Herschel Walker channeling his inner Travis Henry

#376
#376
tnmarktx said:
So, you're admitting that you are for unlawful elections as long as your preferred candidate gets in? Also, you tout your intelligence on here constantly. It's unlawful because it leads to fraudulent ballot harvesting which is illegal.
Click to expand...
All I've asked for is what made it illegal in 2020. What statute, law, regulation, etc was broken? To be unlawful it had to break an actual law right?

I can't remember ever touting my intelligence. You must have gathered that from my brilliant posts
 
#377
#377
utvolpj said:
All I've asked for is what made it illegal in 2020. What statute, law, regulation, etc was broken? To be unlawful it had to break an actual law right?
Click to expand...
The election in Wisconsin did break their election laws. Drop boxes and ballot harvesting is illegal in Wisconsin, the court confirmed this.
 
#378
#378
tnmarktx said:
The election in Wisconsin did break their election laws. Drop boxes and ballot harvesting is illegal in Wisconsin, the court confirmed this.
Click to expand...
What law prevents drop boxes? How were they allowed to bypass those laws and get boxes set up?
 
#383
#383
utvolpj said:
Mass mail in voting had an effect and got a terrible candidate elected. If that wasn't fraud it's as close as you can get and really pushed the rules. It should have never been used and wouldn't have of the Dems weren't scared of losing again
Click to expand...
I disagree. There is nothing to support the belief that mass mail-in voting leads to an increase in voter fraud. A terrible candidate was going to be elected in 2020, because there was nothing but terrible candidates on the ballot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol
#384
#384
BowlBrother85 said:
I disagree. There is nothing to support the belief that mass mail-in voting leads to an increase in voter fraud. A terrible candidate was going to be elected in 2020, because there was nothing but terrible candidates on the ballot.
Click to expand...
Sure there is if you're honest. No one believes any nursing home actually had 100% participation.

It also allows people to vote who otherwise would have no interest and have zero knowledge of what's going on. That's not a positive to getting real leadership in place. It was done because Dems believed it would win then the election. Trump was stupid and didn't push it when it became obvious those ballots would happen
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#385
#385
utvolpj said:
Which is their interpretation based on a subjective review. I'm asking for the "plain English" statute that was broken. It doesn't appear there is one
Click to expand...
Their subjective ruling holds more weight than your subjective opinion.
 
#386
#386
BowlBrother85 said:
That is stupid. There is no proof that cheating or fraud led to Biden's victory. The Republicans ran a bad candidate and paid the price for it. It wasn't even a close election. Even if you concede both Georgia and Wisconsin to Trump... Biden still wins.
Click to expand...

That's because they asked cops to bring a case to court in a matter of days after the crime happened. No prosecutor on earth could do that. Investigations take time. Yes, we had the dead body (now inhabiting the WH) but nobody knew how it got there so they could all maintain the fiction that it wasn't murder.

Second of all, had they actually wanted to know what probably happened, they should not have asked cops but crooks, AKA political operatives who could have outlined the real pathways to start investigating instead of looking at things suis generis. "If you had to steal this election, how would you do it?" Again, don't ask security guards or a tictok pundit, ask a bank robber.
 
#387
#387
utvolpj said:
Sure there is if you're honest. No one believes any nursing home actually had 100% participation.
Click to expand...
That is leaning on supposition, rather than actual proof. It's the same fallacy as pointing to election anomalies as if they are proof of fraud.

Example : No Presidential candidate has ever won Florida, North Carolina, Ohio and Iowa and lost the election. So that proves that there must have been fraud.

No, it doesn't.

utvolpj said:
It also allows people to vote who otherwise would have no interest and have zero knowledge of what's going on. That's not a positive to getting real leadership in place.
Click to expand...
Maybe ... but that isn't fraud.
 
#388
#388
BowlBrother85 said:
That is leaning on supposition, rather than actual proof. It's the same fallacy as pointing to election anomalies as if they are proof of fraud.

Example : No Presidential candidate has ever won Florida, North Carolina, Ohio and Iowa and lost the election. So that proves that there must have been fraud.

No, it doesn't.


Maybe ... but that isn't fraud.
Click to expand...
It absolutely opens the election to fraud which should be a negative. It would never have been pushed by Dems if they didn't feel it would benefit their chances. It worked once and won't again. Seems like it turned out really well huh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#389
#389
utvolpj said:
Sure there is if you're honest. No one believes any nursing home actually had 100% participation.

It also allows people to vote who otherwise would have no interest and have zero knowledge of what's going on. That's not a positive to getting real leadership in place. It was done because Dems believed it would win then the election. Trump was stupid and didn't push it when it became obvious those ballots would happen
Click to expand...
Back in 2008, most everyone at my mother's assisted living facility voted. They went to the polls in vans
 
#390
#390
utvolpj said:
It absolutely opens the election to fraud which should be a negative. It would never have been pushed by Dems if they didn't feel it would benefit their chances. It worked once and won't again. Seems like it turned out really well huh?
Click to expand...
There is no proof that it leads to an increase in fraud. For the most part, maximizing voter participation will help the Democratic Party candidate, but that is nothing new.
 
#391
#391
BowlBrother85 said:
There is no proof that it leads to an increase in fraud. For the most part, maximizing voter participation will help the Democratic Party candidate, but that is nothing new.
Click to expand...
It increased the opportunity for fraud. That really can't be debated. That it was only pushed by one party is also telling. Increasing votes from the less involved and educated is not a positive step.
 
#392
#392
tnmarktx said:
Election laws were changed in swing states to create a massive number of mail in ballots, at the same time safeguards were removed that ensured these ballots were valid. Many of these changes weren't made by the state legislatures, which is illegal. As far as you calling me names, you can go f*** yourself.
Click to expand...

OK, here's the response to saying the election was stolen. It's a report published by a number of Conservative leaders including former Senator John Danforth who was Clarence Thomas's sponsor during confirmation hearings, Mitch McConnell, conservative lawyer Ben Ginsberg. I can hear you now going to the BS line that anyone who does follow Trump is a RINO. But it doesn't work guys.

Read it and weep: https://lostnotstolen.org//wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Lost-Not-Stolen-The-Conservative-Case-that-Trump-Lost-and-Biden-Won-the-2020-Presidential-Election-July-2022.pdf
 
#393
#393
WBO said:
OK, here's the response to saying the election was stolen. It's a report published by a number of Conservative leaders including former Senator John Danforth who was Clarence Thomas's sponsor during confirmation hearings, Mitch McConnell, conservative lawyer Ben Ginsberg. I can hear you now going to the BS line that anyone who does follow Trump is a RINO. But it doesn't work guys.

Read it and weep: https://lostnotstolen.org//wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Lost-Not-Stolen-The-Conservative-Case-that-Trump-Lost-and-Biden-Won-the-2020-Presidential-Election-July-2022.pdf
Click to expand...
Not even going to bother reading it. Mitch McConnell is a uniparty guy, basically anything he says or is for are nothing but lies and garbage. Besides, link is dead and won't open.
 
#395
#395
WBO said:
OK, here's the response to saying the election was stolen. It's a report published by a number of Conservative leaders including former Senator John Danforth who was Clarence Thomas's sponsor during confirmation hearings, Mitch McConnell, conservative lawyer Ben Ginsberg. I can hear you now going to the BS line that anyone who does follow Trump is a RINO. But it doesn't work guys.

Read it and weep: https://lostnotstolen.org//wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Lost-Not-Stolen-The-Conservative-Case-that-Trump-Lost-and-Biden-Won-the-2020-Presidential-Election-July-2022.pdf
Click to expand...
Whether or not someone is a RINO has nothing to do with it. Only true, fringe right Republicans know the truth?

Edit: This was meant as a response to @tnmarktx
 
Last edited:
#396
#396
tnmarktx said:
Not even going to bother reading it. Mitch McConnell is a uniparty guy, basically anything he says or is for are nothing but lies and garbage. Besides, link is dead and won't open.
Click to expand...

Sorry it took me so long to reply, went on vacation.

So you refuse to read anything except something that supports your personal viewpoint.

But let's say you're legitimate in your criticisms of your party's minority leader in the Senate, what about Danforth, Ginsberg and the other signees who have dedicated their lives to Republican politics? Are they all liars?
 
#398
#398
WBO said:
Sorry it took me so long to reply, went on vacation.

So you refuse to read anything except something that supports your personal viewpoint.

But let's say you're legitimate in your criticisms of your party's minority leader in the Senate, what about Danforth, Ginsberg and the other signees who have dedicated their lives to Republican politics? Are they all liars?
Click to expand...
Unbeknownst to most, the two parties have by in large been one and the same. Whether or not they have an R or a D beside their name they are after money and power. They hold no regard to the interest of the people in this country. They are willing to step on the necks of each and everyone of us. This is the uniparty. If you don't realize this IMO you're stupid. Of course this is just my opinion. Carry on as you see fit.
 
#400
#400
Did anyone else read the first line of his paragraph as a continuation of his title, and have to read it a second time?

There is already a thread devoted to Herschel being dumb as a box of Bama rocks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top