Game Thread: Lady Vols @ Auburn: Thurs Jan 4, 7:02 p.m. CT (8:02 Eastern) ; SECN+ Win 75-67

#676
#676
Majors said:
It’s neither. You’re comparing a coach who hasn’t won to coaches who write books on winning and philosophy of winning. They’re not the same. But nice try believing somehow Kellie pulled up next to Pat and Phil Jackson. A coach doesn’t get to ride coattails because they are called coach.
Not sure you understand the question, so I’ll say it again.

Who do you trust more RJ playing or Kellie coaching? Which was the question. Somehow the answer was neither Kellie or RJ. But Pat and Phil Jackson were added with a question, which is called “deflection” and “dodging”.

Sidebar as I could be wrong…but Phil or Pat were never fired. Don’t discredit HS school zones, sometime the class(es) align for a coach who’s never won to win.
Click to expand...
On the topic of understanding, you said that the win had nothing do to with Kellie. It was just RJ taking over the game and Kellie getting out of the way. That claim also assumes that Kellie's deployment of Key, Wynn, Powell, and shifting defensive schemes did not happen. It was just RJ taking over. Fine, let's go with that.

The winning coaches I named (and you could add any other coach to the list) all had great players who could and did take over games. No one ever said that Jackson was irrelevant to the Bulls or lakers dynasties. That is a bogus logic that you invented on the spot to further agenda that kellie is incapable of things making half time adjustments, exploiting mismatches or improving players (like Wynn or Powell or her patient treatment of Key). The point was not to compare her achievements to the greats but just to show that your critique of Kellie would also served to discredit those legends, that is a means to reveal a logical fallacy.

To your weirdly insistent about trust, RJ trusts Kellie and that is what is matters, You might ask why that would be the case
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benionsopinion, glv98 and Lucy
#677
#677
madtownvol said:
On the topic of understanding, you said that the win had nothing do to with Kellie. It was just RJ taking over the game and Kellie getting out of the way. That claim also assumes that Kellie's deployment of Key, Wynn, Powell, and shifting defensive schemes did not happen. It was just RJ taking over. Fine, let's go with that.

The winning coaches I named (and you could add any other coach to the list) all had great players who could and did take over games. No one ever said that Jackson was irrelevant to the Bulls or lakers dynasties. That is a bogus logic that you invented on the spot to further agenda that kellie is incapable of things making half time adjustments, exploiting mismatches or improving players (like Wynn or Powell or her patient treatment of Key). The point was not to compare her achievements to the greats but just to show that your critique of Kellie would also served to discredit those legends, that is a means to reveal a logical fallacy.

To your weirdly insistent about trust, RJ trusts Kellie and that is what is matters, You might ask why that would be the case
Click to expand...
Yep. I trust RJ playing more than Kellies X’s and O’s. Now pick which do you trust? Pretty simple question without paragraphs of fluff.

Based on playing without RJ we know the answer. It’s documented by many here in her absence. Haven’t seen one poster state as long as Kellie is coaching we are good without RJ.
 
#678
#678
Majors said:
Yep. I trust RJ playing more than Kellies X’s and O’s. Now pick which do you trust? Pretty simple question without paragraphs of fluff.

Based on playing without RJ we know the answer. It’s documented by many here in her absence. Haven’t seen one poster state as long as Kellie is coaching we are good without RJ.
Click to expand...
this-one-deserves-a-double-facepalm-photo-u2.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: VOLSanon, Danl, glv98 and 2 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top