BigOrangeCrush32
Why, You're no Daisy at all...
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2009
- Messages
- 3,112
- Likes
- 2,082
well it may have been the laugh followed by the Son of a B&*^%![]()
Coug finally got something right, she'll never shut up now. Lol
That's hysterical. I can picture it in my head now.
Says the guy who thought Glen was definitely on the bus and most certainly not in the prison.
You didn't answer my question above.
so no one wants to try and understand Friday's episode?
I can't explain why the baby seems to be attached to Nick's mom or why the baby likes the locket with her and Nick's photo in it.
As far as for giving up the baby to the royals, I think the general assumption was that the baby can take care of itself. If a creepy, superhuman baby caused a skull to show up on my car window I'd probably pull over and get out.
There are some issues in that episode that I think they're probably going to address at a later date.
You did see the very end right? They kidnapped the baby back from the royals and Nick's mom was off in the Pacific NW countryside with the baby. Presumably, this is so Adalind is unaware. At least that's what I got out of it. There is definitely a connection between Nick's mom and the baby though.
I really hope next week is a self-contained filler episode. I really hope they don't introduce this new person as a "female" Nick, like they've messed up Person of Interest having female Reese.
I really hope next week is a self-contained filler episode. I really hope they don't introduce this new person as a "female" Nick, like they've messed up Person of Interest having female Reese.