While that holds true, just like what I said, I could've said 3 of his last 5, 4 of his last 6, 5 of his last 8 (one 8 win), etc. as well. Just shows you what picking and choosing does in an argument, which most anti Fulmer posters tend to do. No one has yet to answer the question of what good has come from firing him.
Not necessary to answer that question. PF was on a downward slide and he would have had a difficult time, just as difficult, as Kiffin or Dooley (well, maybe not Dooley) in achieving many more,
"IF ANY" wins. Check out his last four years production, vs. the previous four. A DOWNWARD SLIDE. He did win 58% of his games the last four years, including those 9 and 10 win seasons, still only .580. That is why his coaching career was terminated. The best thing to come out of his termination is that he could not slide along,
dragging the program farther downhill. And clueless MH's decision on choosing his successors is what led to the current disaster. Fulmer, arguably would have done little better, maybe a win or two more at best, considering his .580 performance. After all, even with a decent couple of recruiting classes from 02-08, he couldn't even reach the top 5 or top 10, even missing the top 20 three times.
