tennrich1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2008
- Messages
- 6,302
- Likes
- 7,980
Others have added to their stats, their wins and everything in between.
Hooker went down. His team was losing badly and lost badly. He has no chance to add anything to his resume, while others did and some will continue next week and even into the bowl.
While voting will end, those players will still be guiding their teams.
Hooker might get an invite however he won’t win. If he were miles ahead when he went down and Tennessee has beaten SC maybe…….but that wasn’t the case. In fact at the time he was 2nd in the odds.
Not going to go from 2nd in the odds to winning with no chance of playing further.
Two reasons OP. 1.He's a Vol 2.There is no award for potential
That said, the sooner you learn that it is a corrupt media popularity award, the better. The only reason I wanted HH to win was for the $$$ that would come his way. There is almost nothing objective about it . Nearly pure hype.
Someone needs to explain to me why a guy who was among the 2-3 favorites all season, put up ridiculous numbers, was instrumental in resurrecting a football program, and missed only one game is now eliminated from consideration because he suffered an injury. If Hendon Hooker doesn't at the very least get an invite to NYC the whole thing is a complete joke.
Who gets to go to New York? Caleb Williams, okay, he's your winner at this point. But who beyond that? The kid from North Carolina? The TCU QB? I mean, seriously, is there anyone that would have touched Hooker had he not gotten hurt? And yet I keep reading that he 'lost his Heisman chance' with the injury. Ridiculous.
That's a fair point as well, heck, Florida beat Utah. I sincerely don't think the voters look at body of work, as much as it's a popularity contest. A few weeks ago all the commentators were talking Stroud and Hooker, that was the two guys everyone said were going to win. Now that USC is in the playoff mix, and an old media darling, their QB suddenly is the favorite.
I agree wholeheartedly but if you didn't know they Heisman was a complete joke after Manning was snubbed for Woodson then I don't know what to tell you.
They invite the top vote getters. Where they cut off they invite list varies each year. So if Hooker is in the top 3 or 4 in votes he will get invited.I'll say this once more - I hold no illusions about the Heisman or any other award where the media is involved in picking winners. Peyton is one of an endless number of travesties over the years in picking Heisman winners, Hall of Fame inductees, and on and on.
I just want Hooker to get the honor of an invite to NYC for the ceremony. He earned that at the very least.
I’d be really surprised if he got an invite. It’d be great and he deserves it but everyone outside of UT fans have basically forgotten him already. Stroud and Williams take two spots. The other two likely to be Duggan and Stetson Bennett . And I’d expect them to rush Bryce Young into the race before inviting an injured Hendon coming off USC and not far removed from UGA.
So to use your own stupid logic, Shroud is automatically out as well correct? Caleb Williams is out too, right? Only players from undefeated teams are allowed to win the trophy, correct?
I wasn't making any statement with orange tinted glasses. I agree that Hooker isn't going to win, probably never was. I'm confused how some of you can't understand the question, has nothing to do with cherry picking anything. Someone made a claim that because Hooker had two losses, there was zero chance he wins. All I asked, which was confusing, is what just Hooker, because several winners have had 2 losses, I know one winner had 3. Maybe I'm asking wrong, but I didn't understand someone saying you can't win with two losses, when it's literally happened. Not cherry picking, not wearing tinted anything, but if you make that statement, you should back up how others have won what you're claiming is impossible. That's what I was asking.I’d say because every Heisman race is unique. Don’t think trying to compare RG3 or Johnny Manziel to Hooker is quite apples to apples, though everyone loves to cherry-pick anomalies to bolster arguments. Take off the orange glasses and it’s fair to say Hooker was 80% done after the Georgia game. Had he beaten USC and not gotten hurt, all things stay the same with Stroud and OSU, and Caleb Williams not beat UCLA the way he did he likely pulls it off.
It would be nice to see Hooker, Corum and a couple of others get invitations as say an "honorable mention" recognition.
That said, I could not care less about the "Hypesman" trophy... Healthy or not Hooker never had a chance to win because of the way it's voted on. If Div I coaches voted for the winner, I might have a bit more respect for it.
Keeping it real is what people say when they are being a d!ck.
Citing Hooker’s #s is not hubris, it’s a reasonable argument, but the Heisman has been a high school popularity contest for a while.
Someone needs to explain to me why a guy who was among the 2-3 favorites all season, put up ridiculous numbers, was instrumental in resurrecting a football program, and missed only one game is now eliminated from consideration because he suffered an injury. If Hendon Hooker doesn't at the very least get an invite to NYC the whole thing is a complete joke.
Who gets to go to New York? Caleb Williams, okay, he's your winner at this point. But who beyond that? The kid from North Carolina? The TCU QB? I mean, seriously, is there anyone that would have touched Hooker had he not gotten hurt? And yet I keep reading that he 'lost his Heisman chance' with the injury. Ridiculous.
You must really hate coaches then because the media, as a whole, SUCKS BALLS!Not necessarily, because coaches have their own axes to grind, and the weekly coaches poll routinely shows that. They don't see nearly enough of games out of their own conferences to be fair judges anyway.
That said, my contempt level for coaches is far less than it is for the media.
I don't think anyone is arguing that Hooker should win the damn thing, at least that wasn't the intention of my OP. I get the fact that he couldn't win it after SC, but to not simply get an invite after the season he had, essentially being the face of CFB for much of the season, would be a disgrace.