Explosions in Norway

[KiffinKiller]

Agree wholeheartedly - gs would have us behaving like a conquering army - war cries, raping, pillaging. rofl

 

[therealUT]

Agree wholeheartedly - gs would have us behaving like a conquering army - war cries, raping, pillaging. rofl

It is GS's fantasy. I can assure you that while there are plenty of great MI guys that do amazing things, most of them stay out of actual combat. They provide the intel and information that the combat arms need to plan and execute missions, and they are abl to exploit the sh** out of some debriefs and pictures. The skill is uncanny.

However, this bloodlust that GS constantly displays can only come from a person who is a sociopath and has happened to be in combat or from someone wo has only heard and read about combat without experiencing it firsthand. Seeing as he served in Vietnam where the term REMF was routinely thrown about (no real rear echelons in the first few years in Iraq), I will presume he fits the latter category. It is sad because someone who missed out on combat should feel quite happy and privileged; it seems he has some issues of desire there, though.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[KiffinKiller]

It is GS's fantasy. I can assure you that while there are plenty of great MI guys that do amazing things, most of them stay out of actual combat. They provide the intel and information that the combat arms need to plan and execute missions, and they are abl to exploit the sh** out of some debriefs and pictures. The skill is uncanny.

However, this bloodlust that GS constantly displays can only come from a person who is a sociopath and has happened to be in combat or from someone wo has only heard and read about combat without experiencing it firsthand. Seeing as he served in Vietnam where the term REMF was routinely thrown about (no real rear echelons in the first few years in Iraq), I will presume he fits the latter category. It is sad because someone who missed out on combat should feel quite happy and privileged; it seems he has some issues of desire there, though.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Sociopaths are usually able to manipulate others though - gs seems like the one manipulated...you know all the copy/pasting and not having own ideas.

 

[therealUT]

Mr Breivik is a psychopath who violently abused the war against Islamization.

Geert Wilders, as quoted today in the WSJ.

Abused the war against Islamization? How does one go about abusing the cause of a war by using violence? Geert must be upset with either the kind of violence he used or the selection of his victims. If Breivik had killed Muslims, the direct target in a war against Islamization, what would Geert be saying at this moment? Probably something along the lines of "bravo".
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[KiffinKiller]

Were in a war against Islam? News to me.

 

[therealUT]

Were in a war against Islam? News to me.

According to GS's man Geert we are. Interesting thing is, GS labels terrorism as almost exclusively Islamist; if Muslims are the enemy, then won't GS use and support terrorism, just like Breivik? Of course, GS would be sure to target Muslim women and children, not non-Muslim, white persons.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[gsvol]

Lest this thread get off topic and become about me,
here is a good article on Breivik.

Pajamas Media The 5 Biggest Lies Told about Oslo Shooter Anders Breivik

(Barack Obama has a lot of simlilarities to #5.)

5. We Can Blame Breivik’s Violence on Being Abandoned by His Father.

In Breivik’s case, his father, Jens Breivik, an elite Norwegian diplomat (!!!), left when he was one year old. He rarely saw Anders, and when Anders thereafter tried to meet with him, his biological father rebuffed him.

He wants strong macho men to be the ones to fight off Muslim-on-infidel rapists and does not view women as capable of defending themselves. He views women as too peaceful and submissive to fight real wars.

4. Breivik Is Crazy.

Unlike the Unabomber, Breivik was not a loner. He got out. He socialized. True, he still lived at home with his mother…

3. Breivik’s Zionism Is Fused with Fascism, Proving that for Today’s Neo-Nazis the Muslims Are “the new Jews.”

Ironically, the Norwegian teenagers were being indoctrinated into anti-Israel activism on their idyllic island. There are many photos which show them holding banners saying, “Boycott Israel,” “Break the Siege of Gaza,” and “Tear Down the Apartheid Wall.”

2. Right-Wing Massacres Are the Same as Islamist Jihadic Massacres.

Kaczynski was not religious, nor was McVeigh and nor is Breivik.

And then we have Islamic or Islamist jihad which has launched more than ten thousand, probably at least fifteen thousand terrorist attacks against other Muslims, and against infidels (Christians, Jews, Hindus, Zoroastrians, Buddhists) — especially against innocent and unarmed Israeli civilians.

Also, historically, in the name of Islam, jihadists have colonized vast territories in the Middle East, Asia, Africa, and India. They have persecuted, enslaved, exiled, or murdered the indigenous infidels who once lived there and either destroyed their holy sites or transformed them into grand and gracious mosques.

Nevertheless, Western political leaders, the media, and the professoriate have focused only on Western imperialism, racism, and historical slavery and have absolutely refused to focus on Muslim imperialism, racism, and historical and contemporary slavery.

Meanwhile, the steady penetration of Islamic gender and religious apartheid continues apace in the West, especially in Europe, including in Norway.

1. The Anti-Jihad Bloggers and Intellectuals Are Responsible.

Breivik turned on what he viewed as a fifth column, the Norwegian elite. They had the power to insist that Muslim immigrants speak Norwegian and embrace European Enlightenment values. They refused to do so. His message to Norway’s “progressives” is chillingly clear. Their teenage children, already well indoctrinated, will not live to carry out what Breivik viewed as their parents’ failed multi-cultural policies.

Writers work with words; killers write in blood. Breivik could have read all our anti-jihadic work. Like the Dutchman, Geert Wilders, he could have run for public office or launched an educational campaign. True, he would have had to live with being demonized as a racist and criminally sued; ironically, Breivik’s violent approach has led to a similar outcome. Breivik could have made a film about the normalized violence against Muslim-European girls and women at the hands of their families or about the honor killing of Muslim-Norwegian women— but Breivik might have risked the Dutchman Theo van Gogh’s fate and been butchered by an Islamist. Breivik could have penned some fairly innocuous “Mohammed” cartoons, as the Swede Lars Vilks did — but he would have had to live in hiding and with round the clock security. Or, like Lars Langballe, a Danish parliamentarian, he could have spoken his truth and been prosecuted for “hate speech,” just as Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was in Austria.

There are other ways to “run with” the anti-jihadic expose of how Islamic gender and religious apartheid has penetrated Europe, why this is important, and what is at stake.

 

[therealUT]

Lest this thread get off topic and become about me,
here is a good article on Breivik.

Pajamas Media The 5 Biggest Lies Told about Oslo Shooter Anders Breivik

(Barack Obama has a lot of simlilarities to #5.)

The first two are truths or lies, according to that article? Either way, it is very poorly written and once again demonstrates that you will find any excuse t distance yourself from this man, yet you will not allow the same excuses for Islamist terrorists:

Many have abondonment issues.
Many are sociopaths.
Many claim to be Muslim or believe in an Islamic moral platform.

You can deny that you think Breivik was a Christian all you want; he stated he was part of the Knights Templars and that he believes in a Christian moral platform; there are Christians who are searching for a personal relationship with Christ, yet they do not have one. Would you count them as non-Christians? Remember, this would remove the entire concept of "faith" from Christianity.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

 

[KiffinKiller]

I was baptized but don't have a relationship with Christ. Am I christian?