DinkinFlicka
Erect Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2009
- Messages
- 29,742
- Likes
- 24,846
Looks like an awesome hike. Definitely got that and Kilimanjaro next up on my list when I get some time. Just do plenty of research online before you go.. looks like the hike "only" goes to 13.8k feet so you should be fine with the altitude. The key is to take it slow and drink lots of water. Those are crucial to letting your body acclimatize. Oh and bring plenty of TP.Will only be my second time hiking in freezing temps. Definitely made more of a man out of me the first time around in Colorado.
Looks like an awesome hike. Definitely got that and Kilimanjaro next up on my list when I get some time. Just do plenty of research online before you go.. looks like the hike "only" goes to 13.8k feet so you should be fine with the altitude. The key is to take it slow and drink lots of water. Those are crucial to letting your body acclimatize. Oh and bring plenty of TP.
Already done it . I don't know why anyone would do it guided though. Solo is the way to go! (No guide no porter). Obligatory sun rising over Everest pic included from the hike up to Kala Pathar (18,500 ft). Spent 45 minutes alone atop the summit and it was truly humbling.Don't forget about Everest base camp, the plane ticket is more expensive than the guided hike. Some of us are talking about doing it by 2020.
Found a good company that'll do a 5 day for 600.
From all accounts it's not as physically taxing as what I did in Colombia, but only if I acclimate myself. I'm thinking about buying one of those stupid training masks.
Alright dudes... Machu Picchu.
Anyone finished it? Slated for 6/31.
Ciudad de Perdida was definitely all I could handle but I finished at the head of the pack. I understand altitude prep is a bigger factor in Peru.
Anyone have a good company through which to go?
Ulysses, have you ever invested in a good pair of trekking poles? If not, you might be interested in this study, which attempted to quantify the degree to which trekking poles improve hiking efficiency. Participants completed two hiking trials on consecutive days. Each athlete was randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group 1 acted as the control group and completed both trials without poles. Group 2 hiked the first day without poles and the second day with poles. Both trials were completed on Snow King Mountain in Jackson, WY. The hiking path was a 1000m (.62 mile) stretch of the mountains boot pack trail. The path covered approximately 3281ft of horizontal distance and 1556ft of vertical distance, giving the route an average grade of 47.4% (27.1 degrees).
Without going into details on physiological parameters that were examined or precisely how their statistical data were analyzed, the bottom-line results of their study were as follows:
To assess overall metabolic efficiency, we once again turned to the connection between HR and speed called: Heart Rate-Running Speed Index. . . . If trekking poles do improve efficiency, the effects should be seen as increases in the groups Heart Rate-Running Speed Index.
As you can see in GRAPH 2, the trekking pole group experienced a 16.0% increase in efficiency (based on their HR-Running Speed Index) while the non-pole group experienced only a 5.0% increase. This means that the trekking pole group gained about 11.0% more efficiency. Our real-world results add weight to the laboratory studies which show that trekking poles can have a positive effect on uphill movement. . . . When hiking uphill at significant grade, under significant load (approximately 47% grade and 40% bodyweight), trekking poles increase efficiency by approximately 10% and decrease perceived effort by 20%.
See At Steep Grades Using Trekking Poles is 20% Easier and 10% more Efficient - Mountain Tactical Institute.
Aleve that kneeYes..I use them. I was a flooring installer for 26 years, and on top of that I have a gentic predisposition for extreme osteoarthritis..so I am in really bad shape in my knees and back. I probably shouldn't be trying to do too much hiking at all till I can get surgery, but I just love it so much I can't help it.
This past weekend we camped at Cosby CG in GSMNP, and I meant to just sit by the fire and relax, and maybe walk the nature trail...instead I walked the mile long nature trail and ended up walking two miles up the Gabes mountain trail..now today I can barely move. I am in excruciating pain.
Ulysses, have you ever invested in a good pair of trekking poles? If not, you might be interested in this study, which attempted to quantify the degree to which trekking poles improve hiking efficiency. Participants completed two hiking trials on consecutive days. Each athlete was randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group 1 acted as the control group and completed both trials without poles. Group 2 hiked the first day without poles and the second day with poles. Both trials were completed on Snow King Mountain in Jackson, WY. The hiking path was a 1000m (.62 mile) stretch of the mountains boot pack trail. The path covered approximately 3281ft of horizontal distance and 1556ft of vertical distance, giving the route an average grade of 47.4% (27.1 degrees).
Without going into details on physiological parameters that were examined or precisely how their statistical data were analyzed, the bottom-line results of their study were as follows:
To assess overall metabolic efficiency, we once again turned to the connection between HR and speed called: Heart Rate-Running Speed Index. . . . If trekking poles do improve efficiency, the effects should be seen as increases in the groups Heart Rate-Running Speed Index.
As you can see in GRAPH 2, the trekking pole group experienced a 16.0% increase in efficiency (based on their HR-Running Speed Index) while the non-pole group experienced only a 5.0% increase. This means that the trekking pole group gained about 11.0% more efficiency. Our real-world results add weight to the laboratory studies which show that trekking poles can have a positive effect on uphill movement. . . . When hiking uphill at significant grade, under significant load (approximately 47% grade and 40% bodyweight), trekking poles increase efficiency by approximately 10% and decrease perceived effort by 20%.
See At Steep Grades Using Trekking Poles is 20% Easier and 10% more Efficient - Mountain Tactical Institute.
Ulysses, have you ever invested in a good pair of trekking poles? If not, you might be interested in this study, which attempted to quantify the degree to which trekking poles improve hiking efficiency. Participants completed two hiking trials on consecutive days. Each athlete was randomly assigned to one of two groups. Group 1 acted as the control group and completed both trials without poles. Group 2 hiked the first day without poles and the second day with poles. Both trials were completed on Snow King Mountain in Jackson, WY. The hiking path was a 1000m (.62 mile) stretch of the mountains boot pack trail. The path covered approximately 3281ft of horizontal distance and 1556ft of vertical distance, giving the route an average grade of 47.4% (27.1 degrees).
Without going into details on physiological parameters that were examined or precisely how their statistical data were analyzed, the bottom-line results of their study were as follows:
To assess overall metabolic efficiency, we once again turned to the connection between HR and speed called: Heart Rate-Running Speed Index. . . . If trekking poles do improve efficiency, the effects should be seen as increases in the groups Heart Rate-Running Speed Index.
As you can see in GRAPH 2, the trekking pole group experienced a 16.0% increase in efficiency (based on their HR-Running Speed Index) while the non-pole group experienced only a 5.0% increase. This means that the trekking pole group gained about 11.0% more efficiency. Our real-world results add weight to the laboratory studies which show that trekking poles can have a positive effect on uphill movement. . . . When hiking uphill at significant grade, under significant load (approximately 47% grade and 40% bodyweight), trekking poles increase efficiency by approximately 10% and decrease perceived effort by 20%.
See At Steep Grades Using Trekking Poles is 20% Easier and 10% more Efficient - Mountain Tactical Institute.
That path is steep. I have hiked up to ski after the lifts are closed for the season. I would also run and bike up Snow King after the snow melt. While it was on the cat tracks it was still pretty steep, that hill has a pretty impressive vertical.
Yep, 1556ft of vertical distance in 3281ft of horizontal distance definitely qualifies as steep.
By the way, do you have any thoughts on fall foliage hotspots in the Eastern Sierra and White Mountains, all the way from Lone Pine to Bishop, Mammoth Lakes and points in between? Furthermore, when do the aspen in that area tend to peak?