peoples perspectives are different..
93-98 record was 63-7 (won't see at UT again in our lifetime, you and me).
99-08 record was 85-39 (your words, "running it into the ground") which we all would love to have seen these last 15 years.
09-23 record has been 90-81 since Hamilton fired Fulmer. Debates will rage long after you and I are gone who is to blame for this period. You likely blame Fulmer while I will blame Hamilton / Haslam. Hamilton doesn't make it happen without Haslam blessing.
We are all different and opinions differ based on our knowledge learned.
I think Fulmer deserves some credit for building that program as well. He had a lot to do with recruiting and coaching before he became the head coach.
But doing it as CEO of the program is an entirely different type of responsibility. When a program dips a little, as it did in the early 2000s, rebuilding as the Head Coach requires a more rounded and thorough skill set. Many of Fulmer's staunchest defenders believe he would have gotten the program back to it's elite status, with those opinions being derived from nothing but gut feelings. There were no concrete data points that indicated we were going back up. In fact, having had 2 losing seasons of his last 4, it looked like the back end of his career would be mired in mediocrity.I think Fulmer deserves some credit for building that program as well. He had a lot to do with recruiting and coaching before he became the head coach.
Major college football allows no let up when you are at the top. When you lose the edge, it can take a long time to regain it. Momentum is EVERYTHINGBut doing it as CEO of the program is an entirely different type of responsibility. When a program dips a little, as it did in the early 2000s, rebuilding as the Head Coach requires a more rounded and thorough skill set. Many of Fulmer's staunchest defenders believe he would have gotten the program back to it's elite status, with those opinions being derived from nothing but gut feelings. There were no concrete data points that indicated we were going back up. In fact, having had 2 losing seasons of his last 4, it looked like the back end of his career would be mired in mediocrity.
The visible slide had been going on since the SEC title game loss to LSU in 2001. We were the proverbial frogs in a slowly heating pot of water and no one pulled the plug until the damage was severeYes, I am aware of the momentum factor. Sort of my point. There weren't any signs in 2008 that we were headed back to elite status with CPF
No.We should have given Fulmer a sabbatical.
ridiculous..... program is bigger than both of them combined.....2 deserving CFB HOF coaches, but neither of their success at UT was mutually exclusive of the other.Fulmer actually built the program; not Majors. Just look at the program one he became that OC.
Yes, but 10 years from now.He actually needs a statue at Neyland for all that he accomplished!
Only two coaches in Tennessee Vols football history have won even a single national title. One of them was the General, who brought home three or four, depending on how you count them.
The other is Philip. He's not a rock star. He was a talented player, but as a lineman he was not in the limelight. As a head coach, he "only" won one national title (and two SEC crowns). He was linked in history with a fella, Spurrier, who always seemed to be one step ahead. And then he was a bust as AD.
In spite of that, the man is still the second-best coach in Vols football history. He won three-fourths of his games, even with a couple of bad years among the 16 seasons he was in charge.
Those of us who lived through his tenure owe the man some warm regard, which seems to be more than a significant cabal here are willing to grant. It hurts nothing to say, "thanks, Coach, we appreciate you." Doesn't take a statue. Just a bit of courtesy to someone who gave us nice things.
Thanks, Coach Fulmer. We appreciate what you did for us. Some of us remember.
Go Vols!
Only two coaches in Tennessee Vols football history have won even a single national title. One of them was the General, who brought home three or four, depending on how you count them.
The other is Philip. He's not a rock star. He was a talented player, but as a lineman he was not in the limelight. As a head coach, he "only" won one national title (and two SEC crowns). He was linked in history with a fella, Spurrier, who always seemed to be one step ahead. And then he was a bust as AD.
In spite of that, the man is still the second-best coach in Vols football history. He won three-fourths of his games, even with a couple of bad years among the 16 seasons he was in charge.
Those of us who lived through his tenure owe the man some warm regard, which seems to be more than a significant cabal here are willing to grant. It hurts nothing to say, "thanks, Coach, we appreciate you." Doesn't take a statue. Just a bit of courtesy to someone who gave us nice things.
Thanks, Coach Fulmer. We appreciate what you did for us. Some of us remember.
Go Vols!
Fulmer does deserve our respect for what he did on the field. However all any Vol fan needs to know was after he was gone, not nary a single other P5 program in the country was willing to make him their HC, not one wanted him!!
There's a reason for that. I'm not sure I know why or what the truth was behind it, however it's as much of his legacy as his NC win.