hatvol96
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Messages
- 49,979
- Likes
- 18
The same ones. I've been telling people since Pearl got here that he's a phony who's no more concerned about complying with 'AA rules than the next guy. The sheep and the apologists just chose not to believe the truth.What was your problem with him before all of the NCAA investigations came out?
He's a pious phony. I don't mind if a guy is playing on the edges of the rules. However, if you do, don't try to pass yourself as The Last Honest Man In College Basketball.
I'd say they got an extremely favorable draw. You do realize Stan Heath made an Elite 8, don't you? How great is he?
I didn't say Pearl has only had one good season here. My point is that he's not at that elite level as a coach.I see your point, but it's not like Pearl is a one hit wonder. He has taken us to the tournament every year, a first round win in 2006, two sweet sixteens, and an elite 8 (I'll not mention the 2009 Okie St. heart breaker).
That's pretty consistent. Plus the SEC was much tougher his first two to three years.
I didn't say Pearl has only had one good season here. My point is that he's not at that elite level as a coach.
Did I say he's not a good coach? There are 340 or so teams in D-I. Not being in the top 20 doesn't mean you are competent.I know but that resume is pretty decent. What would he need to do to be considered a top 20 coach, in your mind?
I understand if you don't like the guy based on purely personal reasons. But to say he's not a good coach I can't agree with.
Did I say he's not a good coach? There are 340 or so teams in D-I. Not being in the top 20 doesn't mean you are competent.
Before I consider Pearl an elite coach I'll have to see sustained competence in the halfcourt defensively and something that at least remotely resembles a halfcourt offensive plan.