Hillary Clinton Uses Personal Email for State Business

#580
#580
She actually thinks people will believe this?.....

“I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two,” she explained. She asked, in effect, that voters trust that she was disclosing more of them than she needed to — and even to credit her with an unusual degree of transparency.

Of course the LGs of the world will but ......
 
#581
#581
Velo Vol said:
Not especially. Particularly its security safeguards.
Click to expand...

It's not really about security.

It's about privacy - Google/Gmail stores everything forever. Nothing ever gets deleted.

Why Gmail and other e-mail services aren't really free - CNN.com

Google's changes to Gmail provoke more privacy fears

https://epic.org/privacy/gmail/faq.html

Google: Email Users Can't Legitimately Expect Privacy When Emailing Someone On Gmail (UPDATED)

Google asserts that, in principle, if you entrust your personal messages to a third party, you can't expect that the third party won't touch any of that information:

Just as a sender of a letter to a business colleague cannot be surprised that the recipient’s assistant opens the letter, people who use web-based email today cannot be surprised if their communications are processed by the recipient’s ECS provider in the course of delivery. Indeed, “a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turns over to third parties.” Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735, 743-44 (1979). In particular, the Court noted
that persons communicating through a service provided by an intermediary (in the Smith case, a telephone call routed through a telephone company) must necessarily expect that the communication will be subject to the intermediary’s systems. For example, the Court explained that in using the telephone, a person “voluntarily convey numerical information to the telephone company and ‘expose’ that information to its equipment in the ordinary course of business.”

Google also argued that restricting how email providers are permitted to process the data they receive could "criminalize" features like spam filtering and inbox searches:

Last, Plaintiffs’ claims should be rejected because they would lead to anomalous results with far-ranging consequences beyond the allegations in the Complaint. Plaintiffs’ theory–that any scanning of email content by ECS providers is illegal–would effectively criminalize routine practices that are an everyday aspect of using email. Indeed, Plaintiffs’ effort to carve out spam filtering and virus detection from their claims underscores the fact that their theory of liability would otherwise encompass these common services that email users depend on.
Click to expand...
 
#582
#582
"See? This is why I don't use e-mail."

- Lindsey Graham, member of the United States Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law
 
#584
#584
The fact that Lindsey graham ..,., that creepy lookin' sob ...... Has never used email should tell us all something about the type of people holding office in Washington.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#585
#585
lawgator1 said:
^
Does not comprehend distinction between has and had.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't that be, comprehend the distinction between "is" and "is"?


Bill-Clinton.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#587
#587
hog88 said:
Pretty desperate when you have to throw out Lindsey Graham as a defense.
Click to expand...

I see you went ahead and assumed that I'm defending Hillary here?

I'm not, but nonetheless amusing to see you completely jump the fence and make brash and unfounded assumptions based on little information.
 
#588
#588
Carl Pickens said:
The fact that Lindsey graham ..,., that creepy lookin' sob ...... Has never used email should tell us all something about the type of people holding office in Washington.
Click to expand...

It makes sense, if you look at his quotes regarding NSA surveillance.

He knows Big Brother is watching your, mine and his every move. He's not a luddite. He just doesn't want the NSA watching him so that's why he doesn't use e-mail. Handwritten notes from a guy that supports the mass surveillance of the US.

That tells me all I need to know about him and his policies. It's like a rich guy saying:

"I don't like paying taxes. That's why I bank overseas. But I fully support raising taxes on the Middle Class because we have to fund these programs somehow."

And, no, I'm not a raving lunatic that has it out for wealthy people, hog.
 
#590
#590
volinbham said:
Do you believe her story as she told it today? Simple question.
Click to expand...

Like all liberals, he doesn't believe it matters. No matter how corrupt she is, she will be better than anything the competition has to offer.

Liberals see what they believe.
 
#598
#598
lawgator1 said:
I think she should have elaborated on how it started, and then said she'd be happy to search any emails on the server for work related terms of any concern or interest and separately produce those, even if they are already in the prior release, I.e. search for any email with the word Benghazi in it and give it to State Department to make sure it's clear for release. Offer to let independent person do it.

That to me would have been best.
Click to expand...

You didn't answer the question - do you believe her story; even just the "I used a private server owned by my husband because I didn't want to carry two devices" part.

Do you believe she did this for convenience (one device vs two).
 
#599
#599
Interesting:

Jen Psaki (State Spokesperson) was asked if Hillary signed her OF-109 when she left the Department, which all exiting State employees are required to do:

Video

The form declares that she had turned over all relevant records prior to her departure. We know she didn't do that. She turned them in near the end of 2014.

The form states that failing to turn over all records is a felony.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top