Federal Indictment of Donald Trump

Wow, the slight of hand was almost magician like.

We went from he makes bad hires to, he keeps making bad decisions?

It's a difference without distinction. A bad hire was a bad decision - this is why it's so tedious dealing with the likes of you. One has to explain to you easy concepts, and you still won't grasp it.

When one notes that he made a lot of bad hires, it indicates a trend of poor decision making. If this is confusing for you, ask one of the other kids in your group home day center to help explain it.
 
Trump wasn't appealing to voters in 1999. That was a conversation between two civilians, not an elected official who changed from election to election.
Trump has no principles. His shift in position had everything to do with what would best serve his future political candidacy.
 
Trump has no principles. His shift in position had everything to do with what would best serve his future political candidacy.

Fixed it to see your agenda. Candidates have no principles. Their shift in position had everything to do with what would best serve their future political candidacy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb
If that is the best you've got ... it isn't much.

you provided exactly zero support for your broad claim - zero, zip, nada. I provided direct evidence of my claim. There is plenty more but that one serves as an example.

so my weak and not much is miles more compelling than your contribution
 
I said they've been complaining he isn't taking action - provided an article that says exactly that.
You need to provide multiple articles. They need to be from reputable sources. I alone will determine what is reputable. Most of them will be dismissed so please provide an overabundance. When you feel it's enough please post them so I can discount them all as either partisan garbage or hack jobs. These ground rules are unwavering.

Thanks and have a blessed day.
 
Republicans weren't speaking out against FBI Director Christopher Wray, prior to the raid at Mar-a-Lago.

It was the same thing with William Barr, as the Attorney General. A majority of Republicans either had no opinion on Barr, or they were in favor of him, before he refused to do Donald Trump's bidding in December of 2000, and announce that the 2020 Presidential Election was "corrupt."

Yeah I think they were . Wray didn’t help himself any when he went before the senate and didn’t recognize a memo the FBI had put out with the Betsy Ross , the Gadsden , and Gonzales flags were signs of militia violent extremism.
 
Come on man. That standard won't hold for any politician. I mean Biden went from protecting his children from the racial jungle to hanging out on the corner with corn pop.
Biden went from mandatory sentence for crack cocaine to smartest guy I know.
 
Yeah I think they were . Wray didn’t help himself any when he went before the senate and didn’t recognize a memo the FBI had put out with the Betsy Ross , the Gadsden , and Gonzales flags were signs of militia violent extremism.
Betsy Ross sewed the very first American flag, right? Why do Republicans consider it a sign of militia violence? That doesn't make any sense... and why make an issue of it now after all this time anyway? Good lord.
 
Betsy Ross sewed the very first American flag, right? Why do Republicans consider it a sign of militia violence? That doesn't make any sense... and why make an issue of it now after all this time anyway? Good lord.

I believe the statement said the FBI considered it that; not Republicans
 
Betsy Ross sewed the very first American flag, right? Why do Republicans consider it a sign of militia violence? That doesn't make any sense... and why make an issue of it now after all this time anyway? Good lord.

Wrays FBI put out a memo saying those three flags were a sign of militia violent extremism. Cruz wasn’t happy and asked him what they were doing over there . He ( Wray) “ didn’t recognize “ the document. It’s on YouTube .
 
I’d like to know if there are any government officials that could hold Trump accountable without them being immediately dismissed?
 
I’d like to know if there are any government officials that could hold Trump accountable without them being immediately dismissed?

Yes all of them , any of them , at any time . They just have to have SOLID proof and it needs to be SERIOUS , not some bs crap that we all know dozens of politicians before him have gotten away with but now we are all about making ONE , stick to the rule of law . This maybe, technically, possibly, probably, if you hold your head a certain way can see it crap , won’t work after the whole Russian investigation debacle exposing the corruption in what was supposed to be one of our sacred institutions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10nacvols
Yes all of them , any of them , at any time . They just have to have SOLID proof and it needs to be SERIOUS , not some bs crap that we all know dozens of politicians before him have gotten away with but now we are all about making ONE , stick to the rule of law . This maybe, technically, possibly, probably, if you hold your head a certain way can see it crap , won’t work after the whole Russian investigation debacle exposing the corruption in what was supposed to be one of our sacred institutions.
But nobody but the DoJ and Trumps team have seen the proof and yet we have people immediately being dismissed.
 
Strange. We were told A) Trump didn’t receive a copy of the warrant or receipts, and that was proven to be a lie, and B) they weren’t allowed to witness the search, and that was also a lie.

Trump lawyer admits he watched the "whole" FBI raid on CCTV footage

I don't remember being told A - thought I read the exact opposite.

B depends on witness - the lawyer was not allowed to be present. The FBI requested the cameras be turned off but that request was denied.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85

VN Store



Back
Top