whobethis16
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2010
- Messages
- 6,291
- Likes
- 3,198
You don't quite understand the definition of trend.....and I keep waiting for the Fulmerites to step up and recognize that he was headed downhill. The numbers don't lie, but the heart may. This thread is like NCIS......at first all the shows get a rerun, then only 75% and eventually they get down to about 10 or so that they keep showing. He was good, he got lazy, he is gone, we are TRYING to move on. Why can't we just let it go.
IMO it's not about bringing him back at this point. The fact that some still choose to attack our (Tennessee Volunteers) HOF coach is unexceptionable. I don't blame anyone for defending Fulmer I would expect them to and would be disappointed if they didn't.
Now Fulmer is not our head coach everyone knows this. He's not coming back. So why does anyone feel the need to degrade his coaching career?
You all say you like winners. Yet you expect fans to lie down and allow people to degrade their favorite UT coach. He is the 2nd in line behind Neyland in wins. That deserves some respect and if some of you don't want to give it to him then I say piss on you.
IMO it's not about bringing him back at this point. The fact that some still choose to attack our (Tennessee Volunteers) HOF coach is unexceptionable. I don't blame anyone for defending Fulmer I would expect them to and would be disappointed if they didn't.
Now Fulmer is not our head coach everyone knows this. He's not coming back. So why does anyone feel the need to degrade his coaching career?
You all say you like winners. Yet you expect fans to lie down and allow people to degrade their favorite UT coach. He is the 2nd in line behind Neyland in wins. That deserves some respect and if some of you don't want to give it to him then I say piss on you.
Really?? Really??
1) Figure out how to post before you piss on someone you shouldn't. Don't worry 16, I know who he is pissing on even if he doesn't.
2) I have had nothing but GOOD things to say about CPF's career here. Saying he got lazy at the end to me isn't degrading nor is it unexceptionable (wtf are you talking about). The fact of the matter is that he was in a downward spiral and showed no signs of improving.
3) It gets old listening to the people on here that won't accept the fact that many of us don't have him on a pedestal and worship him. If you want to go through life pissing on people that don't agree with you, then when you get crapped on, don't complain.
Really?? Really??
1) Figure out how to post before you piss on someone you shouldn't. Don't worry 16, I know who he is pissing on even if he doesn't.
2) I have had nothing but GOOD things to say about CPF's career here. Saying he got lazy at the end to me isn't degrading nor is it unexceptionable (wtf are you talking about). The fact of the matter is that he was in a downward spiral and showed no signs of improving.
3) It gets old listening to the people on here that won't accept the fact that many of us don't have him on a pedestal and worship him. If you want to go through life pissing on people that don't agree with you, then when you get crapped on, don't complain.
because kiffin and dooley were busts, fulmer lovers want phil back? hmy: he started losing too much--that's why he got fired.
Really?? Really??
1) Figure out how to post before you piss on someone you shouldn't. Don't worry 16, I know who he is pissing on even if he doesn't.
2) I have had nothing but GOOD things to say about CPF's career here. Saying he got lazy at the end to me isn't degrading nor is it unexceptionable (wtf are you talking about). The fact of the matter is that he was in a downward spiral and showed no signs of improving.
3) It gets old listening to the people on here that won't accept the fact that many of us don't have him on a pedestal and worship him. If you want to go through life pissing on people that don't agree with you, then when you get crapped on, don't complain.
Evidence? Like the last four years of 29-22, 17-16 in conference? That kind of evidence?
Like I have said, the only reason I post these stats is because most of you guys pick his last 4 years to say that his next four years would have been worse. You guys use history to say he wouldn't be any good had he stayed, but when I use it make a logical claim, it's tossed to the side?
It is pretty clear that PF was on a downward slide with two losing seasons in his last four, but those two seasons were bookends for a 9 win and 10 win seasons. So, how about those two winning seasons? Calculate it and you will find that those two 9 and 10 win seasons were average, in the case of the 9 wins, and very slightly above average in the case of the 10 wins, based on UT's all-time winning percentage. So, one could say that PF was only, "marking time," for his last four years, two average seasons and two considerably below average, as in "losing seasons." The rest of the SEC big five were going full speed ahead, not marching in place.
It is pretty clear that PF was on a downward slide with two losing seasons in his last four, but those two seasons were bookends for a 9 win and 10 win seasons. So, how about those two winning seasons? Calculate it and you will find that those two 9 and 10 win seasons were average, in the case of the 9 wins, and very slightly above average in the case of the 10 wins, based on UT's all-time winning percentage. So, one could say that PF was only, "marking time," for his last four years, two average seasons and two considerably below average, as in "losing seasons." The rest of the SEC big five were going full speed ahead, not marching in place.
Math isn't your strong point is it? UTs all time percentage is .684. When going 9-4, the percentage is .692. A 10-3 record is .769 and 10-4 is .714. So every year, Fulmer was above the average.
Pre-Fulmer the average was .655. Through 2004, the average increased to .676. When Fulmer was fired it was down to .672. And since firing him, it is down to .684.
Edit: overall percentage is .663, not .684 based on dividing total wins by total games (799/1206).
Like I have said, the only reason I post these stats is because most of you guys pick his last 4 years to say that his next four years would have been worse. You guys use history to say he wouldn't be any good had he stayed, but when I use it make a logical claim, it's tossed to the side?