Good grief. Sankey is not much bigger than Young, at all.He's a lot like Bishop Shankey except Shankey is bigger, can pass block, and can actually run well between the tackles, but sure.
Sure.
Why not.
Everyone likes to skewer stats to help their arguments on the internet LOL. Happens every single day on here.
"Reasonable contributions" I am not debating.
Whether he is on the same level of a Sproles or Beckham or would he be a viable tailback were Lane and Hurd went down is highly debatable IMO.
There are valid points on both sides. Devrin has not done much in his career at UT, no splash plays, no punt or kickoff returns to speak of, certainly no long game changing tds. Yet, he helped stabilize the return game during Dooley's reign of terror when the effing idiot couldn't identify or develop a guy who could even field a punt.
All reports are that Devrin has done well this offseason and fall camp and that he'll contribute out of the backfield on some "special package" plays, however, I agree with JGA... if we get to where he's our first option at RB we're in trouble. He'll help in measured doses IMHO, not as a primary ball carrier.
Similarly, while he's a reliable, serviceable return guy who will do a solid job and get us in decent field position with good decisions and decent return yardage, he hasn't shown himself to be a dynamic returner thus far. Personally I'm fine with him back there, but would prefer a more dynamic big play guy back there and I'm hoping that one emerges to take those duties over. I recall thinking that Dale Carter was gonna take one to the house every time he returned a punt back in the day. I'd like to see a player like that returning kicks again and thus far DY just hasn't been that. Who know though, maybe he becomes that his senior year....looks like he's gonna be the guy so I hope he is.
Of course it is debatable... It is being debated right now because NONE of us have the ability to KNOW that the team will be in serious trouble if this or that happens. IMHO, he won't become the primary RB. The coaches will have to look for help elsewhere rather than expanding his role to 15+ carries per game if Hurd and Lane get hurt. But Young's ability is being recognized by this staff. That really ISN'T debatable.Exactly.
No problem whatsoever with him as our primary return guy but it would be nice to have better options. Carter was exactly who I was thinking of during this little debate.
And if he becomes our primary RB, this team is in serious trouble. I don't think that is debatable.
Question whether a player is an all pro, hall of fame, NFL level talent and the Vollyannas have to come out in force with their media guides choock full of stats, fan card check list, and their pressurized sunshine though.
Ummm, basically because I read what you wrote.No. How you infer this from anything I have said is beyond me.
And unlike you, I have kept the same screen name so people would know who I am. I don't mind having been wrong or having made comments that I'd rather have back. I've learned and had fun in the process.Of course, I have felt you are FOS roughly 90% of the time going back to your GVX days as well.
Who said it was by default other than you? The coaches moved Young from slot to RB. They wanted him there and have praised him since moving him there.I am not arguing the depth chart as Young is third by default at this point.
Until he performs like them... I'd agree. That does not mean he's untalented like you keep suggesting.I am saying Devrin Young being compared to the likes of Darren Sproles or Beckham is downright foolish.
I'm not sure the stats of any player over the past couple of years really defines what they'll do this fall. Jones says that the culture has changed. He's now deeply into implementing his program and schemes. At this point, I choose to defer to his judgment.Touting stats he padded against the likes of Austin Peay and Buffalo really doesn't impress me either.
Saying he hasn't made plays is significantly different from what you are doing. You are saying he CAN'T make plays... and you seem to be saying it as a "truth claim" and not just your opinion.I'll ask it again, how many game changing plays has this player ever made? That's what we should be aspiring for out of the return game.
Of course it is debatable... It is being debated right now because NONE of us have the ability to KNOW that the team will be in serious trouble if this or that happens. IMHO, he won't become the primary RB. The coaches will have to look for help elsewhere rather than expanding his role to 15+ carries per game if Hurd and Lane get hurt. But Young's ability is being recognized by this staff. That really ISN'T debatable.
No one did that though... nor did you just question whether he had "all pro, hall of fame, NFL level talent". You've basically said he's worthless.
I'm just wondering why the main focus is whether DY is a good 3rd string?
For some Nancy's on here, berating=actually telling the truth about a player.
Young is a mediocre punt returner but is about useless as a RB.
He can catch the ball which is good but has shown little shake or true burst in his time here. Nothing that is gonna make anyone think explosive player.
Of course it is debatable... It is being debated right now because NONE of us have the ability to KNOW that the team will be in serious trouble if this or that happens. IMHO, he won't become the primary RB. The coaches will have to look for help elsewhere rather than expanding his role to 15+ carries per game if Hurd and Lane get hurt. But Young's ability is being recognized by this staff. That really ISN'T debatable.
No one did that though... nor did you just question whether he had "all pro, hall of fame, NFL level talent". You've basically said he's worthless.
I have said no such thing. Quite the contrary actually.
I said he I don't see anything in his resume to indicate he is an explosive threat in the return game to justify comparisons to NFL players.
I also said I don't see him as a legit option as a full time RB
But...whatever argument you think you need to do to inflate your e cred is fine by me.
I could care less.
I think Young is a serviceable, not great, player at best like many on this team and, no matter how many quotes and bullet point responses you pull out or inferences you make due to a lack of reading comprehension, really isn't gonna change my opinion.
I think Young is a serviceable, not great, player at best like many on this team and, no matter how many quotes and bullet point responses you pull out or inferences you make due to a lack of reading comprehension, really isn't gonna change my opinion.
Not much to infer there. You said it. Own it. It's disingenuous to lie about what you've said, and a bit useless when it's there for all the world to see.
Or do you want to reply now and pick nits about the difference between "useless" and "worthless"?
I'll be glad to own that I said Young was about useless as a running back.
.
My reading comprehension is fine. In fact, if you had only said that Young was a good but not great player then we wouldn't have had this round. As Orange Crush demonstrated... you are either trying to squirm out of what you said or somehow aren't expressing your opinion clearly/consistently.
Yeah... except for the fact that when I challenged you a little on it you went ballistic and refused to "own it". I have SPECIFICALLY been talking about the fact that Jones and staff see him as having a role at RB. THEY have confidence in him apparently. You now reaffirm that you consider him "useless as a running back". So... are you wrong or is Jones wrong?
Again, your argument isn't with anyone here. No one here has the ability to give DY reps at RB... only Jones does... and HE has.
I'll be glad to own that I said Young was about useless as a running back.
Of course, if you want to argue that a player that has 155 rushing yards and 113 receiving yards in 3 seasons is going to somehow morph into an NFL level talent this year, be my guest and join the club.
I'm not the one trying to run from my own words...Ballistic? Wow. I am not the one dissecting posts and going on point by point diatribes here.
Apparently, it's a challenge for you though. Internet is certainly serious business today it seems.
And because a player may not excel at running back doesn't mean he can't have some limited value as a return guy.
You chose not to acknowledge the distinction I clearly made earlier on that point in your latest manifesto.