How Stupid Does Glen Stanley Look Now?

#1
billc

billc

#1 VOL FAN
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
254
Likes
0
#1
I bet he wishes he had stuck with the Vols now.He will not have a chance to play for a national championship in his college career now if he stays at USC.I wonder if he is bound to USC or not.I seen something to the effect if the incoming freshmen hadn't enrolled by now they could possibly transfer without penalty.Not that I would want him after he turned his back on us at the last minute.
 
#2
#2
billc said:
I bet he wishes he had stuck with the Vols now.He will not have a chance to play for a national championship in his college career now if he stays at USC.I wonder if he is bound to USC or not.I seen something to the effect if the incoming freshmen hadn't enrolled by now they could possibly transfer without penalty.Not that I would want him after he turned his back on us at the last minute.
Click to expand...

I read earlier that anybody that would graduate before they were bowl eligible again could transfer without penalty. I don't remember how many years of eligibility he has left though. I doubt he ever plays for SC
 
#3
#3
One would argue that he has just a good of a chance to compete for a national title at USC now that he would at Tennessee... Just saying...
 
#4
#4
He wouldn't have been eligible to play at UT. Didn't meet all the SEC course requirements for JUCO transfers.
 
#5
#5
I read an article on Yahoo sports that said they were penalized 30 scholarships in a 3 year period. Does anybody know if that is right? Everywhere else, I saw 20.
 
#6
#6
ddean1357 said:
I read an article on Yahoo sports that said they were penalized 30 scholarships in a 3 year period. Does anybody know if that is right? Everywhere else, I saw 20.
Click to expand...

Its 10 scholarships per year for three years.
 
#8
#8
Reverend Rocky To said:
One would argue that he has just a good of a chance to compete for a national title at USC now that he would at Tennessee... Just saying...
Click to expand...

No I would have to say ever how minute Tennessee's chances they have to better than the Trojans.Any percentage chance is better than a 0% chance last time I looked.At least at Tennessee he had at least a chance to go to a bowl.
 
#10
#10
SGMVols said:
He wouldn't have been eligible to play at UT. Didn't meet all the SEC course requirements for JUCO transfers.
Click to expand...

I think it was just a math class wasn't it.Couldn't he have took it this summer and been eligible this fall.
 
#12
#12
billc said:
I think it was just a math class wasn't it.Couldn't he have took it this summer and been eligible this fall.
Click to expand...

Maybe he didn't know at the time he needed it and later decided it wasn't worth it. Doesn't mean he stabbed us in the back. And I absolutely would welcome him to UT if he wanted to transfer, but I doubt he leaves.
 
#13
#13
I read somewhere that if the incoming freshmen hadn't enrolled yet they wasn't bound by their letter of intent.Kinda of what happened with our mid term enrollees.
 
#14
#14
billc said:
I read somewhere that if the incoming freshmen hadn't enrolled yet they wasn't bound by their letter of intent.Kinda of what happened with our mid term enrollees.
Click to expand...

That's not true unless they fail to qualify or are granted a release by the school, and EEs don't sign LOI; they just enroll.
 
#16
#16
SGMVols said:
That's not true unless they fail to qualify or are granted a release by the school, and EEs don't sign LOI; they just enroll.
Click to expand...

I meant only in USC's case not every case.I meant since they got the post season ban that if the kids hadn't enrolled they wasn't bound by their letter of intent.
 
#17
#17
SGMVols said:
That's not true unless they fail to qualify or are granted a release by the school, and EEs don't sign LOI; they just enroll.
Click to expand...

I believe they can petition the NCAA for a release. That was on another thread earlier today. The guy quoted the NCAA rule book.
 
#18
#18
billc said:
I meant only in USC's case not every case.I meant since they got the post season ban that if the kids hadn't enrolled they wasn't bound by their letter of intent.
Click to expand...

That would be between the player and the 'AA. Without either a release from USC or a waiver from the 'AA, I'm pretty sure LOIs are still binding even in this case.
 
#20
#20
SGMVols said:
That would be between the player and the 'AA. Without either a release from USC or a waiver from the 'AA, I'm pretty sure LOIs are still binding even in this case.
Click to expand...

I meant if USC gave them a release and they wasn't enrolled.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top