GOP wants to force this girl to have the baby

#2
#2
has any republican walked up to a microphone and stated, unequivocally, that he/she will seek to force that 11 year old to bear the child?

I didn't see any such language in the platform. There is talk of a Constitutional amendment, but that is nearly impossible to accomplish. There is talk of a ban on partial-birth abortions. I can't find anything that states that victims of rape/incest must have the child.
 
#3
#3
MG1968 said:
has any republican walked up to a microphone and stated, unequivocally, that he/she will seek to force that 11 year old to bear the child?

I didn't see any such language in the platform. There is talk of a Constitutional amendment, but that is nearly impossible to accomplish. There is talk of a ban on partial-birth abortions. I can't find anything that states that victims of rape/incest must have the child.
Click to expand...
Clearly this wasnt a legitimate rape - duh


Come on guys, she would have shut that thing down if it were...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#4
#4
MG1968 said:
has any republican walked up to a microphone and stated, unequivocally, that he/she will seek to force that 11 year old to bear the child?

I didn't see any such language in the platform. There is talk of a Constitutional amendment, but that is nearly impossible to accomplish. There is talk of a ban on partial-birth abortions. I can't find anything that states that victims of rape/incest must have the child.
Click to expand...

Obviously, you haven't read the GOP platform, which states that its goal is to protect all fetuses...does not make any exceptions for rape.

Santorum has said that women who are raped and impregnated should just "accept the gift from God." So has Sarah Palin, so have several other GOP congress members/candidates.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#5
#5
KoachKrab127 said:
Obviously, you haven't read the GOP platform, which states that its goal is to protect all fetuses...does not make any exceptions for rape.
Click to expand...

again, show me the Republican in the congressional district this girl lives in that has gone on record as wanting to force this girl to have the baby
 
#6
#6
MG1968 said:
again, show me the Republican in the congressional district this girl lives in that has gone on record as wanting to force this girl to have the baby
Click to expand...

I never said a GOP candidate talked about this specific case. Do you really have a problem making inferences?

The GOP platform says that abortion is unacceptable under any circumstances. Any 2nd grader can infer that this means they want to force rape victims to have the rapist's child.
 
#7
#7
MG1968 said:
again, show me the Republican in the congressional district this girl lives in that has gone on record as wanting to force this girl to have the baby
Click to expand...

Whether he personally believes it is immaterial if the party gets its way.
 
#8
#8
dukes_of_maggard said:
Clearly this wasnt a legitimate rape - duh


Come on guys, she would have shut that thing down if it were...
Click to expand...

Yup, the 11 year old must have wanted it...or maybe she was dressed too provocatively. She had it coming. She needs to accept the consequences of the choices she made (according to the GOP).
 
#9
#9
KoachKrab127 said:
Yup, the 11 year old must have wanted it...or maybe she was dressed too provocatively. She had it coming. She needs to accept the consequences of the choices she made (according to the GOP).
Click to expand...

Or her body would have rejected the conception. Its science, afterall.
 
#10
#10
KoachKrab127 said:
I never said a GOP candidate talked about this specific case. Do you really have a problem making inferences?

The GOP platform says that abortion is unacceptable under any circumstances. Any 2nd grader can infer that this means they want to force rape victims to have the rapist's child.
Click to expand...

abortion is legal and the GOP can't do what Obama did and just ignore a law that they don't agree with

the platform may state that abortion is unacceptable, but the words mean little, if anything, without legal support
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14
#14
MG1968 said:
abortion is legal and the GOP can't do what Obama did and just ignore a law that they don't agree with

the platform may state that abortion is unacceptable, but the words mean little, if anything, without legal support
Click to expand...

Exactly.

That is in the platform to appease the social conservatives.
 
#15
#15
Gramps said:
Exactly.

That is in the platform to appease the social conservatives.
Click to expand...

Then social conservatives want to force this girl to have the baby.

No? I don't know anymore.

Why have it in the effing platform if you don't really mean it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#16
#16
rjd970 said:
Then social conservatives want to force this girl to have the baby.

No? I don't know anymore.

Why have it in the effing platform if you don't really mean it?
Click to expand...

It is in the platform to get votes.... period.

I would think some right wing religious groups would force her to have the baby.

There was something out a few weeks ago that when Romney was a bishop in the Mormon church he went to a single woman who was pregnant and tried to force her to put the child up for adoption. She wasn't considering abortion, the church felt like she was too immoral to raise a child.
 
#18
#18
tim said:
The dems want to kill all unborn babies.


See making shiz up is fun and easy.
Click to expand...

Dems don't believe in God and think Jerusalem and Israel shouldn't exist.......oh wait, they put them BACK in their platform (after Barry removed them because Jerusalem was still a "bargaining chip" for him) by a one third aye to two thirds ney minority. I guess the teleprompter counts as a two thirds majority vote.
 
#19
#19
tim said:
The dems want to kill all unborn babies.


See making shiz up is fun and easy.
Click to expand...

That's the most ridiculous argument ever.

Being pro-choice means the woman should have a choice whether or not to have a baby.

Being anti-choice means that women should be forced to have babies.

There is a huge difference between giving a woman a choice and forcing her to have an abortion. One requires choice, one is the government forcing you to do something.

If you are "pro-life" you want to force women to have babies. The GOP platform says they want to protect all fetuses regardless of the circumstances. Therefore, they would require that raped women and even raped girls have babies.

How can you possibly argue with this logic? Maybe YOU PERSONALLY don't believe raped women should be forced to have babies (which, in my opinion, is a good thing to believe), however, the way the GOP platform is worded, it is what they want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#20
#20
KoachKrab127 said:
That's the most ridiculous argument ever.

Being pro-choice means the woman should have a choice whether or not to have a baby.

Being anti-choice means that women should be forced to have babies.

There is a huge difference between giving a woman a choice and forcing her to have an abortion. One requires choice, one is the government forcing you to do something.

If you are "pro-life" you want to force women to have babies. The GOP platform says they want to protect all fetuses regardless of the circumstances. Therefore, they would require that raped women and even raped girls have babies.

How can you possibly argue with this logic? Maybe YOU PERSONALLY don't believe raped women should be forced to have babies (which, in my opinion, is a good thing to believe), however, the way the GOP platform is worded, it is what they want.
Click to expand...

Platforms are tools to real in the votes of the weakminded, which apparently includes you if you believe that there is any danger whatsoever of either party's entire platform being implemented as law.
 
#22
#22
knucklehead_vol said:
Kinda weird you start a thread like this and have a baby as your avatar.

Maybe it's just me.
Click to expand...

Such an ignorant comment. That baby is my daughter. My wife and I chose to have her because we knew we could raise her. We wanted a baby.

If you are pro-choice, it means you support a woman's right to choose to have a baby. It doesn't mean you want every woman to have an abortion. That type of simplistic, ignorant, propaganda is exactly what causes people to bomb abortion clinics, kill doctors, and harass places like Planned Parenthood.

It is stupid to think that pro-choice people want women to have abortions. I can't even describe how stupid and disgusting that kind of thought process is.
 
#23
#23
volinbham said:
This is not the party goal.
Click to expand...

Then why doesn't the GOP platform say, "We want to stop all abortion, except in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the life of the mother."

They don't do that. There is NO exception of rape or other circumstances in the platform. Please, explain it to me.
 
#24
#24
Also, show me exactly where in the Bible it says that life begins at conception. This is the huge argument conservatives always throw out there, yet it just is not in the Bible. Actually, there are quite a few bible verses where God "rips the wombs of pregnant women open."
 
#25
#25
KoachKrab127 said:
Then why doesn't the GOP platform say, "We want to stop all abortion, except in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the life of the mother."

They don't do that. There is NO exception of rape or other circumstances in the platform. Please, explain it to me.
Click to expand...

Gramps already did - I'm sure there's all kinds of stupid crap in the Dem platform too. Bottomline is that the GOP as a whole doesn't want to force this girl to have the baby - you jumped to that conclusion.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top