No spin just the truth, Phil was a solid recruiter until he got complacent around 2001-2002. When Cut left for Ole Miss, Phil never felt as comfortable with Sanders calling the plays. He started focusing more on offensive schemes (OC) and less on recruiting (OL "his strong suit").
When the 2005 season blew up and Phil forced Sanders to resign, Randy became the scapegoat that Phil needed to buy some time. Cutcliffe was fired in 2004 and Phil knew he needed someone he trusted with his offense. He goes out and gets Cut to come back for the 2006 campaign. Phil then realizes how far the talent had gone down during the time Cut was gone.
Unfortunately for Phil after the 2007 campaign Cutcliffe would become the next HC at Duke after showing the country he still had it during those 2 years with the Vols going 9-4 then 10-4 in 2007. It also shows looking back now that either Phil had indeed been to involved in the offense or Randy Sanders was terrible even though he was the one who coached us in the NC game.
The hiring of Clawson in 2008 was a terrible hire for Phil, the offense was a total cluster ****. Players could not line up properly, the frustration from both players and coaches was clearly noticeable. The weakness of the OL stood out like a sore thumb and that was always a trademark of a Fulmer OL to be just the opposite (lack of recruiting on Phils part)
So to answer your question Volfanecs. all Phil had to have done was maintaine, he didn't and the damage was done.