Okay so now that the BCS era has ended, how do you view the new playoff system? Honestly, I had gotten so used to the BCS I didn't mind it all that much anymore and I felt that for the most part, it got the match ups right. Now, I'm not saying it should remain in place, it's just I'm not too familiar on how the new system will work (selection of the final teams). I'll look into it in the coming months so I'm not asking how it works, I'm just curious to hear your opinions about the new playoff system and if you feel like throwing in some explanations, that'll work too.
Think about this:
1. Before the BCS sports writers and coaches determined the National Champion. Talk about bias. How many of Notre Dame's National Championships were undeserved. Probably 2 or 3. And in 1990 Ga Tech got screwed. Colorado did not deserve that Championship. Ga. Tech was 11-0-1. They tied #11 North Carolina and BEAT Nebraska 45-24 in the Bowl Game. They beat 8 ranked teams and tied 1. Colorado was 11-1-1. They lost to Illinois tied Tennessee. They beat Nebraska 27-12 and they were given 5 downs to beat Missouri. There was liberal bias involved here. And there are others.
2. The BCS system got the correct National Champion 16 times. 16 for 16 not bad. For the most part they had the correct #1 vs. #2 Maybe two or three times you could have argued about who #2 should have been.
3. The BCS system keeps the Bowl season intact which I am for 100%. I love that there are 35 bowl games. It is fun and if you like watching college football 35 championship type games. Yes, I don't have a problem with 6-6 teams getting in. Under this system it works. I would love to watch a 6-6 Tennessee team play in a bowl.
4. This is maybe the most important factor. The BCS system made the regular season like a full season playoff!! There were critical games every week. Excitement from Labor Day until 1st week of December!! Not like the ridiculous Basketball season where the 8th place team in the BigEast or Big10 can win the National Championship -- What a joke!!! The regular season, conference champions, and some league tournament championship are nothing more than a way for the tournament committee to seed Duke#1 every year and allow teams with LOSING conference records into the tournament. There is even talk about letting everyone in so then why play the regular season?
5. One thing the BCS did that is pure stupidity is to say the computer systems can't use margin of victory. What a joke! That is the most important thing THE FINAL SCORE and who won. I can see limiting it to nothing higher than 40 points but MARGIN of VICTORY does mean something.
The playoff:
Having a committee with Condolesa Rice is going to screw up probably the 4th and maybe 3rd rank team at sometime. And how the 4 are seeded will be biased.
But if kept to 4 teams the BOWL Season would stay intact and the regular season still is critical.
Unfortunately, the me me me attitude and need it now deserve it without work mentality of our population I forsee the 4 expanded to 6 and then to 8. Once you get to 8, The bowl season is damaged and the regular season gets a major injury. Because at 8 teams and probably 6 teams the out of conference regular season becomes meaningless.
I know this is a lot but it all should be taken in and really thought out!!!
Oh GoVols.