ACvol3
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2010
- Messages
- 22,000
- Likes
- 30,881
I might get bashed for this, but I think we have to hire Petrino now. This is a golden opportunity to get a top notch coach who can bring us back to the top.
it doesn't take a genius to look at his record, and know he was a winner..
a .75% winning percentage isn't even hard for "idiots" to understand
your problem is cherry picking what you want to from his record, to try and devalue his contributions
And you're not giving any detail to the 75% winning percentage. Here's some advice for you: Stats are meaningless without detail.
A really accurate measure as to how well someone did as a coach is how they leave the program as compared to how they got it. You can't argue with the fact that Fulmer left the program in fractions of how he got it in 1992. He got a loaded roster with quality depth and left one not so loaded with little depth.
No, she was paid 14, or 17 thousand to take her whore A** somewhere else. That matter is resolved. She, and he are yesterday's news.
And you're not giving any detail to the 75% winning percentage. Here's some advice for you: Stats are meaningless without detail.
A really accurate measure as to how well someone did as a coach is how they leave the program as compared to how they got it. You can't argue with the fact that Fulmer left the program in fractions of how he got it in 1992. He got a loaded roster with quality depth and left one not so loaded with little depth.
lets see, when they talk about Bowden in Football or Pat Summitt and Dean Smith in Basketball exactly what metric do they mention...
I believe it's number of wins, is it not
So why bash a coach that has 152 of them at the University you support along
with SEC Chamionships and a National Championship