VolsCigarMan
Official Vol Cigar Man
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2009
- Messages
- 2,087
- Likes
- 2,121
I agree to an extent. With the exception of Hopson the last few games, Pearl and Company haven't consistently taken high ranked players and made them better. However, going to school or staying in school would have definitely been better for some people. Most 18 or 19 yr olds are not ready for the life of the NBA. Look at the percentage of busts from jumping straight to NBA or now leaving after 1 year.
I love it when people put forward the idea that a guy will improve more going to class, being coached by the Tony Jones of the world, and practicing and playing against college kids than focusing on basketball 24-7, working with the best player development guys in the world, and competing against NBA guys every day. It's ridiculous.
I've heard that argument a lot in Buckeye country about guys like Oden, Conley, and now Sullinger. Seems to be code for: 'I hope this guy passes up on the next level to carry my favorite team for another year.'I love it when people put forward the idea that a guy will improve more going to class, being coached by the Tony Jones of the world, and practicing and playing against college kids than focusing on basketball 24-7, working with the best player development guys in the world, and competing against NBA guys every day. It's ridiculous.
admit it, it does make a little sense. C'mon..
No, it doesn't. It is faulty reasoning. If you had a multi-million dollar job offer, would you delay it because your work skills might be able to be improved in a year's time, when you might be able to take the same job after a year of training for free?
A player doesn't have to power up before attacking the next level.