Here we go again...

#76
#76
...any dumb reason anyone can bring up for voting Obama, one can come up with an equally dumb reason somebody voted for Bush.

Voted for Obama because he is black, voted for Bush because he believes in Jesus. Neither would have won the election without those electorates and both groups have equally stupid reasons.

Enviormentalists voted for Obama, big energy voted for Bush.

Pro-Choice voted Obama, Pro-Life voted Bush.

...and so on...and so on....
There were two reasons I voted for Bush.

2000 - Al Gore
2004 - John Kerry
 
#78
#78
Algore...... hmmm......... I wonder about how he would have handled 9/11. The GOP would still have congress....

I would actually prefer Kerry over Obama......
 
#82
#82
...any dumb reason anyone can bring up for voting Obama, one can come up with an equally dumb reason somebody voted for Bush.

Voted for Obama because he is black, voted for Bush because he believes in Jesus. Neither would have won the election without those electorates and both groups have equally stupid reasons.

Enviormentalists voted for Obama, big energy voted for Bush.

Pro-Choice voted Obama, Pro-Life voted Bush.

...and so on...and so on....

I must have missed something, I didn't know Bush was running against Obama.
 
#83
#83
...any dumb reason anyone can bring up for voting Obama, one can come up with an equally dumb reason somebody voted for Bush.

Voted for Obama because he is black, voted for Bush because he believes in Jesus. Neither would have won the election without those electorates and both groups have equally stupid reasons.

Enviormentalists voted for Obama, big energy voted for Bush.

Pro-Choice voted Obama, Pro-Life voted Bush.

...and so on...and so on....

Voting for race is the only stupid reason I see here. The rest are valid points of contention between candidates.
 
#86
#86
Moral convictions drive a lot of the religious vote. Same can't be said for voting based on race.


Voting primarily on morals is silly as well. Wouldn't this country be better served if people voted based on economic, foreign, and social policy (in that order)? I mean, really, why does it matter if a candidate believes in evolution, or is pro-life? Doesn't his views on economic policy matter to each of us just a little more?

Ethnic identification drives a lot of the racial vote, same can't be said for the religious vote. Does that mean it is legitimate?
 
#87
#87
Voting primarily on morals is silly as well. Wouldn't this country be better served if people voted based on economic, foreign, and social policy (in that order)? I mean, really, why does it matter if a candidate believes in evolution, or is pro-life? Doesn't his views on economic policy matter to each of us just a little more?

Ethnic identification drives a lot of the racial vote, same can't be said for the religious vote. Does that mean it is legitimate?

Morals don't play with those.....?????

:blink:
 
#88
#88
Voting primarily on morals is silly as well. Wouldn't this country be better served if people voted based on economic, foreign, and social policy (in that order)? I mean, really, why does it matter if a candidate believes in evolution, or is pro-life? Doesn't his views on economic policy matter to each of us just a little more?

Ethnic identification drives a lot of the racial vote, same can't be said for the religious vote. Does that mean it is legitimate?

I couldn't agree more. Someone's stance on abortion doesn't give them the clairvoiance to handle an increasingly hostile situation in Iran, N Korea, China, etc as well as a crumbling economy.


Unless you're Pelosi, then I suppose it does.
 
#89
#89
I couldn't agree more. Someone's stance on abortion doesn't give them the clairvoiance to handle an increasingly hostile situation in Iran, N Korea, China, etc as well as a crumbling economy.


Unless you're Pelosi, then I suppose it does.

Substitute a number of words.......

:eek:k:
 
#93
#93
You really don't see religion as a stupid reason to base one's vote on?

Absolutely not. I want the POTUS to have at least a similar world view to my own. A Muslim does not have a similar world view to my own. It would be very hard for me to vote for a Muslim.
 
#94
#94
Voting primarily on morals is silly as well. Wouldn't this country be better served if people voted based on economic, foreign, and social policy (in that order)? I mean, really, why does it matter if a candidate believes in evolution, or is pro-life? Doesn't his views on economic policy matter to each of us just a little more?

Ethnic identification drives a lot of the racial vote, same can't be said for the religious vote. Does that mean it is legitimate?

What do morals have to do with evolution?

Morals play into economic policy.
 
#96
#96
Voting primarily on morals is silly as well. Wouldn't this country be better served if people voted based on economic, foreign, and social policy (in that order)? I mean, really, why does it matter if a candidate believes in evolution, or is pro-life? Doesn't his views on economic policy matter to each of us just a little more?

Ethnic identification drives a lot of the racial vote, same can't be said for the religious vote. Does that mean it is legitimate?

If people would vote their belief system instead of selling out to the "pocketbook" many of the concerns that most people have would take care of themselves. How do you expect a person of no moral character to look out for your best interest?
 
#97
#97
If people would vote their belief system instead of selling out to the "pocketbook" many of the concerns that most people have would take care of themselves. How do you expect a person of no moral character to look out for your best interest?

Simple, those people use the scientific theorem....
 

VN Store



Back
Top