Ginsburg, 85, hospitalized after fracturing 3 ribs in fall

I never once stated it was in her job description.
You're wrong. (What you believe to be true is so frequently untrue)
Try again.
🤷‍♂️ Ok parse this and play “I didn’t say description”. Literally the first post I scrolled up and saw of yours 😂 And when you do said sales job you will be out right lying.
Think big picture Weezer.
You're being intellectually dishonest.
Her number one job is to keep the court from tilting dangerously and harmfully right.
She knows it as well as everyone else.
Have the right say they will replace her with someone like minded if that is the concern.
 
It concerns me that as an adult you seem to think that one branch of government has immense control over all others. Trump is apparently an unstoppable dictator and a right leaning court would kill everyone. You ignore the myriad checks and balances in between and go straight for the impossible nightmare. You’re on the same level as people who thought Obama would give himself another term. Marinate on that.
There are too many inaccuracies in your post to adequately address.
I love the balance of powers, it's Trump trying to change that.
I know perfectly well what a right leaning court entails, and it's certainly not death to all.
Again Trump is the one who ignores the checks and balances, and is trying to shift the power.
Your evaluation of people's levels is abysmal.
I have other things on which to marinate.
 
🤷‍♂️ Ok parse this and play “I didn’t say description”. Literally the first post I scrolled up and saw of yours 😂 And when you do said sales job you will be out right lying.
It is her number one job from a moral perspective. She knows it as well as everyone else.
You may wish to look at the post I copied for you below.
Luther: "It's in the moral fiber of her bones. That sometimes trumps job description."
It seems to completely contradict your false claim provided below.
ND40:
Every single post you’ve made stating it’s her “moral duty” and in the job description to block a functioning SCOTUS seat is incorrect and dishonest in reply to defending it.

Try again.....or not, I'd rather move on.
 
Think big picture Weezer.
You're being intellectually dishonest.
Her number one job is to keep the court from tilting dangerously and harmfully right.
She knows it as well as everyone else.
Have the right say they will replace her with someone like minded if that is the concern.

Her number one job is to interpret the law and apply it to the constitution, actually that is her only job.
 
It is her number one job from a moral perspective. She knows it as well as everyone else.
You may wish to look at the post I copied for you below.
Luther: "It's in the moral fiber of her bones. That sometimes trumps job description."
It seems to completely contradict your false claim provided below.
ND40:
Every single post you’ve made stating it’s her “moral duty” and in the job description to block a functioning SCOTUS seat is incorrect and dishonest in reply to defending it.

Try again.....or not, I'd rather move on.
😂😂😂 you lied in your claim you didn’t say it was her job Luther own it!

And you backed it up by parsing just like we knew you would too!!🤣🤣🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Her number one job is to interpret the law and apply it to the constitution, actually that is her only job.
Within the constraints of her job description. But as I've stated for the third time now, the moral fiber of her bones, trumps job description. I would hope that is true for everyone. (but I understand that it is not)
 
Within the constraints of her job description. But as I've stated for the third time now, the moral fiber of her bones, trumps job description. I would hope that is true for everyone. (but I understand that it is not)
She's gonna die
 
Within the constraints of her job description. But as I've stated for the third time now, the moral fiber of her bones, trumps job description. I would hope that is true for everyone. (but I understand that it is not)

It is her immense hubris that keeps her on the job. If she had morals she would have stepped aside years ago. Not to mention that if your morals contradict your job description and you ignore your job description in favor of your morals you need to find another job otherwise you are in essence stealing from your employer.
 
It is her immense hubris that keeps her on the job. If she had morals she would have stepped aside years ago. Not to mention that if your morals contradict your job description and you ignore your job description in favor of your morals you need to find another job otherwise you are in essence stealing from your employer.

LOL - I have to know, what of RBG's morals are you asserting are in conflict with her job?
 
😂😂😂 you lied in your claim you didn’t say it was her job Luther own it!

And you backed it up by parsing just like we knew you would too!!🤣🤣🤣
I see we are locked in your favorite game. Nuh uh, uh huh.
I said it was her number one job - morally.
Which trumps her job description. Which I also clearly said. (4 times now)
Pretty clear cut. I'll let anyone foolish enough to read through this draw their own conclusion.
But it's pretty obvious that you were wrong and to weak and petty to admit it. (to no one's surprise)
So in conclusion.
Nuh uh!
 
I see we are locked in your favorite game. Nuh uh, uh huh.
I said it was her number one job - morally.
Which trumps her job description. Which I also clearly said. (4 times now)
Pretty clear cut. I'll let anyone foolish enough to read through this draw their own conclusion.
But it's pretty obvious that you were wrong and to weak and petty to admit it. (to no one's surprise)
So in conclusion.
Nuh uh!
No you seem to be going to your favorite game. Deflection. My favorite game with you is “you lied again Luth!”
 
LOL - I have to know, what of RBG's morals are you asserting are in conflict with her job?

I have no idea what her morals are, if you payed attention you would have noticed I'm arguing with Luther who claims that is her moral fiber that is keeping her on the job and ignoring her job description.
So why don't you ask him.
 
She's a liberal, they don't have morals or ethics.
She’s a pretty damn amazing and accomplished woman who I have tremendous respect for however she is also incredibly willful, headstrong, and determined which are also admirable qualities and they are completely unproductive to a fully functioning SCOTUS in this situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb and hog88
No you seem to be going to your favorite game. Deflection. My favorite game with you is “you lied again Luth!”
You claimed that in every post I said it was in her job description.
The fact is that I didn't day that in one single post but actually the opposite.
And you claim that I am the one lying.
You are bordering on pathetic at this point.
I just have to trust that most see it for what it is.
 
You claimed that in every post I said it was in her job description.
The fact is that I didn't day that in one single post but actually the opposite.
And you claim that I am the one lying.
You are bordering on pathetic at this point.
I just have to trust that most see it for what it is.
Yeah we all see you luth for brains.
 

VN Store



Back
Top