How do I not understand the term likely. There's a line of cops in front of a building. Bullet misses intended target in the crowd. Therefore it will likely hit something behind the target....such as the cops.
You believe the majority of surface area behind the "supposed" targets was comprised of the bodies of cops?
Because I showed you how his story makes more sense than the idea of this man being a super ninja sniper trained by Eric Holder to kill cops?
The story doesn't make sense based on the distance of 140yds. To get a headshot on a target at that distance with a pistol you would have to aim almost a foot over the targets head. And nobody trains at that distance unless they're trying to do some kind of trick shot.
The problem is most places don't do ballistics tests and drops from a pistol length barrel for pistol cartridges. So the foot drop is pretty much a guess on anyone's part since round type, grain weight, barrel length and construction play into it far more than a rifle barrel.
Two hits on two separate targets at 120 yards is a trick shot. I'm with LG, I'd bet the shooter was way closer.
The story doesn't make sense based on the distance of 140yds. To get a headshot on a target at that distance with a pistol you would have to aim almost a foot over the targets head. And nobody trains at that distance unless they're trying to do some kind of trick shot.
The problem is most places don't do ballistics tests and drops from a pistol length barrel for pistol cartridges. So the foot drop is pretty much a guess on anyone's part since round type, grain weight, barrel length and construction play into it far more than a rifle barrel.
Two hits on two separate targets at 120 yards is a trick shot. I'm with LG, I'd bet the shooter was way closer.
Seriously though, do you believe this guy hit his targets or not? Because you seem to believe he's some sort of super sniper, right?
Well, let's see...
You're saying he likely missed his intended target, likely missed everyone else in the crowd and likely by chance hit two separate cops that likely weren't standing shoulder to shoulder?
That makes way more sense than being closer than was reported and intentionally targeting the cops. I'm glad you made this so clear to me.
I'm simply saying the story reported could work. You're changing the current information to fit your own narrative.
And depending on the depth of the crowd, it's very possible that the bullet missed everyone in the crowd. And I'd say the cops were very likely standing nearly shoulder to shoulder.
If I'm so obviously wrong, then explain.
So me trying to break it down to you, a person that's already made their mind up as to what happened and how it all went down, would be redundant on my part.
Read the thread, the answers are there.
You claim to be a math teacher of complicated theorems and algorithms and what not ..... Do the math..... guy shoots into a crowd.... Somehow he misses everyone except....wait for it...... Two Ferguson cops that everyone is protesting and showing their hatred of.....what are the odds?