Federal Indictment of Donald Trump

#1,851
#1,851
#1,852
#1,852
clarksvol00 said:
Yeah. Except it's a freaking federal law. There are laws I don't agree with, but if I break them, I assume I have to deal with the consequences.
Click to expand...

The president is the one who determines what is and is not classified. Hard to claim he violated a federal here. Also seems very similar to the Hillary situation yet there was no fbi raid on her home, she was known to have broken the law, and yet they refused to prosecute here.

So why is this being treated different?
 
  • Like
Reactions: theFallGuy
#1,861
#1,861
Vol8188 said:
The president is the one who determines what is and is not classified. Hard to claim he violated a federal here. Also seems very similar to the Hillary situation yet there was no fbi raid on her home, she was known to have broken the law, and yet they refused to prosecute here.

So why is this being treated different?
Click to expand...
Not if he did not declassify them prior to leaving office. Also Hillary went through a massive investigation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
#1,862
#1,862
clarksvol00 said:
I'm sure it will be entertaining and filled with as much whatabouting and as many "witch hunt" accusations as this.
Click to expand...
I refer you back to the HRC threads.
They’re exactly the same with the sides and arguments flipped.

with me saying “nothing is going to happen “ mixed in
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77, tntar heel and StarRaider
#1,863
#1,863
evillawyer said:
You misspelled "golfs"
Click to expand...
For you this is like finding your Christmas present early and it’s exactly what you wanted so when you see the box under the tree you already know what you have and you’re still excited. And then you open it and find out that present you thought you were getting didn’t actually happen.
 
#1,864
#1,864
Orangeslice13 said:
I refer you back to the HRC threads.
They’re exactly the same with the sides and arguments flipped.

with me saying “nothing is going to happen “ mixed in
Click to expand...

This isn't even about Trump and what happens to him. It happened and it is not good even just for optics.
 
#1,865
#1,865
allvol123 said:
11 Laws You Could Be Breaking Without Knowing It
Click to expand...
I bought an EEPROM programmer back in the 90's and about 6 months later received a faux copy of a federal lawsuit against me for "stealing" Direct TV's signal. If I sent them $2000 they would drop the lawsuit, otherwise they would go ahead and file it and would cost me legal fees and if I lost, a judgement of $20-$40k. I cowered down and paid the money they alleged I stole from them.... Lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: allvol123
#1,867
#1,867
volfanhill said:
Not if he did not declassify them prior to leaving office. Also Hillary went through a massive investigation.
Click to expand...

So your crime is a possible oversight (we don’t even know for a fact it happened, they may be declassified)?

And you’re defending this? Would you have defended a raid on the Clinton home right before the presidential election?
 
  • Like
Reactions: theFallGuy
#1,870
#1,870
Vol8188 said:
So your crime is a possible oversight (we don’t even know for a fact it happened, they may be declassified)?

And you’re defending this? Would you have defended a raid on the Clinton home right before the presidential election?
Click to expand...
I am not defending anything bc I don't know what they are looking for or evidence they have. You dismissing off hand is pretty dumb however
 
#1,871
#1,871
hUTch2002 said:
For you this is like finding your Christmas present early and it’s exactly what you wanted so when you see the box under the tree you already know what you have and you’re still excited. And then you open it and find out that present you thought you were getting didn’t actually happen.
Click to expand...
The SAT analogy section was a struggle for you, wasn't it?
 
#1,872
#1,872
allvol123 said:
It’s just absurd. Why would you have thought it was illegal. But we have more laws than anyone can keep up with. And so discretion is used in prosecution. Which means people can then be targeted.
Click to expand...
That one is truly mind-boggling. I can understand fees and whatnot but to make it a crime is insane.
 
#1,873
#1,873
volfanhill said:
I am not defending anything bc I don't know what they are looking for or evidence they have. You dismissing off hand is pretty dumb however
Click to expand...

My stance is the same as it's been from the beginning. If you do something this extreme you better find something major. I've not waivered on that. I'm skeptical for two big reasons. One, they've not told us anything yet. Two, the entire government under Biden, especially the justice department, has been insanely and overtly political.
 
#1,874
#1,874
on the topic of too many laws - this book is entertaining


Have you ever clogged a toilet in a national forest? That could get you six months in federal prison. Written a letter to a pirate? You might be looking at three years in the slammer. Leaving the country with too many nickels, drinking a beer on a bicycle in a national park, or importing a pregnant polar bear are all very real crimes, and this riotously funny, ridiculously entertaining, and fully illustrated book shows how just about anyone can become—or may already be—a federal criminal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 85SugarVol, zeppelin128 and allvol123
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top