Hillary Clinton Uses Personal Email for State Business

[VolsNSkinsFan]

It's also being reported that the servers were set up under a fake name. Lol

 

[bamawriter]

It's also being reported that the servers were set up under a fake name. Lol

There are three different domains, and they were all set up under a pseudonym.

 

[AirVol]

There are three different domains, and they were all set up under a pseudonym.

Shhhh......don't state facts. You'll be labeled a right wing extremist or racist. (or worse)

LG will never believe it anyway, it's all made up by the GOP.

 

[lawgator1]

The list of HRC's fake scandals is pretty long.

A testament to how much the far right hates her, and how desperate they are to try to defeat her.

 

[davethevol]

A testament to how much the far right hates her, and how desperate they are to try to defeat her.

I think they dislike her because she's a piece of monkey poo, as clearly evidenced by what has been exposed.

 

[hog88]

A testament to how much the far right hates her, and how desperate they are to try to defeat her.

Yep that's it.

 

[lawgator1]

You honestly think she set up the servers? She never used her .gov email address. You can't "play dumb" and want to be Potus. There are reports she was warned not to use it. My whole issue is security

Am I watching Fox News?

"There are reports ...."

"Some say ..."

"Others question ...."

No context, no facts, no attribution. Just thrown out there to rattle around in the far right echo chamber, with the eventual hope that it will be adopted as fact, merely by repetition.

 

[bamawriter]

A testament to how much the far right hates her, and how desperate they are to try to defeat her.

It's too bad that kind, gullible ol' granny Clinton has kept wandering headlong into all of these fake scandals for the better part of three decades. That darn GOP!

 

[FLVOL_79]

The list of HRC's fake scandals is pretty long.

Do they include all those fake murders as well?

 

[hog88]

LG you appear to be way more concerned about what Fox news reports than the actual actions/decisions of your politician of choice.

Am I watching Fox News?

"There are reports ...."

"Some say ..."

"Others question ...."

No context, no facts, no attribution. Just thrown out there to rattle around in the far right echo chamber, with the eventual hope that it will be adopted as fact, merely by repetition.

Nailed it.

 

[BeecherVol]

A testament to how much of a mess she has made in a leadership role and how desperate they are to prevent that going forward.

.

 

[lawgator1]

I think they dislike her because she's a piece of monkey poo, as clearly evidenced by what has been exposed.

You weren't going to vote for her, anyway. I seriously doubt that there will be more than a few swing voters in November 2016 who decide not to vote for her because she used gmail.

If this is the kind of attack we can look forward to, if this is the best you can do, she might as well pick out a new china pattern.

 

[VolsNSkinsFan]

Am I watching Fox News?

"There are reports ...."

"Some say ..."

"Others question ...."

No context, no facts, no attribution. Just thrown out there to rattle around in the far right echo chamber, with the eventual hope that it will be adopted as fact, merely by repetition.

Clinton's Office Warned Over Private Email Use | Al Jazeera America

 

[YorkVol]

A testament to how much the far right hates her, and how desperate they are to try to defeat her.

Yeah, that's it.

 

[lawgator1]

Do they include all those fake murders as well?

Those are my favorite. These three people agree.

 

[utvolpj]

You honestly think she set up the servers? She never used her .gov email address. You can't "play dumb" and want to be Potus. There are reports she was warned not to use it. My whole issue is security

Of course not but she hired someone who can't be traced to do it. Definitely sounds innocent enough

 

[hog88]

You weren't going to vote for her, anyway. I seriously doubt that there will be more than a few swing voters in November 2016 who decide not to vote for her because she used gmail.

If this is the kind of attack we can look forward to, if this is the best you can do, she might as well pick out a new china pattern.

I agree with the bolded.

It would bet it will be the screeching, snarky, you're beneath me answers she gives during the debates not to mention her age and mental capacity that turns off most of the swing voters.

 

[utvolpj]

If this is the kind of attack we can look forward to, if this is the best you can do, she might as well pick out a new china pattern.

Maybe she can just return the ones she stole when she moved out last time

 

[bamawriter]

Am I watching Fox News?

"There are reports ...."

"Some say ..."

"Others question ...."

No context, no facts, no attribution. Just thrown out there to rattle around in the far right echo chamber, with the eventual hope that it will be adopted as fact, merely by repetition.

Ask, and ye shall receive:

From the Washington Post

The White House on Tuesday said Clinton appeared to have operated in violation of “very specific guidance” from the West Wing that members of the Obama administration use government e-mail accounts to carry out official business.

 

[YorkVol]

You weren't going to vote for her, anyway. I seriously doubt that there will be more than a few swing voters in November 2016 who decide not to vote for her because she used gmail.

If this is the kind of attack we can look forward to, if this is the best you can do, she might as well pick out a new china pattern.

Can't she use the ones she took the last time she moved out of the White House?

 

[davethevol]

You weren't going to vote for her, anyway. I seriously doubt that there will be more than a few swing voters in November 2016 who decide not to vote for her because she used gmail.

If this is the kind of attack we can look forward to, if this is the best you can do, she might as well pick out a new china pattern.

I will never again vote democrat at the federal level, and there's a good chance I won't vote republican either. That being said, it sounds like she needs to spend some time in jail. I'm tired of these politicians getting away with everything.

 

[BeecherVol]

Maybe she can just return the ones she stole when she moved out last time

 

[lawgator1]

Ask, and ye shall receive:

From the Washington Post

Did you happen to read the link within the story? Kind of important.

 

[hog88]

Did you happen to read the link within the story? Kind of important.

So do think she will comply with the congressional subpoena without a fight and turn over ALL of her emails without redaction?

 

[bamawriter]

Did you happen to read the link within the story? Kind of important.

I'm assuming you mean this one:

White House says Clinton did not heed e-mail policy - The Washington Post

Earnest clearly says she didn't comply with "very specific guidance" to use a .gov account. Absent that, the administration would have to "rely on Clinton’s assurances that she met the fallback requirement of sending along the pertinent e-mails to be archived."

He makes absolutely no statement indicating that she had done so. He doesn't even suggest that he assumed or hoped she had done so.

So, exactly what is it about that story that makes you feel better about this issue?