It has nothing to do with agreeing or not. I, point blank, called you on your pre-game agreement with a 10-15 point victory and the accompanying "everyone else is stupid for not thinking this" comment. You had nothing after this, per what I expected.
Oh for God's sake. I did not make the claim that the team would win tonight by 10-15 points. Twist it however you choose, but that was not my claim, and you only make yourself look foolish by attempting to attribute it to me. I absolutely agreed -- and still agree -- with the poster's overall sentiment. I made no claims about the team's likelihood of winning or the point spread; in fact, if you peruse some of my other comments prior to tonight's game, you will find that I said it would be difficult to win without Harrison. And I was right.
And, I think we've already established that practically nothing is the coach's fault, according to you.
I've never claimed that no amount of blame should be placed on the coach, but according to you, practically everything is the coach's fault. It takes an entire team to win a game, and it takes an entire team to lose a game. Holly didn't miss free throws tonight. Holly didn't miss shots. Holly couldn't do anything about Harrison's inability to play.
It's a complete coincidence that the same coaches tend to win and have their teams well prepared, playing well, year after year. Astonishing how that happens.
If we are talking about tending to win, Holly's got a winning record. A strong winning record, and an excellent record for a third year head coach. Nearly every top team has already lost one game this season. Apparently there's a lot of poor coaching and ill-preparation going around.