Devo182
"Well Known Member" TWSS
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2015
- Messages
- 39,749
- Likes
- 137,570
That's just not true. In some of these cases, there is considerable back-and-forth, with multiple requests for additional documentation or clarification of information. Some of this documentation is sourced from peripheral parties, including physicians, family members, etc., depending on the case. It takes a considerable amount of time to put together a complete package, and complex cases move slowly, especially when the previous school isn't cooperative. So the timeline on this case is impacted by numerous things and people outside UT's control.
Furthermore, the case file passes through compliance, legal, outside consultants and the AD. So alleging that UT screwed it up is saying that the university has many layers of bunglers and no checks and balances. And while that may be an opinion, it's not factual.
You tell me. Yer an expert at reading beyond what was actually said to argue about what was "actually" said without being said in yer own head. Which is how this whole thing started. You took a simple quote from Pruitt about supporting MO's transfer and turned it into a huge semantics debate where semantics only apply to anyone but you. Go back to the annex and think about what you've done.
This is a perfect analogy for how Harbaugh puts words in transfers mouths changing the reason they've given for transfering into his own interpretation of it being playing time.Come on it’s a simple yes or no but I’ll help you with the truth. Just answer unless of course you know the masses have made itt clear you are wrong
The answer is easy. NO
@InVOLuntary Isn’t it funny he won’t answer?
Here is mostly what I have learned on VolNation this afternoon...……....that Bruin can hang onto an argument like an ingrown toenail caught in shag carpet. …...or hang in there like a hair in a biscuit.
If butchna is wrong, he just says he's wrong, I've seen it several times.Bruin vs Butchna. Who would die of starvation first during a never ending 1 vs 1 argument?
View attachment 219912
This is a perfect analogy for how Harbaugh puts words in transfers mouths changing the reason they've given for transfering into his own interpretation of it being playing time.
Figured you’d know the answer...since you know everything else. Teach us to blueshirt bruh.Bruin vs Butchna. Who would die of starvation first during a never ending 1 vs 1 argument?
View attachment 219912
Or you can say all those things and say the kid wants an opportunity to play and we think he should get it. As long as the previous school supports the waiver it will be approved. I think that's why so many of these questionable waivers are being approved. Like tate. Ryan day probably supported his decision to leave for playing time.
Absolutely impossible! You were GIVEN INFORMATION!So you think it’s impossible for the university of Tennessee to have screwed something up in Aubrey’s paperwork basically?? I would disagree with you there, people mess up everyday regardless of the checks and balances in place to prevent it. You think it’s just a long drawn out process, and I think they screwed up on the first waiver and had to resubmit it and now harbough is digging his feet in.
So you think it’s impossible for the university of Tennessee to have screwed something up in Aubrey’s paperwork basically?? I would disagree with you there, people mess up everyday regardless of the checks and balances in place to prevent it. You think it’s just a long drawn out process, and I think they screwed up on the first waiver and had to resubmit it and now harbough is digging his feet in.
Haha I kept expecting him to bump that one. Still different than what he was claiming and not at all the point or relevant. I had response ready though. HahahahaSo I bit the bullet and went back, here's what Sleegro actually said. And even this was about the letter, not the waiver like Bruin has been claiming for half a day.
I'm sure everyone is as shocked as I to learn Bruin changed "what started the argument" and pretty much the entire context of everything since.