'20 GA ATH Arik Gilbert (LSU commit)

[TrippieRedd]

All I’m going to say is, I hope y’all don’t mind me sparking a blunt at Neyland once weed is legal. Make sure y’all research 2nd hand smoke from those “professionals” LMAO

 

[SweetasSoda]

All I’m going to say is, I hope y’all don’t mind me sparking a blunt at Neyland once weed is legal. Make sure y’all research 2nd hand smoke from those “professionals” LMAO

I mind! I'm allergic to smoke. I get a headache for 3 days.

 

[drvenner]

lol I bet none of them have actually tried it. Again, living and breathing proof vs. some nerds that never used it.

Do you drink? Legit question

I don't know enough to know if it's harmful or not. I do know that if you use it and say it does not affect you in any negative way, if it were affecting you negatively, long - term, would you actually know or realize it. Also, Bama can suck it. (just throwing that last part in general in all of my posts today).

 

[SSVol]

Then what you do is worse than what I do. Like you said, if you’re cool with it, then be cool

I specifically said I wasn't anti-weed. I'm responding to your incredibly illogical statement that the people doing the science are wrong because they don't do weed, and your equally illogical statement that because you perceive no ill effects, that it has none. You're claiming no effects to cognition, while simultaneously exhibiting poor logic. You're kinda proving the point, and then doubling down on it.

 

[drvenner]

You’re dismissing what we are saying because you’re looking at research made by those that have never tried it.

You can study just fine without actually trying it. Pretty much all prescribed medication research, development and approval is done without actually trying the drug. Your point that they have never tried it is completely irrelevant as it pertains to if they are able to study it.

 

[Otis1105]

You can study just fine without actually trying it. Pretty much all prescribed medication research, development and approval is done without actually trying the drug. Your point that they have never tried it is completely irrelevant as it pertains to if they are able to study it.

They don’t do clinical trials on medications?

 

[TrippieRedd]

They don’t do clinical trials on medications?

They do. Once again, none of them actually know what they are talking about

 

[Blackburn]

Yay, more debates about non-football related stuff on my favorite team's football forums.

I hope we get Gilbert. We could use a potentially dynamic TE on our roster

 

[T Dog]

Gettin errybody high on them real sticky icky icky clouds.

 

[drvenner]

They don’t do clinical trials on medications?

They do. But the researchers are not actually trying the drug. I'd say some groups studying weed had study participants as users also.

 

[drvenner]

Yay, more debates about non-football related stuff on my favorite team's football forums.

I hope we get Gilbert. We could use a potentially dynamic TE on our roster

Me too. You can also just scroll on by the posts you aren't interested in. It's what I do.

 

[InVOLuntary]

You can recognize the positives of weed and at the same time recognize that inhaling smoke can be a negative. Anyone that disputes that inhaling smoke, chronically over a long period of time increases your chances of developing some form of lung disease as you age, really loses all credibility in my eyes. I don't care what you do with your body but as with anything, too much of a good thing carries consequences somewhere down the line.

 

[SSVol]

You can recognize the positives of weed and at the same time recognize that inhaling smoke can be a negative. Anyone that disputes that inhaling smoke, chronically over a long period of time increases your chances of developing some form of lung disease as you age, really loses all credibility in my eyes. I don't care what you do with your body but as with anything, too much of a good thing carries consequences somewhere down the line.

It is amazing to me how people are almost incapable of nuanced non-binary thinking. Everything is either fully good or fully bad and they die on those hills daily.

 

[Blackburn]

Me too. You can also just scroll on by the posts you aren't interested in. It's what I do.

I have been but I didn't see any posts on the subject of this thread over the last few pages. Thanks for your helpful web browsing tips. You could have scrolled past my comment but you didn't so here we are.

 

[ABINGDON VOL FAN]

You’re dismissing what we are saying because you’re looking at research made by those that have never tried it.

How do you know they haven’t tried it ? I believe the majority of people who reached maturity from the 60’s forward have tried it. Your naivety is on display again.

 

[ThreatLevelOrange]

Would uga blatantly tell him he doesn’t h e to go to school amd they’ll be able to keep him eligible? That’s the million dollar question. There’s obviously a whole lot of sleaziness going on between the hedges. Uga is the only team that’s recruited with Ohio state, Bama, etc that has had multiple opportunities at the trophy. Uga hasn’t matched the in the field production as those other teams yet have recruited just as well as any of them. How is that possible?
The other question would be if a guy like AG could possibly sit out for the next 2 years and then still end up a 1st round selection. He’d likely have to go play with some other pro organization to make that happen. Guys can miss their junior year when they’ve proven themselves to be elite. I can’t recall anyone sitting out starting at their sophomore season.

It didn’t work out for Maurice Clarett, for sure.

 

[Nuctech777]

It was news reports within the last year. I would have to Google it now so you can do the same.

That’s not how making claims work. If you make the claim, you have to defend it. Otherwise, it can be dismissed as fiction.

 

[ABINGDON VOL FAN]

I specifically said I wasn't anti-weed. I'm responding to your incredibly illogical statement that the people doing the science are wrong because they don't do weed, and your equally illogical statement that because you perceive no ill effects, that it has none. You're claiming no effects to cognition, while simultaneously exhibiting poor logic. You're kinda proving the point, and then doubling down on it.

I specifically said I wasn't anti-weed. I'm responding to your incredibly illogical statement that the people doing the science are wrong because they don't do weed, and your equally illogical statement that because you perceive no ill effects, that it has none. You're claiming no effects to cognition, while simultaneously exhibiting poor logic. You're kinda proving the point, and then doubling down on it.

 

[ABINGDON VOL FAN]

That’s not how making claims work. If you make the claim, you have to defend it. Otherwise, it can be dismissed as fiction.

They are out there. I found the reports in about 10 seconds after my original post you are responding to, ....and they are from credible organizations like the CDC.

 

[UTMVol76]

I mind! I'm allergic to smoke. I get a headache for 3 days.

I went to the Bama game in Tuscaloosa last year. You would not like it.

 

[SmokinBob]

Anything that is not clean air is not good for your lungs. Proving something inhaled caused lung cancer is difficult because everyone inhales some known and unknown carcinogens every day. You are welcome to believe it is harmless but I know better. Inhaling any kind of smoke into your lungs is not good. My dad is sitting in his recliner right this second. He's on oxygen and can barely make it to the bathroom and back even with oxygen on. When he does it takes him 5 minutes to recover. He has idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and has about 20% of his lungs left. He never smoked cigarettes or pot. It's probably from his younger days working as a body man, breathing in bondo dust, fiberglass and paint. His doctor has given him a year or so. It's terrible to see your dad struggling to breath. "Idiopathic" means that they don't know what causes it. I am 100% convinced breathing in marijuana smoke or any smoke for that mater is not good for your lungs.

Hugs to you and your dad.

 

[SmokinBob]

This right here. Using medicinal marijuana (flower, topical, and sublingual) has a ton of proven medical benefits. There is a trade off with inhaling flower. But it can partially be mitigated with pranayama practices.
I am the Director of Wellness for a breast cancer nonprofit. I create individualized medical marijuana treatment plans in conjunction with oncologists, dispensary doctors, and other medical professionals to help patients during treatment and during recovery (and yoga, exercise, meditation, and pranayama routines).
If you how and where it was grown and the specific strain, I can match the terpene profiles to help with specific issues. There are even anti-carcinogenic terpenes. I typically suggest sublingual and topical. The edibles can be a crapshoot unless you make them yourself.

Would you be willing to tell us where you are located? I understand if not.

 

[drvenner]

They do. Once again, none of them actually know what they are talking about

Come on. Are you saying that they have to participate in their own trials to research effectively? I know exactly what I am talking about. I am simply refuting your point that you have to y use it to make a judgment it's harmful. I personally think it should be legal for recreational use, but that does not mean I have to try it to make that my opinion.

 

[drvenner]

I have been but I didn't see any posts on the subject of this thread over the last few pages. Thanks for your helpful web browsing tips. You could have scrolled past my comment but you didn't so here we are.

I agreed with your last point about Gilbert. And, you're welcome. Bama can suck it.

 

[HalfullVol]

do you guys realize TONY BOLOGNA started this thread Aug 2016?

time for this to die