papatomany
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2010
- Messages
- 2,248
- Likes
- 1,263
First drive of the second half, they went 16 plays, but we held them to a field goal. Holding penalty killed the second drive. Fumble killed the third. So, I respectfully disagree. In spite of being whipped --especially line play on both sides of the ball -- Bennett misses one of those, Hooker hits one of those, and no flukey 75 yard punt skipping out at the one, and it's a ball game.Umm no, it wasn’t a few plays. Georgia played conservatively in the 2nd half. They were averaging 40 points a game, and could’ve done the same if we made those plays.
Yea and in years past UGA would have been able to run up and down the field on us. They didn’t do that yesterday.Mehhh..it doesn't quite work like that. Georgia changed their gameplan to be ultra conservative and run clock in the 2nd half because they were up. Until that point we really hadn't stopped them much. There is no knowing how the game would have changed had we been able to score on offense.
Yes I see this year has been Hyatt has been wide wide open down behind safeties to take the edge off the defense. He didn't get as many early and when he didn't catch them I think the rest of the game he went back to last years Hyatt of not getting off the first 10 yards of coverage as the Georgia corners were physical with him.I think it’s a stretch to say Hooker “usually” makes them. Overthrows have been an issue this year. Just hasn’t cost us games until now.
Consecutive 3-and-outs is not the goal of conservative play calling. Georgia got a field goal to start the second half and didn’t get another first down until the last drive of the game.Mehhh..it doesn't quite work like that. Georgia changed their gameplan to be ultra conservative and run clock in the 2nd half because they were up. Until that point we really hadn't stopped them much. There is no knowing how the game would have changed had we been able to score on offense.
Ass kicking. Score does not indicate how bad we got beatTennessee got manhandled on both sides of the ball. It wasn't even as close as the score would suggest. UGA had several drop passes that were touchdowns and overthrown balls as well. They went into clock management mode the second half otherwise it would've been much uglier. Bennett only through four passes the second half because he didn't need to do anything else since the game was so obviously in hand. Tennessee got beat by a much better team. Everyone forgot that UGA was second in total offense in the country. So you put together a top five offense and defense and this is what it looks like. Tennessee is having one of those unexpected years just like Cincinnati last year for instance.
I didn’t see UGA go ultra conservative until midway through the 4th. We had stops in the first half too. Their first scoring drive was impressive. After that I felt like we defended them well, other than when our DB fell down and gave up the long TD.Mehhh..it doesn't quite work like that. Georgia changed their gameplan to be ultra conservative and run clock in the 2nd half because they were up. Until that point we really hadn't stopped them much. There is no knowing how the game would have changed had we been able to score on offense.
yeah I think that’s the point of the thread. If the results of those 4 plays go our way the score is much closer. We might still have lost but once we settled down we were actually competitive despite shooting ourselves in the foot with false start penalties.Never mind HH being sacked 5 times in a row?
Consecutive 3-and-outs is not the goal of conservative play calling. Georgia got a field goal to start the second half and didn’t get another first down until the last drive of the game.