hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 114,574
- Likes
- 162,781
This is not that complicated. Either you believe the work emails were saved, you think they weren't, or you're not sure.
People in the second were not voting for her anyway. The third group, 18 months from now, won't likely vote based on what will at that point be a stale controversy. Politically she should just less this fade.
This is not that complicated. Either you believe the work emails were saved, you think they weren't, or you're not sure.
People in the second were not voting for her anyway. The third group, 18 months from now, won't likely vote based on what will at that point be a stale controversy. Politically she should just let this fade.
I think the one device thing might have some merit to it from the beginning of her tenure, especially going back to Senate days. Back then, having a device devoted to emails or calls or other production of documents or links, was the norm back then. And likely it did not occur to her or anyone to make a switch somewhere along the way. It just would not have seemed necessary.
There is a reasonable explanation, but the GOP does not want to hear that because, frankly, it makes perfect sense and its boring. That's why I say let some third party examine the server work work-related emails. And prior to that, I would require a showing that there was substantial reason to do that, as opposed to just hoping there's some random thing on there you can use in the campiagn.
Muddied waters comment from earlier...more and more stories of people using one or more additional email addresses and devices will begin coming forth...
Reports: Eric Holder, Chuck Hagel used alternate emails - Adam B. Lerner - POLITICO
I have 3 emails set up on this iphone6. Not complicated at all. So Hillarys excuse is lame, she's hiding something. Probably money trails from foreign donations she doesn't want to reveal. Possibly, incriminating emails too. But she's definitly hiding something.
Do you believe her story as she told it today? Simple question.
I think she should have elaborated on how it started, and then said she'd be happy to search any emails on the server for work related terms of any concern or interest and separately produce those, even if they are already in the prior release, I.e. search for any email with the word Benghazi in it and give it to State Department to make sure it's clear for release. Offer to let independent person do it.
That to me would have been best.
Such BS. Even if technological limitations in the dark days of 2009 were an issue, the only appropriate course would have been to carry a device for State business and check her personal account on own time. Security cannot be trumped by convenience.
Mark Levin, a talk radio host, played audio of her from 3 weeks ago. It was in front of a crowd of people. From the sounds of it, one of those let your hair down types of things. HC said she had an IPhone. Apple fans in audience cheered. Then she said, "in full disclosure...iPhone and BlackBerry".
Interesting.
Mark Levin, a talk radio host, played audio of her from 3 weeks ago. It was in front of a crowd of people. From the sounds of it, one of those let your hair down types of things. HC said she had an IPhone. Apple fans in audience cheered. Then she said, "in full disclosure...iPhone and BlackBerry".
Interesting.