'17 GA DT Aubrey Solomon (NCAA IS A FAIR ORGANIZATION)

[Sleegro]

You won a popularity poll but lost the intelligence one where facts are important. Lol

You standing by your post and saying LA is wrong ?

Are you standing by yer posts that Pruitt is a liar and Harbaugh's the pillar of truth? The people have spoken. Since none of us including LA, you, this weird true insider guy or me have seen the letters, the poll is the only way to determine who won. Go back to the annex flenderson. I'm starting to think yer the scranton strangler.

 

[InVOLuntary]

Only on VN can poster be dead ass wrong and think he is right because the poster pointing out the obvious truth is hated

Lol

The problem with your stance, Bruin, is that you've equated mitigating and extreme. To me extreme takes it to a whole different level. Mitigating us much broader in what could be allowed. Much more gray area with mitigating. As a matter of fact you could use "extreme mitigating" circumstances and it takes it to a different level.

I agree if a players sole reason for transferring is playing time, I think the waiver gets denied. However, I also believe that mitigating circumstances can be a pretty low bar when the player and the school he is leaving are working together towards the transfer. For instance, I think if a student is extremely homesick, that could be a high enough bar if all parties were supporting the transfer. JMO.

 

[volfanCLT]

 

[BruinVol]

The problem with your stance, Bruin, is that you've equated mitigating and extreme. To me extreme takes it to a whole different level. Mitigating us much broader in what could be allowed. Much more gray area with mitigating. As a matter of fact you could use "extreme mitigating" circumstances and it takes it to a different level.

I agree if a players sole reason for transferring is playing time, I think the waiver gets denied. However, I also believe that mitigating circumstances can be a pretty low bar when the player and the school he is leaving are working together towards the transfer. For instance, I think if a student is extremely homesick, that could be a high enough bar if all parties were supporting the transfer. JMO.

Good post. The difference between mitigating and extreme is irrelevant to my talk here. The only thing that matter is a player must have a reason outside of playing time for leaving. @Sleegro says that’s all he needs and that clearly is dead wrong

The discussion about about extreme and mitigating is exactly the reason why the lawyer article makes sense. The ncaa can’t decide what their own rules mean thus the reason why fancy lawyer written request is important. Either way it’s always better when the school one is leaving supported the request and respond beyond the players control.

 

[Sleegro]

You’ve earned that strut KING
View attachment 219888

Thanks. I woke up this morning like wgwdfa who's it gonna be. And toby volunteered to get wrecked.

 

[Glitch]

Good post. The difference between mitigating and extreme is irrelevant to my talk here. The only thing that matter is a player must have a reason outside of playing time for leaving. @Sleegro says that’s all he needs and that clearly is dead wrong

The discussion about about extreme and mitigating is exactly the reason why the lawyer article makes sense. The ncaa can’t decide what their own rules mean thus the reason why fancy lawyer written request is important. Either way it’s always better when the school one is leaving supported the request and respond beyond the players control.

Pruitt said in his PC the other day that Marquil Osborne wanted to transfer for more playing time. CJP wrote a letter to the NCAA on MO's behalf and he was approved for immediate eligibility.

So..... you were saying?

 

[volfanCLT]

Thanks. I woke up this morning like wgwdfa who's it gonna be. And toby volunteered to get wrecked.

 

[BruinVol]

Are you standing by yer posts that Pruitt is a liar and Harbaugh's the pillar of truth?

No I don’t because I didn’t post that

Pruitt is doing all he can to help players and isn’t going to put on a letter to the ncaa that a player is leaving for more playing time. He’s too smart for that because he knows that would blow the kids chance to play

Michigan isn’t playing nice and the net result is hurting the kids chances of winning the waiver. They aren’t playing the game to help their players.

 

[volfanCLT]

Pruitt said in his PC the other day that Marquil Osborne wanted to transfer for more playing time. CJP wrote a letter to the NCAA on MO's behalf and he was approved for immediate eligibility.

So..... you were saying?

 

[BruinVol]

Pruitt said in his PC the other day that Marquil Osborne wanted to transfer for more playing time. CJP wrote a letter to the NCAA on MO's behalf and he was approved for immediate eligibility.

So..... you were saying?

That’s simply


He didn’t write to the ncaa that he transferred for more playing time.

He wrote he was a model teammate and student and supported his waiver request. No mention of playing time in that letter I’d bet my ass

 

[Sleegro]

That’s simply


He didn’t write to the ncaa that he transferred for more playing time.

He wrote he was a model teammate and student and supported his waiver request. No mention of playing time in that letter I’d bet my ass

But you don't know because you haven't seen the letter.

 

[Glitch]

That’s simply


He didn’t write to the ncaa that he transferred for more playing time.

He wrote he was a model teammate and student and supported his waiver request. No mention of playing time in that letter I’d bet my ass

But that was the sole reason for the transfer. He wasn't homesick or needed to be close to home for a sick family member. He just wanted to see the field and it was approved.

Stay down.

 

[InVOLuntary]

Good post. The difference between mitigating and extreme is irrelevant to my talk here. The only thing that matter is a player must have a reason outside of playing time for leaving. @Sleegro says that’s all he needs and that clearly is dead wrong

The discussion about about extreme and mitigating is exactly the reason why the lawyer article makes sense. The ncaa can’t decide what their own rules mean thus the reason why fancy lawyer written request is important. Either way it’s always better when the school one is leaving supported the request and respond beyond the players control.

I could be wrong but I've not seen @Sleegro claim that a waiver solely based on playing time would be granted. I think his point has been if the real reason was playing time then enough mitigating circumstances could be found to grant immediate eligibility if the school was assisting the player transferring.

I think the overall point was if Hairball had supported Solomon and helped him get eligibility as Pruitt did with Osborne, he would have been declared eligible by now.

 

[BruinVol]

But you don't know because you haven't seen the letter.

I know the outcome which says it all

Got a question for you that is going to be very damning for you and your stance

If playing time is a reason to transfer and get a waiver why is GaTech and the family so mad at Mich for saying the kid left for more playing??!!

I mean mich is getting roasted for telling the ncaa that.

Want to explain why that’s bad??

 

[tn88volfan]

That’s simply


He didn’t write to the ncaa that he transferred for more playing time.

He wrote he was a model teammate and student and supported his waiver request. No mention of playing time in that letter I’d bet my ass

 

[volatil]

I like taking stances based on hypotheticals. That’s my favorite.

 

[BruinVol]

But that was the sole reason for the transfer. He wasn't homesick or needed to be close to home for a sick family member. He just wanted to see the field and it was approved.

Stay down.

The problem is @Sleegro who keeps liking
Your post is saying that playing time can be the sole reason for getting a waiver. Poor guy doesn’t even know that posters defending him really aren’t

 

[LA Vol]

Everybody's pretty much saying the same thing-- when both schools support the player, the waiver request is approved. Compliance and legal prepare the package, including the documentation and verbiage that follow NCAA guidelines. Not every reason a player is transferring has to be spelled out, but both schools need to be on the same page for quick approval. Otherwise, it becomes a complex case that takes much longer, requires additional documentation and results in much more red tape.

So everybody is basically agreeing, except the few who think UT's AD, Compliance Department, legal counsel and legal consultants all bungled the submission.

 

[Glitch]

The problem is @Sleegro who keeps liking
Your post is saying that playing time can be the sole reason for getting a waiver. Poor guy doesn’t even know that posters defending him really aren’t

I am defending him. That was MO's sole basis for transfer and waiver request. Nothing else. The only difference is that MO's former head coach isn't a giant douche and actually cares about his players.


Come to think of it.... Do you happen to coach college football in Ann Arbor, MI?

 

[Big Gucci Sosa]

STFU

 

[volatil]

STFU

Will do

 

[BruinVol]

I am defending him. That was MO's sole basis for transfer and waiver request. Nothing else. The only difference is that MO's former head coach isn't a giant douche and actually cares about his players.


Come to think of it.... Do you happen to coach college football in Ann Arbor, MI?

So you believe the waiver MO sent to the ncaa stated the only reason he was transferring was for more playing time and that was successful?

 

[Glitch]

STFU

Yes sir. Sorry sir.

 

[Glitch]

So you believe the waiver MO sent to the ncaa stated the only reason he was transferring was for more playing time and that was successful?

Show me that it didn't.

 

[volfanCLT]

STFU