‘23 FL OT Lucas Simmons (FSU commit)

#401
#401
Mightyvol said:
Well, Metalvol said we were a “ Hat on the table.” Waiting to see if his opinion changes before I get too optimistic.
Click to expand...
There are a lot of posters who don’t know squat but their opinions are taken seriously due purely to the fact that they are on this site more frequently than others. There are also a lot of pessimists/BVS posters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolFaninFla and ACvol3
#402
#402
vol_in_ga said:
There are a lot of posters who don’t know squat but their opinions are taken seriously due purely to the fact that they are on this site more frequently than others. There are also a lot of pessimists/BVS posters.
Click to expand...
They also post confidently as though they DO know stuff lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ACvol3
#404
#404
peaygolf said:
b90fc5f23aeb35d45152f60bc3140ac5.gif
Click to expand...
Your really getting good at the gif game!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brillovol, hooter vol, OrangeShade and 5 others
#405
#405
ALStateLineVol said:
Just a guess but we allocated our NIL allotment designated for FM to Lucas, Sham, & Ramil?
Click to expand...
Most will say that we take all three, but I believe that we take just two of those three. FM would of been great because he brought more versatility and could of played guard. Those three are very good tackles, plus we already have another tackle body in this class. I still bet that Simmons and Sham are our first two choices and Ramil will be the odd man out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ALStateLineVol
#407
#407
BullsGap said:
Most will say that we take all three, but I believe that we take just two of those three. FM would of been great because he brought more versatility and could of played guard. Those three are very good tackles, plus we already have another tackle body in this class. I still bet that Simmons and Sham are our first two choices and Ramil will be the odd man out.
Click to expand...
I figured all 3 were a take and we'd be done with OL.
Thanks,
 
  • Like
Reactions: OrangeShade, JacketVol, Woodlawn VOL and 2 others
#408
#408
BullsGap said:
Most will say that we take all three, but I believe that we take just two of those three. FM would of been great because he brought more versatility and could of played guard. Those three are very good tackles, plus we already have another tackle body in this class. I still bet that Simmons and Sham are our first two choices and Ramil will be the odd man out.
Click to expand...
You take all three. Especially with the chance of Darnell leaving after the season. There’s a question mark next year at both LT and RT. You can as many tackle bodies as possible imo
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brillovol, Orange., OrangeShade and 3 others
#413
#413
SJAVol32 said:
You take all three. Especially with the chance of Darnell leaving after the season. There’s a question mark next year at both LT and RT. You can as many tackle bodies as possible imo
Click to expand...

The OT spot opposite Wright likely will not be a question mark going into 2023 because it will be answered in 2022 by Mincey or Crawford. I’d also love to see RJ Perry come along. He has all the tools. Between those 3, hopefully, you have two good starting OTs and a solid backup for 2023. That way, we’re not relying on freshmen for anything more than depth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brillovol, Orange., hooter vol and 5 others
#417
#417
GregAmsler said:
The OT spot opposite Wright likely will not be a question mark going into 2023 because it will be answered in 2022 by Mincey or Crawford. I’d also love to see RJ Perry come along. He has all the tools. Between those 3, hopefully, you have two good starting OTs and a solid backup for 2023. That way, we’re not relying on freshmen for anything more than depth.
Click to expand...
This. 100%
 
  • Like
Reactions: 825VOL, Smokey19rt and jakez4ut
#418
#418
GregAmsler said:
The OT spot opposite Wright likely will not be a question mark going into 2023 because it will be answered in 2022 by Mincey or Crawford. I’d also love to see RJ Perry come along. He has all the tools. Between those 3, hopefully, you have two good starting OTs and a solid backup for 2023. That way, we’re not relying on freshmen for anything more than depth.
Click to expand...
Wouldn’t that be nice. To not always have to count on freshmen or transfers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TennacJed, Brillovol, Orange. and 8 others
#419
#419
GregAmsler said:
The OT spot opposite Wright likely will not be a question mark going into 2023 because it will be answered in 2022 by Mincey or Crawford. I’d also love to see RJ Perry come along. He has all the tools. Between those 3, hopefully, you have two good starting OTs and a solid backup for 2023. That way, we’re not relying on freshmen for anything more than depth.
Click to expand...
agreed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey19rt
#420
#420
GregAmsler said:
The OT spot opposite Wright likely will not be a question mark going into 2023 because it will be answered in 2022 by Mincey or Crawford. I’d also love to see RJ Perry come along. He has all the tools. Between those 3, hopefully, you have two good starting OTs and a solid backup for 2023. That way, we’re not relying on freshmen for anything more than depth.
Click to expand...
Let's just hope we like the answer, cause I'm not sure we will.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top