FBI Thread

[Vol737]

This would be much much better.

“Vive la France!”style! I like it.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[Carl Pickens]

 

[vols40]

Because no one has forced him to answer. The other candidates and new people have all cowered when he starts calling them despicable or whatever name is in his mind at the moment.

You must admit, Trump's support for, excuses for, and complete lack of skepticism of Putin is very odd.

Did Russia take any action towards Ukraine between 2017 and 2021? Adults have the ability to speak clearly without saying much if anything at all.

 

[85SugarVol]

So, completely obsessed with Trump. And you don't give a damn what any Democrat does. That about cover it?

So what exactly is @lawgator1 ’s position now? I’ve asked him 3 times in this thread and gotten nothing.

Collusion is a yes or no?
I’ve seen the pleas to ask Trump about Putin. Every time.

 

[vols40]

He'd have a better argument if it wasn't for the fact that Trump did, and continues, to support Putin at every turn.

This needs to be explored and Trump pressed in the issue by others seeking the nomination.

Lol good luck with that. The nomination is pretty obvious

 

[vols40]

He'd have a better argument if it wasn't for the fact that Trump did, and continues, to support Putin at every turn.

This needs to be explored and Trump pressed in the issue by others seeking the nomination.

Perhaps you can find what Mueller, Durham, Schiff, Fang Fang Fartswell and the entire mainstream media could not.

 

[hUTch2002]

Out of all of the investigations there has never been any collusion found, not 1 single person charged or even formally accused.

That’s not true hog. There was collusion. It just wasn’t from the Trump campaign.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[BreatheUT]

Is that Willis in the background?

 

[Franklin Pierce]

The Trump army reaction to this is pathetic and entirely predictable. Attack the investigation on the collusion issue -- and use that to COMPLETELY IGNORE the history of Trump kowtowing to Putin at every turn. Ignore his comments on Ukraine. Ignore his constantly taking Putin's side in every dispute.

Trump needs to explain why he always favors Putin. He should describe whether he will support Ukraine in resisting the Russian invasion. I don't know why even Trump supporters would not want to know about those things before they put him in office again.

Fake news! How liberal Commentators Blindly Dedicated HOURS to Baseless Claims that Trump colluded with Russians

Liberal commentators who pushed the claim Donald Trump colluded with Russia were delivered an embarrassing blow on Monday when John Durham's long-awaited report said there was no 'factual evidence' to justify a drawn-out FBI inquiry into the allegations.

News pundits and comedians spent countless hours rehashing the theory that Trump and his campaign officials conspired with Russia to influence the 2016 election victory over Hillary Clinton.

How liberal commentators dedicated HOURS to debunked Trump Russia collusion claim | Daily Mail Online

 

[DC_Vol]

Lock her up! Lock her up!

 

[ETV]

Media manipulation, had they done their job and held both sides accountable a good portion of the current environment wouldn’t exist.

We can all forget about the media ever being held accountable. Those days of integrity and a unbiased approach are over.

 

[ETV]

At this point it would seem to take a miracle to believe this country isn’t done.

Some high uppeople should have been looking at the end of a barrel at this point.

Those involved will never see the inside of a courtroom/senate hearings....much less see end of a barrel.

It's time to drastically reduce their budget, along with other alphabet divisions with deep rooted corruption. If that doesn't take place, on to phase two.

 

[ETV]

So what exactly is @lawgator1 ’s position now? I’ve asked him 3 times in this thread and gotten nothing.

Collusion is a yes or no?
I’ve seen the pleas to ask Trump about Putin. Every time.

You already know the answer to that question.

 

[85SugarVol]

You already know the answer to that question.

I haven’t seen it. Is he still saying Yes there was collusion?

 

[KB5252]

I believe we are done and I also believe we aren't worth saving. A national divorce is the least violent answer

A national divorce won't do the trick. If you're paying attention the real issue is rural vs urban. A divorce unfortunately won't solve this equation.

 

[KB5252]

There won’t be any violence as long as people are fat, fed, and entertained.

We are on the brink of not being able to provide for our families. The tipping point is much closer than I'm comfortable with.

 

[ETV]

I haven’t seen it. Is he still saying Yes there was collusion?

Continuing to repeat the same thing. Trump/Putin's relationship.

 

[hUTch2002]

You can always tell when there’s something good for Reps and bad for Dems as our resident Dems suddenly get very quiet. Outside of LG’s insane ranting there’s nary a one to be found.

 

[Vol737]

Those involved will never see the inside of a courtroom/senate hearings....much less see end of a barrel.

It's time to drastically reduce their budget, along with other alphabet divisions with deep rooted corruption. If that doesn't take place, on to phase two.

A Star Chamber will become necessary.

 

[hUTch2002]

Briefed about and actively supporting are two different things. Plus he has that traitor Brennan probably speaking like there was concrete evidence.

But facing facts Obama probably was like most everyone else in thinking Trump would never pull off winning and never thought it would go anywhere. And by the time the investigation really got underway, Obama was out of office.

I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and think he didn't do anything to help it. On the other hand I don't think he did anything to stop it either.

Didn’t Obama, and others in his admin like Biden and Rice, authorize spying on Trump? If he knew it was fake, and it sounds like he did, then why authorize spying unless you’re supporting the effort? Maybe I’m not remembering correctly.

 

[LouderVol]

If it wasn't intentional, why didn't it roar through sites like Mexico City or Sao Paulo or any of a thousand slum infested cities in Africa? Why were modern civilized 'clean' cities with population densities much less than those of any of the cities I mentioned hit so much harder? If FauciFlu was as virulent and contagious as they said, all it would have taken was one traveler to go into one of those places to basically burn them to the ground.

It was targeted, it was intentional, and imho it was an act of either war by the Chinese or mass murder by people like Fauci and that whole cabal.

1. Africa is typically younger, healthier, and outdoors more than we are.
2. Mexico got hit as proportionally as the US did, with most of those deaths being centered in Mexico City, and not much beyond. They are actually more obese than we are, some how.
3. Sao Paulo did get hit hard, they accounted for half of Brazils total cases.

its not some conspiracy for a disease to have "preferred" methods of spreading. this one targeted older, less active populations. if you look at the cases in Africa most of their deaths are also in the older demographic. The US trends 20 years older than parts of Africa, and while its a terrible metric BMI says we also trend a "weight class" heavier than our African peers.

I also tend to think with our reliance on medicine many western cultures had made themselves more vulnerable to diseases. Our immune system doesn't have to fight as many things, so they are less developed. Meanwhile in Africa Covid is probably disease threat number 200 they deal with, so their bodies were ready to fight it off.

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]