Glenn Beck gets heckled at a Hitchcock film, others say he didn't, he cries...

#26
#26
volfanjustin said:
By saying he overreacted that means you believe it happened to some degree, why not leave him alone and let him watch the movie.
Click to expand...

Because, he set himself apart from the mainstream and purposely made incendiary claims in order to bolster his wealth, at the expense of other Americans. He has no one to blame but himself.
 
#27
#27
Meh, when the right does or says something 'out of line', the left cries foul. When the left does or says something 'out of line', the right cries foul. It's all part of the moral high ground game.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#28
#28
PoochPunt3rdDown said:
Because, he set himself apart from the mainstream and purposely made incendiary claims in order to bolster his wealth, at the expense of other Americans. He has no one to blame but himself.
Click to expand...

So should they be able to beat the hell out of him and his family if they wanted to? Maybe hang him? No matter what he has done he has no power to pass legislation or make a law. He should be able to go watch a freaking movie and not be bothered. Besides he did do some great work, Van Jones and Anita Dunn for example.
 
#29
#29
MG1968 said:
why should they expect that? Whatever happened to the free exchange of ideas? Or is liberalism the only acceptable opinion allowed on most college campuses.
Click to expand...


Easy there, Tiger.

I just meant that college kids are known for being silly when it comes to their politics (on both sides). And for being loud.

College liberals can be terribly offensive.

I for the life of me, however, cannot recall any conservative speaker seriously being hurt. The closest you could come to that would be I guess Coulter having custard pies thrown at her.

I expect she made some serious bank of off that.
 
#30
#30
PoochPunt3rdDown said:
Because, he set himself apart from the mainstream and purposely made incendiary claims in order to bolster his wealth, at the expense of other Americans. He has no one to blame but himself.
Click to expand...

the same could be said for Al Gore, but I've never seen someone use violence to keep him from speaking
 
#33
#33
volfanjustin said:
So should they be able to beat the hell out of him and his family if they wanted to? Maybe hang him? No matter what he has done he has no power to pass legislation or make a law. He should be able to go watch a freaking movie and not be bothered. Besides he did do some great work, Van Jones and Anita Dunn for example.
Click to expand...

Of course they should. That's what I've been saying all along; That anyone on the opposite side of the argument from me should be beaten and hanged.
 
#35
#35
PoochPunt3rdDown said:
Because, he set himself apart from the mainstream and purposely made incendiary claims in order to bolster his wealth, at the expense of other Americans. He has no one to blame but himself.
Click to expand...

What incendiary claims has he made? I've seen his tv show and heard his radio broadcast a few times and have never heard him say anything that made me say, "Wow, that guy is extreme". The way he presents topics is goofy and stupid, but I've never known him to be overly controversial.
 
#37
#37
SamRebel35 said:
What incendiary claims has he made? I've seen his tv show and heard his radio broadcast a few times and have never heard him say anything that made me say, "Wow, that guy is extreme". The way he presents topics is goofy and stupid, but I've never known him to be overly controversial.
Click to expand...


Double what?
 
#40
#40
PoochPunt3rdDown said:
Because, he set himself apart from the mainstream and purposely made incendiary claims in order to bolster his wealth, at the expense of other Americans. He has no one to blame but himself.
Click to expand...

So it makes it okay to disturb him and his family at a movie? Jackass
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#42
#42
MG1968 said:
the same could be said for Al Gore, but I've never seen someone use violence to keep him from speaking
Click to expand...

Took the words from my mouth. "Shouting down" your political opponents is completely sophomoric and should not be condoned. The fact that half the people on this thread seem to condone it is alarming.

Milton Friedman got pied. Milton FREAKING Friedman. He's never done anything but smile and talk softly to political opponents.

YouTube - ‪John Stossel - Free Speech Expelled‬‏
 
#44
#44
I don't like Beck because he cries a lot. His points are oftentimes way over the top, but he's not incendiary. Polarizing, sure.
 
#46
#46
SamRebel35 said:
Trying to stall while you frantically search Google for Beck quotes?
Click to expand...


If you need some third party proof of Beck's nutjob statements over the last few years, there is no point in my taking even a moment out of my day to go find them. We clearly will not agree on the matter.
 
#48
#48
lawgator1 said:
If you need some third party proof of Beck's nutjob statements over the last few years, there is no point in my taking even a moment out of my day to go find them. We clearly will not agree on the matter.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but you claimed he's made incendiary comments. I think he's a nut myself, but I don't see him inciting people to riot. You think it's justifiable to "pie" and shout-down those who make incendiary comments? What if it were Al Sharpton making the incendiary comments? Would you condone college students not allowing him to speak?
 
#49
#49
nbakerld said:
Yeah, but you claimed he's made incendiary comments. I think he's a nut myself, but I don't see him inciting people to riot. You think it's justified to "pie" and shout-down those who make incendiary comments? What if it were Al Sharpton making the incendiary comments? Would you condone college students not allowing him to speak?
Click to expand...
LG would, true to form, label them as racists.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#50
#50
nbakerld said:
Yeah, but you claimed he's made incendiary comments. I think he's a nut myself, but I don't see him inciting people to riot. You think it's justifiable to "pie" and shout-down those who make incendiary comments? What if it were Al Sharpton making the incendiary comments? Would you condone college students not allowing him to speak?
Click to expand...

Sharpton actually DID make incendiary comments, which led to a riot. And yet from some reason he's still put up on a pedestal as some great civil rights leader.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top