Disagree.Agreed, but term limits would not deny that opportunity, it would only narrow the field to choose from. There are already certain restrictions on who can run for office, term limits would just add one more and it is desperately needed.
Disagree.
If someone has “termed out”, they are no longer eligible to be chosen by the People. You’ve limited their choice.
Who would choose either. But convicted felons can run for office.I can see that sentiment, but choice is already limited. A 12 year old boy can’t be Governor, should he be allowed to be just because his ineligibility narrows the choices? Should a child rapist in prison be eligible because his exclusion limits the people’s choices? Restrictions are already there for “the people” and term limits is a worthy restriction. Just my opinion.