments leagues.
Keep in mind that we didn't even have a league until very recently.The potential has almost always been there. I just don't know if the interest in the sport is there to force a change
The potential has almost always been there. I just don't know if the interest in the sport is there to force a change
I think it can happen with improved development programs. There are a handful of colleges with superior soccer development (university of portland happens to be one of them) that turn out good quality players. Problem is that it happens late, but if it can be replicated with clubs, and it slowly but surely is, then improvement will happen. The mls is only starting to come into its own, and that process will be slow because of salary caps, but thats needed. Nasl 1.0 collapsed because it didn't have any sort of policies in place to ensure competitive advantage, and could be years before it's even time to think about weaning off of that, but the model is proving to be sound so far and is encouraging better development. The organization there needs massive overhaul though. I look at bruce arena as a guy to pull that off when he's ready to leave galaxy. He was incredibly successful at uva and has shown interest in making that his pet project when he's done coaching
I think this may be one area where we would want to have a foreigner come in and help us out. Johann Cryuff helped at Barcelona. Maybe we could get some Dutch guy?