Jaytrain5
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2006
- Messages
- 11,285
- Likes
- 491
With 17 seconds, you should be able to come up with a higher percentage shot than Chism for three. Especially down 1.
He was wide open, he can hit that shot, why wouldn't he take it?
Blame that on Maze. Chism did the right thing. It was still a better look than 80% of other possibilities. And it was a lot better than what we get at crunch time last year where we're throwing up a 1-handed three from 30-feet out with a hand in our face.
Agreed . . . We should have gotten a much better look, but after Maze dribbled around for 10 seconds, Chism shooting a wide open 2 wasn't a half bad result.Blame that on Maze. Chism did the right thing. It was still a better look than 80% of other possibilities. And it was a lot better than what we get at crunch time last year where we're throwing up a 1-handed three from 30-feet out with a hand in our face.
Really? Having used up all your timeouts and having no better play called than to have your center heave up a three when you only need two to win is putting the team in "PERFECT position to win"?