'17 GA DT Aubrey Solomon (NCAA IS A FAIR ORGANIZATION)

#2,455
#2,455
GiggerVol said:
Bruin, how do take that snippet as what you claim Sleegro stated as fact? I bet you go to bed each night arguing with yourself! All Sleegro, Glitch and others have tried their damdest to get in your thick skull is that if both schools communicate and cooperate together, regardless of the players' reason for transfer, in most cases the ncaa approves the damn thing! Go look in the mirror and argue with yourself!
Click to expand...


It’s simple:

If schools cooperate if a player is willing to claim a “mitigating”/“extenuating” circumstance beyond his control he likely will get a waiver


The player has to use more than wanting more playing time as that circumstance if they want to be successful in getting a waiver.

Anyone that argues with that is dead wrong
 
#2,457
#2,457
BruinVol said:
@InVOLuntary here he is saying that playing time is all you need for a waiver
Click to expand...
I think you're reading into his post more than he's implying. I think we all know the real reason for these transfers is for some or more playing time. I also think we all know that that is not the stated reason when applying for a waiver.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nash_Vol97, Sleegro and GiggerVol
#2,459
#2,459
Richard I mean Colson Yankoff 😜😂 transferred within the same conference like Gibbs did. No way he should get eligible.
 
#2,460
#2,460
InVOLuntary said:
I think you're reading into his post more than he's implying. I think we all know the real reason for these transfers is for some or more playing time. I also think we all know that that is not the stated reason when applying for a waiver.
Click to expand...


Well let’s ask him again


@Sleegro if a school supports a player that makes a waiver request saying he wants more playing time with no other circumstances listed in the waiver will he receive a waiver???
 
#2,461
#2,461
Exactly
I think you're reading into his post more than he's implying. I think we all know the real reason for these transfers is for some or more playing time. I also think we all know that that is not the stated reason when applying for a waiver.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SweetasSoda and Sleegro
#2,464
#2,464
GiggerVol said:
Exactly
I think you're reading into his post more than he's implying. I think we all know the real reason for these transfers is for some or more playing time. I also think we all know that that is not the stated reason when applying for a waiver.
Click to expand...

Agreed

But he’s said that is the reason stated. Even said Pruitt stated it in MOs letter
 
#2,470
#2,470
coskramer said:
Richard I mean Colson Yankoff 😜😂 transferred within the same conference like Gibbs did. No way he should get eligible.
Click to expand...
What's the difference? If we are against controlling players that have a good waiver case, why is that a barrier?

Now, the main difference imo is coaches are REALLY going to be phallic noggins when it is in-conference. But it again comes back to the previous coach controlling the kid over good arguments for a waiver. I mean, if Osborne was having his baby and is 1 class from graduating and the baby was in Lexington, KY, why shoudn't he get the waiver to play for a conference foe? It could certainly happen, but it is suddenly going to be made tougher by the coach (not saying Pruitt necessarily would, just used MO as an example) and has to get the SEC commissioner's signature on it. Why? We all know why, mostly rhetorical...
 
#2,471
#2,471
Devo182 said:
I remember a Tony B rumor our compliance botched some paperwork. AV flew in and squashed it.

I feel like if some piece of paperwork was messed up, that wouldn't be a huge issue causing all this but who knows.

I feel like GBO is making a bigger point, like we filed a poor case completely or filed the wrong kind of waiver. He said "huge disservice". Quite an insinuation.
Click to expand...

This truevol I am insider is full of BS. Even Mars states we have the best compliance department ect but MUCH weight is given to the school being transferred from and Tony B don’t know which plane is Lovies and which one is AV’s.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sleegro and SweetasSoda
#2,472
#2,472
BruinVol said:
Well let’s ask him again


@Sleegro if a school supports a player that makes a waiver request saying he wants more playing time with no other circumstances listed in the waiver will he receive a waiver???
Click to expand...
You tell me. Yer an expert at reading beyond what was actually said to argue about what was "actually" said without being said in yer own head. Which is how this whole thing started. You took a simple quote from Pruitt about supporting MO's transfer and turned it into a huge semantics debate where semantics only apply to anyone but you. Go back to the annex and think about what you've done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ridgerunner Vol, Orangeredblooded, TrueVolsGBOInsider and 2 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top