McDad
I can't brain today; I has the dumb.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2011
- Messages
- 56,717
- Likes
- 119,022
Also LG, it didn't look good for her that when the questioning became aggressive her assistant rushed in and pulled her out. Look at the tape, Hillary didn't end the PC her handler did. Also, why was someone off camera selecting the reporters who got to ask questions?
Also LG, it didn't look good for her that when the questioning became aggressive her assistant rushed in and pulled her out. Look at the tape, Hillary didn't end the PC her handler did. Also, why was someone off camera selecting the reporters who got to ask questions?
Also LG, it didn't look good for her that when the questioning became aggressive her assistant rushed in and pulled her out. Look at the tape, Hillary didn't end the PC her handler did. Also, why was someone off camera selecting the reporters who got to ask questions?
Also LG, it didn't look good for her that when the questioning became aggressive her assistant rushed in and pulled her out. Look at the tape, Hillary didn't end the PC her handler did. Also, why was someone off camera selecting the reporters who got to ask questions?
This is nothing. In any press conferences like this they have handlers that cut off questions at a certain point. Of all that anyone could run with on this, this item is at the bottom of the list.
Servergate isn't going away. It will ruin her chances and the Dems will have Biden and Pocahontas left.
Body language. She was not in control of the room and whether or not so, it appeared as if she was rescued.
Most Americans will never see this presser. Of those who do watch it, they will only see a few clips of answering some questions. While I think this was a negative event for her when it could have been a positive one, I still am not sure it does much damage. Like I said, if no evidence of illegal action or covert info going out an unauthorized door, I think this gets chalked up to typical Clinton shadiness - which America is used to.
Did not come across well at all.
The whole idea that you need to carry two devices to have two email addresses is ludicrous.
The other inadvertent mistake she made was telling us she deleted (got rid of in her words) the emails that she deemed "not work related".
Why worry about deleting emails? Storage is cheap and she's rich. Just let them archive
It's not her job to categorize the emails
I think the one device thing might have some merit to it from the beginning of her tenure, especially going back to Senate days. Back then, having a device devoted to emails or calls or other production of documents or links, was the norm back then. And likely it did not occur to her or anyone to make a switch somewhere along the way. It just would not have seemed necessary.
There is a reasonable explanation, but the GOP does not want to hear that because, frankly, it makes perfect sense and its boring. That's why I say let some third party examine the server work work-related emails. And prior to that, I would require a showing that there was substantial reason to do that, as opposed to just hoping there's some random thing on there you can use in the campiagn.