HoleInTheRoof
Elite ★★★★★ Poster
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2009
- Messages
- 22,550
- Likes
- 152,145
How are these the "two clear cut defensive backs at the top of the board?"
How are these the "two clear cut defensive backs at the top of the board?"
I'm not saying they are bad but how are there not some 5 stars or high 4 stars on the board before these 2. One of which isn't ranked and the other is a low 4 star composite guy.
I know many will say "rankings don't matter" but they do. You don't see the echelon with these 2 at the top of there board.
How are these the "two clear cut defensive backs at the top of the board?"
I'm not saying they are bad but how are there not some 5 stars or high 4 stars on the board before these 2. One of which isn't ranked and the other is a low 4 star composite guy.
I know many will say "rankings don't matter" but they do. You don't see the echelon with these 2 at the top of there board.
Jeremiah Cobb finally got rated and is a top 130 recruit. Kaleb Webb was in the 1000s and is now a top 250 recruit. It's way too earlyHow are these the "two clear cut defensive backs at the top of the board?"
I'm not saying they are bad but how are there not some 5 stars or high 4 stars on the board before these 2. One of which isn't ranked and the other is a low 4 star composite guy.
I know many will say "rankings don't matter" but they do. You don't see the echelon with these 2 at the top of there board.
They matter... but not in the way or to the extent you think.How are these the "two clear cut defensive backs at the top of the board?"
I'm not saying they are bad but how are there not some 5 stars or high 4 stars on the board before these 2. One of which isn't ranked and the other is a low 4 star composite guy.
I know many will say "rankings don't matter" but they do. You don't see the echelon with these 2 at the top of there board.
Why are Alabama, Georgia, LSU, OSU and others pushing hard for them?They matter... but not in the way or to the extent you think.
The reason these guys are at the top of the board (assuming that's true) is that professional coaches and the recruiting consultants UT pays to vet and evaluate players... believe they're the best two CB recruits.
How are these the "two clear cut defensive backs at the top of the board?"
I'm not saying they are bad but how are there not some 5 stars or high 4 stars on the board before these 2. One of which isn't ranked and the other is a low 4 star composite guy.
I know many will say "rankings don't matter" but they do. You don't see the echelon with these 2 at the top of there board.
If UT ever gets out of the ditch... the HC will do three things really well when it comes to talent. He will recognize guys with 3* ratings and 5* talent. He will find talent and develop great relationships BEFORE others notice. He will develop talent well.Why are Alabama, Georgia, LSU, OSU and others pushing hard for them?
You have absolutely NO way of knowing that. None. Well over half of any draft will be made up of guys the recruiting sites gave 3 stars or less. IIRC, there are as many players that they don't even rank in most drafts than former 5* players. If your authority is the recruiting sites... it isn't a very good one.This is my point. Because there are alot better players ahead of them.
And? I hope Heupel NEVER waits for the recruiting sites to confirm his opinions on player talent. That is a route to Butch Jones style failure.Yes maybe by the end some will push for these 2 after they miss out of several others. But they aren't as of now.
Maybe you don't know this but every major football program hires recruiting consultants. They are highly expert football guys who will review every scrap of film. They'll dig up every social media post. They'll talk to people and see what the reputation of the kid is. They'll talk to coaches, referees, friends, enemies,.... anyone who will talk. By the time they're done, coaches get a full profile to go with their own evaluations of talent, personality, character, temperment, etc.I'm not saying they won't be good at some point but as of right now neither have even been offered by the teams I mentioned so why are these the top of our board?
That's true... but it also seems to be code with those two guys. They don't say things like that very often unless they're pretty sure it will make them look good if confirmed or denied.You do realize that VQ said the words “in our minds” right? Hubbs and AP don’t have access to the recruiting board. They are guessing. Pleas show us the upper echelon teams boards.
Understand this, I have not said we shouldn't have offered them. But my question is why haven’t the upper echelon at least offered. At this point even if the upper school hadn't seen their film, they have by now because Tennessee offered.If UT ever gets out of the ditch... the HC will do three things really well when it comes to talent. He will recognize guys with 3* ratings and 5* talent. He will find talent and develop great relationships BEFORE others notice. He will develop talent well.
You have it exactly reverse. If Bama, UGA, et al were pushing hard for these guys then they'd have higher ratings. Like others, you somehow think a handful of journalists at the recruiting websites find and independently evaluate all those 4/5* players then Saban and the gang go chasing after them. Few if any of those journalists has actually coached a college level football player. They do not have the expertise to recognize the nuances that make one guy an elite football player and another just a great athlete.
The recruiting site guys can go to camps and compare players and SPARQ scores. For the rest... they just pay attention to who is recruiting who.
You have absolutely NO way of knowing that. None. Well over half of any draft will be made up of guys the recruiting sites gave 3 stars or less. IIRC, there are as many players that they don't even rank in most drafts than former 5* players. If your authority is the recruiting sites... it isn't a very good one.
And? I hope Heupel NEVER waits for the recruiting sites to confirm his opinions on player talent. That is a route to Butch Jones style failure.
Maybe you don't know this but every major football program hires recruiting consultants. They are highly expert football guys who will review every scrap of film. They'll dig up every social media post. They'll talk to people and see what the reputation of the kid is. They'll talk to coaches, referees, friends, enemies,.... anyone who will talk. By the time they're done, coaches get a full profile to go with their own evaluations of talent, personality, character, temperment, etc.
IF these guys are at the top of UT's board then people with years of experience and elite expertise have put them there.
It is ALWAYS better to get on a recruit early. ALWAYS. If you or someone else identifies a problem then you can always back away. If you want a coach that follows Saban and Smart around hoping to gather some of their scraps... then we're just not looking for the same kind of coach.
Morley was a great player.@reVOLution33 I'm a gray beard so I have been watching this all play out for a long time. UT has in the past prioritized and signed some 4 and 5 star guys that the recruiting sites were giddy over. I'll list some names for you... just 5* for now.
Kenny "The Spotted Ape" O'Neal
Chris Donald
Demetrice Morley
Brandon Jeffries
James Banks
Ben Martin
Bryce Brown
DeAnthony Arnett
Kahlil McKenzie
Kyle Phillips
As a Vol fan you might recognize some of those names... but hopefully you'd agree that none of them deserved 5*.
UT for now isn't going to win a bunch of head to head recruiting battles for 5* guys with Bama. But there is MORE than enough talent besides those guys who the top programs see as 5* players to win. The coach who turns UT around will find more than his share of them and then will develop them into great players.
Maybe because they don't like them for THEIR programs as well as other players? Maybe they haven't taken the time to evaluate them. Maybe one coaching staff or the other is just WRONG about those 2 guys. But I think I gave you a pretty thorough answer. If these guys are truly at the top of the board then they have been thoroughly vetted and the coaches believe in them.Understand this, I have not said we shouldn't have offered them. But my question is why haven’t the upper echelon at least offered. At this point even if the upper school hadn't seen their film, they have by now because Tennessee offered.
Based on? Has the staff been lazy or careless? If so, how?I believe they are at the top of the board because our staff feels they are the most realistic prospects we can land, and if so that is lazy and honestly bad practice.
Jones was a used car salesman. He was always concerned with hype and image. It had nothing to do with "system"... he seemed to think recruiting rankings would translate directly into wins and program momentum... much like you it seems. Do we really need to review the players that he, Rivals, and 247 thought were 4/5* worthy who busted?Butch Jones recruited players that didn't fit his system.
In what way does Pruitt's ability or inability to correctly evaluate one player relate to the current staff or any of their recruits?Jeremy Pruitt recruited his "guys" Warren Burrell was his number 1 and see where that has gotten us.
Dooley wasn't necessarily "lazy" but he had some ideas about recruiting that just don't work... and especially not at UT. He said in a presser that he wanted to recruit well but also wanted his coaches to have a "home life". As a result, they didn't compete well. Whereas UF jumped in their car and spent one say meeting with 6 or 8 prospects, UT's coaches spent two days traveling for every day of recruiting then Dooley lowered that expectation.Derek Dooley only recruited skill players.
Did he? Some were good. There were a bunch of busts too.Kiffin did a good job recruiting but was only here 1 year.
I won't fault you for being "cautious" but what you have said here isn't caution. You've drawn a bunch of negative conclusions based on incomplete information. You've assumed the worst without good reason to do so.Hopefully, heupel can take a card from all of them and come out on top. I'm just cautious.