To your second statement I'm not sure I get it. All education is for education's sake. If you are making a statement that there can be more to "learn" in a school environment than what is in the texts I get you. Still, and I can't imagine you'd really want to disagree with me on this, the POINT of school is in fact education for education's sake.
I would say that publicly funded education should be guided and focused towards some kind of tangible goal. Whether this goal is for a certain percentage of the graduates to be accepted into
tier one university, take a great job with a great starting salary, or be prepared to enter the blue-collar work force as a productive employee, each and every publicly funded school district should have a goal that is not so general as "we just want our kids to learn."
You can certainly teach a child anything and, technically, they are learning. Therefore, they are getting an education for education's sake.
As for the moment of silence in order to potentially cut down on hate-crimes/bullying against homosexuals...there could be something to it. You don't think there are studies out there that show probability is stronger that a person who identifies with the following two groups will end up as sexual deviants, rapists, and/or pedophiles:
1. Homosexuals
2. Outcasts
3. Children that have been sexually abused
So, maybe the acceptance of an individual who lives a homosexual lifestyle will actually cut down heinous crimes towards children?
As for me, though, I will just send my kids to be educated in the private sector.
Now, when you consider how badly our country appears to be doing in just that one main goal I think wasting one minute of school time or one tax dollar on some politically motivated special interest group (take your pick) is a bad idea.
And while you ponder this, take a moment to consider what ideas (perhaps some you would agree with) that would not stand a chance of getting such recognition.
First, that time is not being better spent right now in the school system.
Next, I would absolutely love it if my child were exposed to a different politcally motivated special interest group
on a weekly basis. Instead, most children are exposed to absolutely nothing political, in school, until they reach college. At that point, professors have an easy task of molding their brains and turning them into little disciples.
As for all of you who are saying that middle school children are
too young and
innocent to be exposed to these kind of ideas and that it is your job to teach them about sex. When exactly are you going to have that conversation? Four years after your sons first wet dream? Five years after your daughter begins to menstruate?
Puberty begins prior to middle school, folks. If your child does not understand why their bodies are changing, then, psychologically, you are not helping them out.
Children should probably be informed when they are ten or eleven about the physical changes that will occur when they are eleven, twelve, and thirteen. By twelve (sixth grade), they should probably not believe in any fairy tales about storks.
Keeping your children in the dark is not conducive to their mental, emotional, and physical development nor well-being.