Well duh. Now where exactly are the prohibitions against homosexuality found?Actually that is from the Old Testament and has nothing to do with Gentiles. Those were Old Testament laws for the Jewish people to follow so that is very silly to try and say that applies to the topic.
Jesus never said a word about homosexuality, and it is only mentioned once in the new testament, in the homophobic diatribe of Saul of Tarsus in Romans 1BTW the Old Testament and New Testament talk about homosexuality being the same as me lusting after a woman.
How is it insulting to point out what it says? Really, if it is so insulting to you then maybe you should reconsider what you call the "word of god".Obviously you don't have to believe the Bible but it truely is insulting for someone to belittle it.
I understand the bible quite well thank you very much. I just know how to read it for myself and come to my own conclusions.You clearly have read some of the Bilbe but anyone who understands it knows the things you talked about are silly assumptions to make.
Quite simply, if my actions can cause harm to another person then I consider them immoral. If not, then I consider it a matter of personal choice.And where do you base your moral stands, or do you, just like all of the other non-biblical moral relativists, not believe in absolutes? That's a real easy way to approach the world. I couldn't care less about homosexuality, but a lot of that morality stuff is to be found in all forms of religion.
noted in my previous postRom 1:26-27
Mentions a multitude of sins, including sodomy as well as insubordination. Ever been insubordinate?I Tim 1:9-10
Talks about divorce. Since Gays were forbidden to marry at the time, it has nothing to do with homosexuality.Mark 10:2-9
See Mark 10: 2-9Matt 19:3-9
Tells women that they are to be servants to their menI cor 11:2-16
Another passage telling women that they are second class citizensEph 5:21-33
You got me on that one. I missed it.I Cor 6:9-10
I Cor 6:12-20
Since I consider the bible to be nothing more than a collection of ancient writings about God as they saw him, and nothing more, I really don't care, anymore than I care how many times the bible tells me not to eat pork.
Leviticus 18:22I assumed you felt this way, but I was truly wondering how many times, because I felt you calculated wrong. And I also wanted to make sure most of the mentions were in the Old Testament.
Per some of your other statements you would consider almost nothing immoral, unless it directly harmed someone else and the decision maker had full knowledge of the potential harm. Sound about right?I wouldn't consider it the most desirable choice for a woman to persue, but I wouldn't call it immoral.
Nothing to add, simply disagree. His assertion flies in the face of the rule of law and the ability to enforce the rules. Can you imagine someday trying to teach responsibility to a child with this approach?Good...so apparently, you have nothing to add to Saint Augustine's belief that where there is no harm inflicted there can be no wrong?