Faux science of global warming doesn't pass legal scrutiny.

#101
#101
that link is but one example of the many things that are being pushed to a "tipping point," btw.
 
#102
#102
50 yearas ago we were headed to an ice age, now it's a melting phase, next it wll be dreamsicles. I'm waiting for the dreamsicle one ... that will be fun.
 
#103
#103
Internet Provider Orange have you had a good burger lately?

I know a nice little pub up near Central City CO that serves a mean dead cow.
 
#105
#105
TennTradition said:
What does Gore have to do with the Ozone layer?
Click to expand...

Gore is the one who has been flying all around the country in his G6 pushing the crap. The other thing is the ozone layer "thinning" wasn't even discovered until about the 1985. We have no way to know if it is meant to grow and shrink or what it is doing.

Global Warming is a scam to control the masses through other avenues.
 
#106
#106
Ihatethebuckeyes said:
Hole in Ozone Layer Shrinks 30 Percent | LiveScience

Thought it was suppose to be growing ... fast.

Just another hockey stick graph to make science look how ever Gore needs it to so he can profit the most of morons.
Click to expand...

"This year's ozone hole was less centered on the South Pole as in other years, which allowed it to mix with warmer air," van der A said. Because ozone depletes at temperatures colder than -108 degrees Fahrenheit (-78 degrees Celsius), the warm air helped protect the thin layer about 16 miles (25 kilometers) above our heads.
Click to expand...

If you read more recent findings (your link is from 2007), you'll find that while the ozone is slowly recovering, that 30 % gain had to do with quote above, more than anything.

Furthermore, the ozone hole has nothing to do with Al Gore, or global climate change. Deja vu.
 
#108
#108
Ihatethebuckeyes said:
Gore is the one who has been flying all around the country in his G6 pushing the crap. The other thing is the ozone layer "thinning" wasn't even discovered until about the 1985. We have no way to know if it is meant to grow and shrink or what it is doing.

Global Warming is a scam to control the masses through other avenues.
Click to expand...

It's chemistry. We know that ozone absorbs UV rays, and CFC's and their ilk prevent ozone from persisting. It isn't rocket science.

And again, this is totally separate from global warming.
 
#112
#112
IPorange said:
It's chemistry. We know that ozone absorbs UV rays, and CFC's and their ilk prevent ozone from persisting. It isn't rocket science.

And again, this is totally separate from global warming.
Click to expand...

I agree they are different but the media is lumping them together. I also believe the ozone layer is not thinning and noone can find actual evidence that it is. In fact it is thickening.
 
#113
#113
Ihatethebuckeyes said:
I agree they are different but the media is lumping them together. I also believe the ozone layer is not thinning and noone can find actual evidence that it is. In fact it is thickening.
Click to expand...

Well ya, since CFC's have been banned for 20 years. Duh.

What do you base your "beliefs" on? What sort of data are you looking at?
 
#114
#114
Ihatethebuckeyes said:
I agree they are different but the media is lumping them together. I also believe the ozone layer is not thinning and noone can find actual evidence that it is. In fact it is thickening.
Click to expand...

Yeah...its the media lumping them together.....

....and you're the one in here throwing around ozone layer Al Gore hockey stick references.

It makes one question how much you know about the issue.

Why wouldn't the ozone layer be recovering if we have clamped down on what was damaging it through the Montreal Protocol?
 
#115
#115
IPorange said:
Well ya, since CFC's have been banned for 20 years. Duh.

What do you base your "beliefs" on? What sort of data are you looking at?
Click to expand...

My point is their is not enough date since it was only discovered in 1985 to know 100% if it is thickening by natural occurance or by any man made changes. To think a change in the ozone would take place in just a few years due to a change sounda absurd when the planet has been around as long as it has. The industrial revolution and the 200 years before that were not very eco friendly years. I am simply saying that i believe the data is fubar and I used the hockey stick example of global warming as part of the fubar part.
 
#118
#118
IPorange said:
The ozone layer was discovered in 1913. Let your ignorance on this issue sink in...
Click to expand...

the issue with the ozone layer was in 1985. And they did not have the tech to trace it before then. Seriously guy, read what I'm saying. Don't just look for the one liners.
 
#119
#119
I hope a family member of yours never gets cancer. You'd want to wait and get more data for a few years before accepting the diagnosis.
 
#120
#120
IPorange said:
I hope a family member of yours never gets cancer. You'd want to wait and get more data for a few years before accepting the diagnosis.
Click to expand...

Cute. More one liners.

You're funny.

Actually my grandmother did die of cancer from smoking.

Anything else you'd like to add IP? because last I checked I was trying to have an adult conversation with you.
 
#121
#121
You know that the ozone layer was monitored through the 1970's, right? You are saying that people are jumping to conclusions when a critical part of our atmosphere disappeared over a continent.

I'm just not sure what it would take to convince you of the existence of Nepal, if you "don't buy" this "ozone hole" thing. It's airtight science.
 
#122
#122
Ihatethebuckeyes said:
Cute. More one liners.

You're funny.

Actually my grandmother did die of cancer from smoking.

Anything else you'd like to add IP? because last I checked I was trying to have an adult conversation with you.
Click to expand...

How do you know it was cancer? Maybe the doctors just jumped to conclusions with their faulty science.
 
#123
#123
An adult conversation about science is impossible when one party refuses to use science in any meaningful way in their argument, but rather to just play devil's advocate.
 
#125
#125
IP, what is your area of study? Are you shooting for a PhD?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top