Federal Indictment of Donald Trump

[GoBigOrangeUT]

My stance is the same as it's been from the beginning. If you do something this extreme you better find something major. I've not waivered on that. I'm skeptical for two big reasons. One, they've not told us anything yet. Two, the entire government under Biden, especially the justice department, has been insanely and overtly political.

Wouldn’t them not telling us anything yet be more incriminating? Trump has the warrant and what they were looking for. If it was random knick knacks and a cocktail napkin, wouldn’t Trump release that? It would be a huge plus for him.

 

[Orangeburst]

It sets a new standard.
We’re going to see this again except from the other side.

I know..just agreeing with your prior posts.
Moving froward we are even more divided..to the point of ungovernable. Aint no third party President or anybody can stop this train.

 

[allvol123]

on the topic of too many laws - this book is entertaining


Have you ever clogged a toilet in a national forest? That could get you six months in federal prison. Written a letter to a pirate? You might be looking at three years in the slammer. Leaving the country with too many nickels, drinking a beer on a bicycle in a national park, or importing a pregnant polar bear are all very real crimes, and this riotously funny, ridiculously entertaining, and fully illustrated book shows how just about anyone can become—or may already be—a federal criminal.

I’m betting sexual positions are in there.

But yes, it is funny and disgusting. Might need to purchase that.

 

[Jxn Vol]

My stance is the same as it's been from the beginning. If you do something this extreme you better find something major. I've not waivered on that. I'm skeptical for two big reasons. One, they've not told us anything yet. Two, the entire government under Biden, especially the justice department, has been insanely and overtly political.

it’s not worth arguing with that guy. He will take a partial point, spin it, and go of on a random tangent. Then call you dumb for not seeing things his way.

 

[VolStrom]

so were these records ever subpoenaed or did they just go straight to raid.

That's a great question that I haven't heard asked or answered.

 

[allvol123]

That one is truly mind-boggling. I can understand fees and whatnot but to make it a crime is insane.

Federal laws aren’t about doing what makes sense.

 

[Velo Vol]

Also seems very similar to the Hillary situation yet there was no fbi raid on her home

Clinton turned over the computer. What was the FBI going to search her house for?

 

[Vol8188]

Wouldn’t them not telling us anything yet be more incriminating? Trump has the warrant and what they were looking for. If it was random knick knacks and a cocktail napkin, wouldn’t Trump release that? It would be a huge plus for him.

If they found something, wouldn't they have charged him already? I'm not convinced the warrant would actually tell us much. Just that they have permission to search.

This is year 6 of investigations and we've still got nothing. And this is from the same DOJ that has been taking openly political stances under Garland.

 

[volinbham]

That's a great question that I haven't heard asked or answered.

pretty sure the answer is there was no subpoena - which begs the question of why

 

[volinbham]

I’m betting sexual positions are in there.

But yes, it is funny and disgusting. Might need to purchase that.

It's a good bathroom or coffee table book - easy to read individual parts

 

[Orangeburst]

Clinton turned over the computer. What was the FBI going to search her house for?

Oh Lord..that forensic investigation that took a whole weekend? The FBI agents should of been awarded medals for their efficiency efforts

 

[theFallGuy]

Clinton turned over the computer. What was the FBI going to search her house for?

That's determined after they show up and look around

 

[Orangeburst]

It's a good bathroom or coffee table book - easy to read individual parts

 

[VolStrom]

pretty sure the answer is there was no subpoena - which begs the question of why

You know why, this was a political witch hunt and the witches didn't think they would get caught with their panties down around their ankles with Trump being out of town.

 

[Vol8188]

Clinton turned over the computer. What was the FBI going to search her house for?

They were provided emails not laptops, phones, or servers. They would have searched for her phones, computers, laptops, tablets, and servers.

 

[volfanhill]

so were these records ever subpoenaed or did they just go straight to raid.

Good question

 

[volfanhill]

it’s not worth arguing with that guy. He will take a partial point, spin it, and go of on a random tangent. Then call you dumb for not seeing things his way.

Ha. You don't argue or discuss. You just lash out like a 12 year old.

 

[volfanhill]

They were provided emails not laptops, phones, or servers. They would have searched for her phones, computers, laptops, tablets, and servers.

Good point

 

[theFallGuy]

pretty sure the answer is there was no subpoena - which begs the question of why

Justice Department should have subpoenaed documents, not raided Trump’s home | The Hill

 

[zeppelin128]

So your crime is a possible oversight (we don’t even know for a fact it happened, they may be declassified)?

And you’re defending this? Would you have defended a raid on the Clinton home right before the presidential election?

This board defended an FBI investigation into Hillary's emails two weeks before an election...

I don't recall there being an outcry about precedent and a bias in government when that happened.

 

[clarksvol00]

********.

You know how many federal laws exist? More than any of us can keep up with?

You ever gambled prior to online gambling or at a casino? Shared your Netflix password?

And how we doing with respect to immigration laws?

I don't gamble or share my Netflix password, but I'm curious as to the criteria you would apply to decide which laws we should or shouldn't enforce.

 

[volinbham]

Clinton turned over the computer. What was the FBI going to search her house for?

after she wiped it along with her and staff phones

 

[Orangeburst]

This board defended an FBI investigation into Hillary's emails two weeks before an election...

I don't recall there being an outcry about precedent and a bias in government when that happened.

And wrapped up over a weekend.

 

[clarksvol00]

The president is the one who determines what is and is not classified. Hard to claim he violated a federal here. Also seems very similar to the Hillary situation yet there was no fbi raid on her home, she was known to have broken the law, and yet they refused to prosecute here.

So why is this being treated different?

Seems to be an awful lot of speculation in this. What documents did Trump keep and did he declassified them before he became a former president?

 

[Vol8188]

This board defended an FBI investigation into Hillary's emails two weeks before an election...

I don't recall there being an outcry about precedent and a bias in government when that happened.

The investigation happened 2 weeks before the election because of bias in government that drew tremendous public interest. The fbi knew about the email issue and had ignored it until the public outcry forced their hand.

Surely you remember that part right?