Herschel Walker channeling his inner Travis Henry

#326
#326
tnmarktx said:
Only state legislatures can change the laws, ONLY. That is stated in the constitution. SOS or judges cannot change the laws.
Just because someone has an R in front of their name doesn't mean they don't belong to the uniparty.
Click to expand...
That is not true.

Some election officials do have the designated power to set election laws, without having changes made by their state's legislature. This is especially true during an emergency, such as a pandemic. I have posted a link to Politifact which confirms this.
 
#327
#327
BowlBrother85 said:
That is not true.

Some election officials do have the designated power to set election laws, without having changes made by their state's legislature. This is especially true during an emergency, such as a pandemic. I have posted a link to Politifact which confirms this.
Click to expand...
Article I, Section 4, Clause 1:

The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
Click to expand...

Politifact does not have the power or authority to amend the constitution.
 
#329
#329
tnmarktx said:
Politifact does not have the power or authority to amend the constitution.
Click to expand...
I didn't say they did. LOL.

PolitiFact - Steve Scalise’s flawed argument that states didn’t follow their own election laws

It is common practice for election procedures to be changed without legislation, especially during a pandemic.

"It is often the case that there are gaps in election statutes that state officials routinely fill according to their designated authority. So to say that all decisions about how elections are run must emanate from the legislature is not consistent with explicit delegated authority to state election officials."

-- Rebecca Green, an election law professor at the College of William & Mary.
 
#330
#330
BowlBrother85 said:
I didn't say they did. LOL.

PolitiFact - Steve Scalise’s flawed argument that states didn’t follow their own election laws

It is common practice for election procedures to be changed without legislation, especially during a pandemic.

"It is often the case that there are gaps in election statutes that state officials routinely fill according to their designated authority. So to say that all decisions about how elections are run must emanate from the legislature is not consistent with explicit delegated authority to state election officials."

-- Rebecca Green, an election law professor at the College of William & Mary.
Click to expand...
She's wrong. The constitution plainly states it. Now if she's saying it's common place to break the law, I'd say she's right. Look at the 2020 election.
 
#331
#331
tnmarktx said:
She's wrong. The constitution plainly states it. Now if she's saying it's common place to break the law, I'd say she's right. Look at the 2020 election.
Click to expand...
No... the election law professor isn't wrong. You don't have a clue what you are talking about.
 
#334
#334
tnmarktx said:
So, you're saying that lawyers don't lie and what they say supersedes the constitution. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
Click to expand...
You do realize that the Trump campaign filed law suits on your "States changed laws without legislation" basis, and those suits were summarily rejected by federal courts, right?
 
#335
#335
BowlBrother85 said:
You do realize that the Trump campaign filed law suits on your "States changed laws without legislation" basis, and those suits were summarily rejected by federal courts, right?
Click to expand...
That's yet once again another false statement. Most of those cases weren't heard not on basis. Evidentiary wasn't allowed in most cases, which is a failure of the judicial system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gandalf
#337
#337
BowlBrother85 said:
That was obviously not true in every case.

In Harsh Rebuke, Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Election Challenge in Pennsylvania (Published 2020)
Click to expand...
Is this the case that the that was filed for equal protection rights and the judge grandstanded about wanting to see election fraud evidence. Basically, he wanted something that wasn't even filed for. If so, you've touted this before and it made you look foolish. Want to go there again?

Edit: I had to go to a different site to see the one you linked was pay walled. You did go there, how foolish.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Caculator
#339
#339
tnmarktx said:
Is this the case that the that was filed for equal protection rights and the judge grandstanded about wanting to see election fraud evidence. Basically, he wanted something that wasn't even filed for. If so, you've touted this before and it made you look foolish. Want to go there again?

Edit: I had to go to a different site to see the one you linked was pay walled. You did go there, how foolish.
Click to expand...
This is probably the best example of a 2020 Trump campaign lawsuit being dismissed on its merits.

Trump Wisconsin lawsuit dismissed by federal judge

U.S. District Court Judge Brett Ludwig - who is a Trump nominee - concluded that Wisconsin election officials, had followed state laws when they conducted the November 3rd election.

This relates directly to your claims that state election officials weren't following the law when they made changes to election procedures, without going through the state legislature.

In his written opinion, Judge Brett Ludwig stated that :

"A sitting president who did not prevail in his bid for reelection has asked for federal court help in setting aside the popular vote based on disputed issues of election administration, issues he plainly could have raised before the vote occurred.

This court allowed the plaintiff the chance to make his case and he lost on the merits. In his reply brief, plaintiff 'asks that the Rule of Law be followed.' It has been."

---- Judge Brett Ludwig, a Republican, who was nominated to the Eastern District of Wisconsin District Court by President Donald Trump
 
#340
#340
tnmarktx said:
Is this the case that the that was filed for equal protection rights and the judge grandstanded about wanting to see election fraud evidence. Basically, he wanted something that wasn't even filed for. If so, you've touted this before and it made you look foolish. Want to go there again?

Edit: I had to go to a different site to see the one you linked was pay walled. You did go there, how foolish.
Click to expand...
Yes, it was a Trump-nominated Judge giving attorneys for the 2020 Trump campaign an opportunity to present their proof of voter fraud in a court of law... but they didn't have anything to present. Trump's attorneys would allege fraud on cable news shows, but not in court, because they knew that their claims of voter fraud were lies.
 
#341
#341
BowlBrother85 said:
Yes, it was a Trump-nominated Judge giving attorneys for the 2020 Trump campaign an opportunity to present their proof of voter fraud in a court of law... but they didn't have anything to present. Trump's attorneys would allege fraud on cable news shows, but not in court, because they knew that their claims of voter fraud were lies.
Click to expand...
That’s not what was filed, you’re doubling down on looking foolish.
 
#342
#342
BowlBrother85 said:
This is probably the best example of a 2020 Trump campaign lawsuit being dismissed on its merits.

Trump Wisconsin lawsuit dismissed by federal judge

U.S. District Court Judge Brett Ludwig - who is a Trump nominee - concluded that Wisconsin election officials, had followed state laws when they conducted the November 3rd election.

This relates directly to your claims that state election officials weren't following the law when they made changes to election procedures, without going through the state legislature.

In his written opinion, Judge Brett Ludwig stated that :

"A sitting president who did not prevail in his bid for reelection has asked for federal court help in setting aside the popular vote based on disputed issues of election administration, issues he plainly could have raised before the vote occurred.

This court allowed the plaintiff the chance to make his case and he lost on the merits. In his reply brief, plaintiff 'asks that the Rule of Law be followed.' It has been."

---- Judge Brett Ludwig, a Republican, who was nominated to the Eastern District of Wisconsin District Court by President Donald Trump
Click to expand...
https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542617

It appears the Wisconsin 2020 election was unlawful…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gandalf
#343
#343
tnmarktx said:
That’s not what was filed, you’re doubling down on looking foolish.
Click to expand...
When given the opportunity to present proof of voter fraud, attorneys for the Trump campaign could never do it. They would make allegations of fraud on Fox News, but not in court, because they knew that they didn't have any proof. You look foolish for still trying to assert that Trump was cheated, over a damn year after he left office.
 
#346
#346
BowlBrother85 said:
When given the opportunity to present proof of voter fraud, attorneys for the Trump campaign could never do it. They would make allegations of fraud on Fox News, but not in court, because they knew that they didn't have any proof. You look foolish for still trying to assert that Trump was cheated, over a damn year after he left office.
Click to expand...
That particular case was filed on equal protection, should’ve been all that was discussed. Like you, the judge no matter who appointed him, is a partisan hack.
 
#347
#347
tnmarktx said:
Sure I do. Ballot drop boxes were ruled an unlawful way to vote in Wisconsin. Therefore, the 2020 election in Wisconsin was unlawful.
Click to expand...
LOL. That's not how it works.

A procedure ruled unlawful by a court in 2022, only becomes unlawful from that day forward. It doesn't retroactively apply to 2020. Using your logic, states which have banned abortions since Roe v Wade was overturned could start charging women who had an abortion in 2020 with a crime.
 
#348
#348
I ain't gone lie. My first thought when I saw Herschel running was, "are you kidding me? He may ruin an easy seat to pick up. This is how elections are lost."

All we can hope for is Warnock is considered so radical the Bulldog faithful turn out for Herschel in spite of....
 
#349
#349
BowlBrother85 said:
LOL. That's not how it works.

A procedure ruled unlawful by a court in 2022, only becomes unlawful from that day forward. It doesn't retroactively apply to 2020. Using your logic, states which have banned abortions since Roe v Wade was overturned could start charging women who had an abortion in 2020 with a crime.
Click to expand...
The ballot boxes were ruled unlawful like was used in the 2020 election. You realize you’re admitting you’re for fraudulent and unlawful elections. If you just come out and say so, it’d probably be the only truth you’ve ever told on here.
 
#350
#350
tnmarktx said:
The ballot boxes were ruled unlawful like was used in the 2020 election. You realize you’re admitting you’re for fraudulent and unlawful elections. If you just come out and say so, it’d probably be the only truth you’ve ever told on here.
Click to expand...
That is not true at all. The ballot drop boxes were ruled unlawful by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2022. However, they were legal to use in Wisconsin in 2020, and as far as the legitimacy of the 2020 Presidential Election is concerned, that is what matters.

All I'm saying, is that ballot drop boxes were legal to use in Wisconsin, at the time that they were used in 2020. Their usage for the 2020 election cycle was not unlawful.

I know I've already said this once, but there just isn't a better way to say it ....

A procedure ruled unlawful by a court, only becomes unlawful going forward from the day the ruling is handed down. The ruling doesn't retroactively apply to past elections. You can't say that the 2020 Wisconsin elections were unlawful due to this ruling, any more than you can say that all abortions were unlawful in Alabama in 2020.

Drop boxes were legal to use in Wisconsin in 2020. No laws were broken. You can't retroactively apply a court ruling like that.
 
Last edited:
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top