Goodbye Oregon Football

But, if he didn't care about Oregon, there are about 3000 other threads he could busy himself with.

Unless he just wants to inform you that all the excuses and deflections are stupid (which he has clearly been doing). You're the one on an opponent's board that you don't play for two more years. Why?
 
The first round of documents sent was not current. The second round was.

I'm not sure why the thank you card would be very significant if he is thanking Lyles for something that isn't a violation.

The second round was spreadsheets that had almost nothing on them...but were somehow worth 25K.

Oregon "purchased" the 2011 National Service. Was either round of documents about 2011 recruits?
 
But, if he didn't care about Oregon, there are about 3000 other threads he could busy himself with.

Yeah, you got me. Because Oregon has bought players and blatantly violated recruiting bylaws and I have posted about it in here, means I just love Oregon. And because I believe oregon to had violated the **** out of the rules, according to your opinion, that means I am just jelli of oregon. Your pathetic deflection turning into acting like this is just a witch hunt by a jealous fan base of sore losers (UT) makes me want to comment more in this thread, not my love or "give a ****" about oregon.
 
The second round was spreadsheets that had almost nothing on them...but were somehow worth 25K.

Oregon "purchased" the 2011 National Service. Was either round of documents about 2011 recruits?

He will either ignore you, attempt to deflect it, or he will come up with some irrational defense for CCK purchasing outdated recruiting information.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
One of the nice things of being a long time fan of a historically relevant program. I don't have to go to other crappy message boards seeking validation, especially when going through a rough patch, as the others will still come to you.
 
Unless he just wants to inform you that all the excuses and deflections are stupid (which he has clearly been doing). You're the one on an opponent's board that you don't play for two more years. Why?

I'm not the one complaining. He can "inform" anyone he wants. I'm just informing him that he does care about Oregon football, obviously.

As far as why I am on this board, why not? As I've written, I like UT. I've been posting here since the Bryce Brown saga. When UT landed him I wished you guys good luck and congratulations. A lot of fans here were great about it.

It's only a few of you who are coming at me. Not the other way around. I simply posted my opinion.

The second round was spreadsheets that had almost nothing on them...but were somehow worth 25K.

The published information is to meet a paperwork requirement. They are not meant by the services or the NCAA rules to be the sum of what was paid for. It's allowed to get information verbally from scouting services. That is what was most valuable to Oregon from Lyles.

Oregon "purchased" the 2011 National Service. Was either round of documents about 2011 recruits?

Yes. The second round of documents.

Yeah, you got me. Because Oregon has bought players and blatantly violated recruiting bylaws and I have posted about it in here, means I just love Oregon. And because I believe oregon to had violated the **** out of the rules, according to your opinion, that means I am just jelli of oregon. Your pathetic deflection turning into acting like this is just a witch hunt by a jealous fan base of sore losers (UT) makes me want to comment more in this thread, not my love or "give a ****" about oregon.

I didn't claim that you love Oregon. But, you obviously care about them.

How you come away with the idea that I'm saying all of UT are sore losers is beyond me. Re-read what I've written in the last 24 hours and check back in.

One of the nice things of being a long time fan of a historically relevant program. I don't have to go to other crappy message boards seeking validation, especially when going through a rough patch, as the others will still come to you.

I just like CFB. It's interesting to get to know other programs, see what their perspectives are, etc.

For what it's worth, we have posters from other programs on Oregon boards too. Their input is welcome unless it's just to insult.
 
I guess I should have clarified which variety of sour grapes I was referring to. Not the jealous kind. The sore loser ones.

:)

Oregon was a better team than us last year, plain and simple. Any UT fan that won't admit that is as bad as a fan of UO that refuses to acknowledge that some serious NCAA shiz is about to come down on them. Wait a minute; I may know of someone that fits the latter description.....
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Audio: Willie Lyles confirms Chip Kelly's direct involvement in possible Oregon coverup bit.ly/q1PBW1
TweetDeck • 7/10/11 8:33 PM
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
I'm starting to like Wheaton, he reminds of Tommy Flanagan.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mx3wrfhQaqk[/youtube]
 
What is your coach? The one who taught his players to fake injuries.

Bias unveiled.

Yes faking injuries and paying for players are really in the same ballpark. An in case you forget he was the coach who was responsible for your only non cheating success.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Yes faking injuries and paying for players are really in the same ballpark. An in case you forget he was the coach who was responsible for your only non cheating success.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Asinine statement is asinine.
 
Oregon "purchased" the 2011 National Service. Was either round of documents about 2011 recruits?

Yes. The second round of documents.

Oregon football: More details, questions come with Willie Lyles? recruiting files | UO releases more recruiting documents, but they raise more questions about what it received for $25,000

Willie Lyles provided the University of Oregon football program with more recruiting information than the school released Monday, though the additional documents provided to the media on Tuesday evening raised more questions.

The newest information from Lyles that Oregon put out came in the form of spreadsheets that listed high school sophomores in North and South Carolina, juniors in Louisiana and “east Texas” and sophomores in the east Texas area. Thus, none of the latest recruits listed could be considered as potential members of the 2011 recruiting class, the purported basis of a “2011 National Package” of recruits that Oregon paid $25,000 for with a check dated March 30, 2010, to Lyles. The lists of underclassmen also were delivered to the UO almost a year after that payment to Lyles.

Wanna rethink?
 
No I did not read this article. No I will never read your articles again and yes I wish you would answer the question. How much did you pay Willie Lyles for that interview? Sooner or later you have to answer, the public wants the truth!!

Canzano: Oregon needs to let Chip Kelly talk before Pac-12 media day | OregonLive.com


EW, nice post. This is going to be a non-story---one that will teach Oregon a lesson about going into Texas to grab a player, ANY player---and soon we can thankfully concentrate on Dallas and get ready to root for our team against LSU! I remember reading the other day a Goe story and he talked about some teams that 'self reported' or did something..to appease the NCAA..I don't even remember any of the teams or what happened...lets remember that with the 'internet news cycle' that any amount of 'news' is splashed across cyberspace...masquerading as truth and wisdom and actual news..

Wheatons are everywhere
 

VN Store



Back
Top